Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/816,592

GLASSY SOLID-STATE ELECTRODES AND METHODS OF MAKING GLASSY SOLID-STATE ELECTRODES AND BATTERY CELLS THEREOF

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Aug 01, 2022
Priority
Sep 10, 2021 — provisional 63/261,091
Examiner
WEINER, LAURA S
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Polyplus Battery Company
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
976 granted / 1144 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1188
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1144 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2-6-2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The rejection of claims 13-14 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1 and 6 of prior U.S. Patent No. US 12,237,511. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 2-6-2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 12,237,511 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Therefore, the rejection of claims 13-14 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 12,237,511 has been withdrawn. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1 and 6 of prior U.S. Patent No. US 12,237,511. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. U.S. Patent No. US 12,237,511 claims in claim 1, a method of making a glassy embedded electrode (cathode) because the claim comprises a cathode active material assembly, the method comprising:i) providing a porous electroactive network comprising a cathode active material pore;ii) coating the electroactive network surfaces with a protective nanofilm that covers the cathode active material pore surfaces; ANDiii) impregnating the pores of the electroactive network with a prepreg [impregnating a liquid phase dispersion of lithium-sulfide glass particles in a solvent and evaporating the solvent, from claim 6]. Thus, claiming the same as instant claim 13. U.S. Patent No. US 12,237,511 claims in claim 1, iii) impregnating the pores of the electroactive network with a prepreg and heating the prepreg to cause the glass particles to viscously sinter to each other forming a continuous glassy medium into penetrating with the electroactive network. Thus, claiming the same as instant claim 14. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 15 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Uchida (JP2010123463) teaches in Figure 1, an all-solid-state lithium ion battery (100) comprising a positive electrode (10) comprising a current collector (14) and a porous positive electrode active material layer (16) [thereby satisfying providing a porous electroactive network comprising an active material]; and a solid electrolyte layer (30) comprising LiPON (lithium phosphate oxynitride glass) [thereby the method of coating with a protective nanofilm with lithium phosphorous sulfide glass, claim 15]. Uchida teaches wherein the solid electrolyte is deposited [fig.1-electrolyte 30, positive electrode active material layer 16] on a porous cathode active material layer and is embedded into the pores of the electrode active material layer. The solid electrolyte thereby encapsulates and extends into the depth of the electroactive network as claimed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Laura Weiner whose telephone number is (571)272-1294. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am-5 pm EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tong Guo can be reached at 571-272-3066. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA S. WEINER/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1723 /Laura Weiner/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Feb 06, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640396
ORGANIC ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION AND LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640370
POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND BATTERY
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633539
POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET, SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND ELECTRICAL APPARATUS
1y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626927
POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL AND BATTERY
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620581
ELECTRODE PIECE AND BATTERY
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1144 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month