Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/823,645

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TIME-OF-FLIGHT SENSING OF A SCENE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 31, 2022
Priority
Sep 14, 2021 — DE 102021123666.5
Examiner
RATCLIFFE, LUKE D
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1488 granted / 1704 resolved
+35.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
79.3%
+39.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1704 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) below is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schönlieb, Armin, et al. "Stray-light mitigation for under-display time-of-flight imagers." IEEE Sensors Journal 22.1 (2021): 264-278 (herein after Schönlieb) in view of Tadano (20180149752). Referring to claims 1 and 28, Schönlieb shows a method for TOF sensing of a scene, the method comprising: performing by a ToF sensor (see the TOF sensor in figure 1) comprising at least one a photo-sensitive sensor pixel (see figure 1 note the imager also see figure 2 ntoe the PMD pixel), a plurality of first ToF measurements using a first modulation frequency in order to obtain first measurement values (see the CM and CW measurements shown in page 266 between equation 5 and 6), wherein a respective correlation function of each of the plurality of first ToF measurements is periodic and exhibits (see the correlation function as shown in figure 6 note the two correlation functions for both the CM and CW measurements where zero correlation is calibrated to be at the display surface) a distance to an object located in the scene based on the first measurement values, wherein performing the plurality of first ToF measurements comprises, for at least one of the plurality of first ToF measurements (see the abstract for TOF sensing of the distance of an object), controlling the photo- sensitive sensor pixel to: selectively store, in at least two charge storages of the photo-sensitive sensor pixel, a first part of charge carriers generated in the photo-sensitive sensor pixel by incident light during the at least one of the plurality of first ToF measurements (see the storage of the of the charges shown in page 265 second column paragraph 1 to equation 3), and selectively prevent a second part of the charge carriers generated during the at least one of the plurality of first ToF measurements from reaching the at least two charge storages (see the storage of the charges as shown in page 265 second column paragraph 1 to equation 3, note the storage of charges are specific to either capacitor A or capacitor B and when the charges are equally distributed the correlation function is zero). However Schönlieb fails to show an increasing amplitude over distance within a measurement range of the ToF sensor. Tadano shows a similar device that includes a respective correlation function of each of the plurality of first ToF measurements is periodic and exhibits an increasing amplitude over distance within a measurement range of the ToF sensor (see figure 11B also see paragraph 110). It would have been obvious to include the increasing amplitude of the correlation function as shown by Tadano because this allows for spurious reflections and highly reflective objects close to the sensor to avoid saturation of the sensors. Referring to claim 12, Schönlieb shows wherein controlling the photo-sensitive sensor pixel to selectively store the first part of the charge carriers generated during the at least one of the plurality of first ToF measurements in the at least two charge storages comprises: controlling the photo-sensitive sensor pixel to increase a ratio of the first part of the charge carriers selectively stored in the at least two charge storages with increasing distance of the ToF sensor to an the object located in the scene causing the incident light (see page 269 column 1 first paragraph). Referring to claim 13, Schönlieb wherein different time offsets are used respectively for the plurality of first ToF measurements between a respective sequence of modulated light pulses emitted to the scene during the a respective first ToF measurement and one or more respective drive signal signals used to drive the photo-sensitive sensor pixel during the respective first ToF measurement (see page 266 column 1 paragraph 3 where the modulation of the TOF sensor is Fmod). Referring to claim 27, the combination of Schönlieb and Tadano shows wherein a course of a ratio of the respective correlation function of any two of the first ToF measurements is strictly monotonic decreasing or strictly monotonic increasing in the measurement range of the ToF sensor (see Tadano paragraph 109 and 110). Note the motivation of the combination for the correlation functions is shown in the rejection of claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-11, 14-26, and 29 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUKE D RATCLIFFE whose telephone number is (571)272-3110. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM-5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Isam Alsomiri can be reached at 571-272-6970. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUKE D RATCLIFFE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 31, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638565
Laser Safety Comparator
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12625288
ULTRAFAST 3D IMAGING TECHNIQUE EMPLOYING EVENT-DRIVEN CAMERAS
4y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618977
OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A HOSTILE OPTICAL COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613338
NON-SOLID MATERIAL DETECTION METHOD, NON-SOLID MATERIAL DETECTION DEVICE, DISTANCE COMPUTING DEIVCE, DISTANCE COMPUTING METHOD
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12591049
TRANSMIT SIGNAL DESIGN FOR AN OPTICAL DISTANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month