Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026
Application No. 17/812,160

CONJUGATES OF ANTIBODIES AND IMMUNE CELL ENGAGERS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 12, 2022
Priority
Jan 13, 2020 — EU 20151544.2 +1 more
Examiner
PUTTLITZ, KARL J
Art Unit
1646
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Synaffix B.V.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
983 granted / 1423 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1480
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1423 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/13/2026 has been entered. The rejection under section 112(b) is withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendments in connection with this ground of rejection. The rejection under section 103 is withdrawn in favor of the following new ground of rejection under this section, which was necessitated by Applicant’s amendments: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 18, 20, 21, 23, 27-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2014065661, previously cited (WO 661), in view of: Steel et al., Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Oct 25;33(1):35–41 (Steel); and U.S. Publication No. 20210107961 based on an application by Gellert et al. (Gellert). The recited conjugates were known. For example, WO 661 teaches conjugates of antibodies and a molecule of interest (defined as “D”): PNG media_image1.png 228 798 media_image1.png Greyscale The molecule of interest is protein, peptide or amino acid (i.e., antibody fragment). The molecule of interest can include biological molecules (page 36), which include the recited cytokines. See page 35. WO 661 teaches the structure of the instant conjugates: PNG media_image2.png 368 586 media_image2.png Greyscale Antibodies with the required specificities are taught, see page 17. The molecule of interest can include biological molecules and peptides (page 36), which include the recited cytokines. WO may not explicitly teach IL-15 payload-conjugates. However, Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a powerful immunostimulatory cytokine that drives the proliferation and cytotoxic activity of Natural Killer (NK) cells and memory CD8+ T cells. It acts as a next-generation alternative to IL-2, attacking cancer without expanding immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). For example, Steel teaches that the broad immunological activity coupled with an apparent lack of toxicity seen in preclinical studies makes IL-15 an exciting candidate for cancer therapy. The similarity it shares with IL-2 has lead to the speculation that it might be effective in cancers in which IL-2 has been effective, i.e. renal cancer and melanoma, and to date these are the cancers being examined in the first clinical trials of IL-15. Improved safety while retaining or improving efficacy, when compared to IL-2, would make IL-15 attractive for treating these cancers, see conclusion. Moreover, Gellert teaches constructs comprising an antibody against the cancer antigen MUC1 and IL-15. In particular, the fusion protein constructs activate NK cells and T cells at the cancer site: PNG media_image3.png 488 338 media_image3.png Greyscale In this way, those of ordinary skill could have applied IL-15 payloads in the manner required and in a predictable fashion for the purposes of obtaining the recited conjugates. As outlined above, WO 661 teaches the structure of the instant conjugates. The secondary references are added for the proposition that IL-15 payloads are to these conjugates. Specifically, the secondary references teach that the particular known technique of using IL-15 as an anti-cancer agent in antibody conjugates was recognized as part of the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art. In this manner, those of ordinary skill would have recognized that applying the known technique to the conjugates described by WO 661 would have yielded predictable results. Accordingly, using IL-15 as a payload for the purposes of providing an antibody conjugate for cancer therapy would have been prima facie obvious. Therefore, based on the above, the references teach the structural elements of the claimed constructs with sufficient guidance, particularity, and with a reasonable expectation of success, that the invention would be prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill (the prior art reference teaches or suggests all the claim limitations with a reasonable expectation of success. See M.P.E.P. § 2143). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KARL J PUTTLITZ whose telephone number is (571)272-0645. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Gregory Emch, can be reached at telephone number 571-272-8149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /KARL J PUTTLITZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 09, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697346
THIARABINE- AND THIARABINE PRODRUG-BASED TREATMENTS
4y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12679822
ALKENYL PYRIMIDINE COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678513
ANTI-HER2 IMMUNOCONJUGATES, AND USES THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673113
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING CANCER WITH CANCER-TARGETED ADJUVANTS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674003
SITE-SPECIFIC GLYCOENGINEERING OF TARGETING MOIETIES
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1423 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month