Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/825,753

ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICE FOR ELEVATOR BRAKE, ELEVATOR BRAKE AND ELEVATOR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 26, 2022
Examiner
DHAKAL, BICKEY
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Otis Elevator Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
616 granted / 732 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 2-11 are objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase “an elevator brake” in line 1 should be re-written as “the elevator brake” because claim 1 already discloses “an elevator brake”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 7-12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WU CN207226893U. Regarding claim 1, WU discloses An electromagnetic device (Figs. 1-3) for an elevator brake, wherein the electromagnetic device is configured to be provided in the number of at least two (Electromagnets 2 and 3) in the elevator brake, and each of the electromagnetic devices comprises: a fixed member (Item 13), which is fixed relative to an elevator power device (The traction motor base) and provided with at least one electromagnetic member (Item 2) for providing an electromagnetic force after being energized PNG media_image1.png 693 931 media_image1.png Greyscale ; a movable member (Item 9), which is arranged between the fixed member and a friction (Item 11) member of the elevator brake, and arranged to be movable relative to the fixed member (Item 9 is arranged between items 13 and 11 when view in counterclockwise direction); and a force supply member (Item 14), which is arranged to provide a force in an opposite direction to the electromagnetic force to the movable member, so that when the elevator brake is in a first state (Away), the movable member is driven by the force to move toward the friction member and bring the friction member into contact with the elevator power device to provide a braking force for stopping an elevator car (Elevator). PNG media_image2.png 88 869 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 290 866 media_image3.png Greyscale WU does not explicitly disclose and when the elevator brake is in a second state, the electromagnetic force is provided to overcome the force to urge the movable member to move toward the fixed member so that the friction member is out of contact with the elevator power device. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective fling date of the claimed invention to disengage the brake after the brake has been applied is a necessary step during the normal operation of the elevator, which is a second state where the electromagnetic force is provided to overcome the force to urge the movable member to move toward the fixed member so that the friction member is out of contact with the elevator power device. The brake is engaged and disengaged during its operation which PHOSITA would appreciate. Therefore, the feature of the second state as mentioned above includes nothing more than normal control of the elevator brake. Regarding claim 2, WU discloses , wherein the electromagnetic device further comprises a damper (Item 10) arranged between the fixed member and the movable member. PNG media_image4.png 71 867 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, WU discloses , wherein the fixed member is fixedly connected to the elevator power device after passing through the movable member via a connector (Item 5). PNG media_image5.png 160 853 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, WU discloses , wherein a guide bushing (Nut) is provided between the connector and the movable member. PNG media_image6.png 183 975 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, WU discloses , wherein the fixed member and the movable member are configured into an I-shape, a V-shape, or a U-shape (Fig. 3 shows I shaped fixed and movable members). Regarding claim 10, WU discloses , wherein the movable member is configured into a flat plate shape (Fig. 3 shows I shaped fixed and movable members). Regarding claim 11, WU discloses , wherein the force supply member comprises a spring arranged between the fixed member and the movable member. PNG media_image7.png 391 938 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, WU discloses An elevator brake, comprising at least two electromagnetic devices for the elevator brake according to claim 1, wherein the electromagnetic device is arranged such that in the first state, the force provided by the force supply member drives the movable member to move toward the friction member and brings the friction member into contact with the elevator power device to provide a braking force for stopping the elevator car, and that in the second state, the electromagnetic force is provided to overcome the force to urge the movable member to move toward the fixed member, so that the friction member is out of contact with the elevator power device (See claim 1 rejection for detail). PNG media_image8.png 627 975 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, WU discloses , wherein the elevator brake comprises at least two electromagnetic devices that are different from each other (Fig. 3 shows two separate sets of electromagnetic devices). Regarding claim 15, WU discloses An elevator system (fig. 3), comprising the elevator brake according to claim 12 (See claim 12 rejection for detail). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3 discloses details of the electromagnetic member and claim 13 discloses an orientation of the electromagnetic devices. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. IIIan et al. (US 2013/0081905 A1) disclose a brake assembly. Bitzi et al. (US 2017/0291794 A1) an elevator brake. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BICKEY DHAKAL whose telephone number is (571)272-3577. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached at 5712722078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BICKEY DHAKAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600598
ELEVATOR SYSTEM HAVING A LASER DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603592
BATTERY HEATING SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE THEREOF AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595153
ELEVATOR CAR IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589972
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN ELEVATOR INSTALLATION BY USING A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED MOBILE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592658
METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRIC MACHINE, DEVICE FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRIC MACHINE, AND ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month