Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/825,149

TWO-COMPONENT DEVELOPER AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 26, 2022
Priority
Jun 09, 2021 — JP 2021-096640
Examiner
SEILER, GRANT STEVEN
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
5 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
30%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 27 resolved
-5.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -29% lift
Without
With
+-29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks filed 2026-02-25, with respect to the rejection of claims 1 – 11 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. §103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a rejection on new grounds is made in view of Nakazawa et al (US PGP 2010/0124715), Harada et al (US PGP 2015/0376412), and Uchino et al (US PGP 2016/0282742). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakazawa et al (US PGP 2010/0124715) in view of Harada et al (US PGP 2015/0376412), further in view of Uchino et al (US PGP 2016/0282742). Nakazawa teaches a toner (Abstract) which may be used alongside a carrier in a two-component developer ([0166]). Nakazawa teaches that the volume-average particle diameter of the toner particles is preferably 5 – 9 µm ([0108]), encompassing the range stated in Claim 1. Nakazawa teaches that an external additive may be added to the toner particles ([0090]), which may be titanium oxide ([0091]). The external additive is preferably added in an amount of 0.01 – 20 parts by mass relative to 100 parts of toner particles ([0092]), reading on the range stated in Claim 1. Nakazawa teaches that the toner may include a colorant ([0081]), but does not give a detailed description of pigments having particular absorption maxima. Additionally, while Nakazawa does describe a carrier having a resin coating ([0169], [0171]), no preference is stated for the exposure ratio of the core particle of the carrier. Harada teaches a black pigment composition for use as an alternative to carbon black in electrophotographic toners ([0002]). Use of the pigment composition taught by Harada improves the performance of a toner by suppressing charge leakage and resisting color fading ([0009]). Harada teaches that a pigment composition which achieves these improvements contains at least a first pigment having a λmax of 460 – 530 nm and a second pigment having a λmax of 600 – 700 nm ([0012]) when measured as a dispersion in MEK ([0018]), reading on the ranges stated for instant P1 and P2, respectively. Uchino teaches a two-component developer containing toner particles and carrier particles ([0012]). The carrier particles comprise core particles with a coating on their surface ([0017]). Uchino teaches that the coating does not completely cover the surface of the carrier core particles, and that the exposed area of the core material which is not covered by the coating resin, as measured by XPS, is 10 – 18% of the surface ([0031], [0033] – [0034]). Controlling the exposed area ratio of the coated core particles of the carrier suppresses image defects and preserves the quality of printed images ([0031]). While Uchino’s “exposed area” is calculated by a different formula than the “iron element content” of the instant application, the two values calculated for a given carrier are expected to be similar. Therefore, the carrier particles of Uchino would have “iron element content” values in a range overlapping that stated in Claim 1. In preparing the two-component developer of Nakazawa, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to suppress charge leakage of the toner and resist color fading by incorporating the pigment composition taught by Harada. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to suppress image defects and enhance the quality of printed images by controlling the exposed area ratio of the carrier in the range taught by Uchino. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to prepare the two-component developer of Nakazawa, wherein the toner includes the pigment composition of Harada and the carrier has an area exposure ratio controlled in the range taught by Uchino, resulting in a developer described by Claim 1. As mentioned above, Harada teaches a first pigment having a λmax of 460 – 530 nm ([0012]), reading on the range stated in Claim 2. Harada points out as examples of pigments having a λmax of 460 – 530 nm C.I. Pigment Brown 23, 25, and 41, and C.I. Pigment Red 38 ([0033] – [0034]), covering the list stated in Claim 3. Harada points out as examples of pigments have a λmax of 600 – 700 nm C.I. Pigment Blue 15, 15:1, 15:2, 15:3, 15:4, 15:5, 15:6, and 16 ([0035]), covering the list stated in Claim 4. Harada also teaches that a third and/or fourth pigment may be included in the composition ([0036]). The optionally included third pigment has a λmax of 530 – 600 nm, the same as the range stated in Claim 5. Harada points out as examples of pigments having a λmax of 530 – 600 nm C.I. Pigment Violet 19, 23 and 32; C.I. Pigment Red 31, 48:4, 57:1, 122, 146, 147, 150, 184, 238, 242, 254, and 269; and C.I. Pigment Orange 34, 36, 38, 43, 62, 68, 70, 72, and 74 ([0037]), covering the list stated in Claim 6. Harada teaches that the optionally included fourth pigment has a λmax of 400 – 460 nm ([0038]), the same as the range stated in Claim 7. Harada points out as examples of pigments having a λmax of 400 – 460 nm C.I. Pigment Yellow 74, 120, 139, 151, 155, 180, 181, 185, and 213; and C.I. Pigment Green 7 and 36 ([0039] – [0040]), covering the list stated in Claim 8. Nakazawa teaches a binder resin of the toner containing a crystalline polyester (Abstract, [0022]), reading on Claim 9. Uchino teaches that the coating resin on the surface of the carrier particle cores is derived from an alicyclic (meth)acrylate ([0068]), satisfying Claim 10. Uchino teaches that another monomer may be copolymerized with the alicyclic (meth)acrylate ([0070]), and then states a preference for chain (meth)acrylates, which are the simple short-chain alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid ([0070]). Uchino teaches that the preferred mass ratio of alicyclic (meth)acrylate to chain (meth)acrylate content may be as large as 90:10, overlapping the range stated in Claim 11. Uchino teaches that the core particle of the carrier preferably has a value for SF-1 of 100 – 130, overlapping the range stated in Claim 13. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Grant S Seiler whose telephone number is (571)272-3015. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 - 5:30 Pacific. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT STEVEN SEILER/ Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 04/27/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 25, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 20, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12663734
TONER
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656700
Toner, Toner Cartridge, and Image-Forming Device
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645162
TONER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12631980
YELLOW TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12607950
TONER
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
30%
With Interview (-29.2%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month