Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/821,888

AGRICULTURAL SAMPLING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 24, 2022
Examiner
GONZALEZ, MADELINE
Art Unit
1773
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Precision Planting, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
583 granted / 805 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
834
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 805 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-15 are rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 9-10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation “an annular seal which seals the filter unit to the main body of the filter unit” in lines 2-3. This limitation is confusing because it is not clear what applicant intends to claim. The Examiner suggests that the limitation may be replaced with -- an annular seal which seals the screen to the main body of the filter unit--. Claim 9 recites the limitation “wherein is convexly curved and dome shaped” in line 1. The claim appears to be incomplete and therefore is not clear what applicant intends to claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the end fluid connections" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the system tubing or piping" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the main slurry chamber" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kawaguchi et al. (WO 2019/058865) [hereinafter Kawaguchi] [citations are based on English Machine Translation]. With respect to claim 1, Kawaguchi discloses a filtration device 1A (filter unit), as shown in Fig. 3, having: a first flow passage member 10 (elongated main body) defining a longitudinal axis, as shown in Fig. 3; a first flow passage 11 (slurry inlet) and a second flow passage 12 (slurry outlet) in fluid communication with a third flow path 13 (slurry chamber) extending between opposing ends of the body 10, as shown in Fig. 3; a plurality of second flow path members 20 (plurality of filtrate outlets) in fluid communication with the slurry chamber 13, as shown in Fig. 12; a plurality of filtration filters 30 (plurality of individual filter screen units) fluidly interposed between the slurry chamber 13 and each of the filtrate outlets 20, as shown in Fig. 12; the screen units 30 each comprising a screen 30 removably received in a corresponding portion 15a (receptacle) in the body 10, as shown in Fig. 12, the screen units 30 configured to remove particles greater than a predetermined size from the slurry to produce a filtrate (see page 4, lines 3-28). With respect to claim 2, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the screen units 30 are assemblies each comprising a screen 30 having predetermined mesh size openings, as shown in Fig. 12, and a holding portion 32 (annular seal) which seals the filter unit to the main body of the filter unit, as shown in Figs.6-7. With respect to claim 3, Kawaguchi discloses wherein each screen unit 30 is removably retained in the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A by a corresponding holder 40 (retainer) detachably coupled to the main body 10 and received at least partially in each receptacle 15a, as shown in Figs. 3 and 12. With respect to claim 4, Kawaguchi discloses wherein each of the retainers 40 defines one of the filtrate outlets 20, as shown in Figs. 3 and 12. With respect to claim 5, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the screen units 30 and filtrate outlets 20 are arranged to extract a portion of the slurry when flowing through the slurry chamber 13 in a direction transverse to the longitudinal axis, as shown in Fig.12. With respect to claim 6, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the filler unit 1A is oriented horizontally when in use such that the slurry flows through the slurry chamber 13 in a horizontal direction and the filtrate is extracted from the slurry chamber 13 in a vertical direction, as shown in Fig. 12. With respect to claim 7, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the slurry inlet 11 and slurry outlet 12 are arranged at the opposing ends of the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A, as shown in Figs. 3 and 12. With respect to claim 8, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the retainers 40 are each coupled to the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A by threaded fasteners, as shown in Fig. 2A (see page 4, lines 36-38). With respect to claim 9, Kawaguchi discloses wherein element 40 is convexly curved and dome shaped, as shown in Fig. 3. With respect to claim 10, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the filter screen units 30 are configured to be removed and replaced without breaking the end fluid connections of the slurry inlet 11 and slurry outlet 12 to the system tubing or piping, as shown in Fig. 2B. With respect to claim 11, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the screen units 30 are arranged in a single linear row in the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A and spaced axially apart from each other along the longitudinal axis, as shown in Fig. 12. With respect to claim 12, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the receptacles 15a in the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A are complementary configured to the screen units 30 and upwardly open, as shown in Fig. 12, each receptacle 15a fluidly communicating with the main slurry chamber 13 of the filter unit 1A, as shown in Fig. 12. With respect to claim 13, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the retainers 40 are configured to trap the screen units 30 in the receptacles 15a of the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A, as shown in Fig. 12. With respect to claim 14, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the main body 10 of the filter unit 1A is block-shaped, as shown in Figs. 2A and 12. With respect to claim 15, Kawaguchi discloses wherein the retainers 40 have a stepped-shape cylindrical configuration, as shown in Figs. 3 and 12. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MADELINE GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-5502. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lebron can be reached at 571-272-0475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MADELINE GONZALEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594513
ROTATABLE FILTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594527
METHOD OF MAKING A CARTRIDGE FILTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589329
FLUID SEPARATION WITH SAMPLING UNIT SELECTIVELY COUPLING UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF SEPARATION UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582928
FILTER CARTRIDGE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576348
Advanced Fuel Filtration System with Interlocking Cartridge Seal Design
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.6%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 805 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month