Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/826,382

ELECTRIC RANGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 27, 2022
Priority
May 28, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0069396
Examiner
THONG, YEONG JUEN
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
75 granted / 153 resolved
-21.0% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+52.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.2%
+49.2% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 153 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 10th 2026 has been entered. Claims Status: Claims 1-7, 9-14 and 16-20 are pending. Claims 8 and 15 are cancelled. Claims 1, 9-13 and 18-19 are amended. Claims 1-7, 9-14 and 16-20 are examined as follow: Claim Interpretation Applicant is encouraged to understand the important examiner interpretation below: It is expressed that it is within reasonable broadest interpretation for the limitation “…interfering …” would include the interpretation of organizing the electric wire such that would not touching1 (refer to footnote #1, come in collision would be considered as touching) the “heater”, which prior art of record disclosed in the drawing. It is also expressed that it is within reasonable boardiest interpretation for the term limitation “…accommodated…” would include the interpretation of not restricting, obstructing or in contact2 (refer to footnote #2, make room for would be considered as not restricting, obstructing or in contact) with other not intended structure to the wire, , which the prior art of records disclosed in the drawing. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-6, 8, 12-13, 15-16, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schilling et al (US7786414B2 previously cited) herein set forth as Schilling, in view of Eckman et al (US5780817 newly cited) herein set forth as Eckman. Regarding claim 1, Schilling discloses an electric range (#50, fig.7), comprising: a case (#54, fig.7); a cover plate (#51, fig.7) coupled to an upper end of the case (#54, fig.7) and having an upper surface on which an object to be heated is disposed; at least one heater (#13-#15 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) disposed below the cover plate (#51, fig.7) and configured to heat the object to be heated; and a first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) disposed below the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) to support the at least one heater (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5), and in which a recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5 ) and an insertion hole (#27, fig.1 and 4-5) are formed at a position (refer the position of edge #20 annotated in fig. 1b, 5 and 5) corresponding to an edge (refer to the edge of heater of #13-#15 and #25 in fig. 1a-b and 4-5) of the at least one heater (#13-#15 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5), wherein a first electric wire (#19, fig.1a or #16a & b in fig. 1a) is disposed in a first space (refer as the space the wire #19 between #18 and #25 in fig.1), the first space (refer as the space the wire #19 between #18 and #25 in fig.1) being formed between the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) and the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5), and wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5) is disposed below the first space (refer as the space the wire #19 between #18 and #25 in fig.1) and accommodates the first electric wire to prevent the first electric wire (#19, fig.1a or #16a & b in fig. 1a also refer to Col 6 line 24-27 cited: “…The support device 20 also has holes 27, through which can be passed downwards the terminals 16 of induction coil 13 and the terminals 19 of temperature sensor 18 …” and Col 7 line 52-54 cited: “…Above the same is again placed the correspondingly shaped aluminium plate 26, which at the same locations has holes 27 and also the support device 20, particularly for the passage of connections …” ) from interfering (refer to the claim interpretation section above) with the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) (refer to fig. 4-5 for clearer drawing of fig.1a and b). PNG media_image1.png 480 521 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 742 719 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 498 539 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 632 587 media_image4.png Greyscale Schilling does not discloses wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion, which has a non- through structure. In the similar field of stove element for electric range, Eckman discloses wherein a first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed in a first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2), the first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2) being formed between the at least one heater (#10, fig.2) and the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), and first bracket (#12, fig.2) and extending in a widthwise direction (refer to “widthwise direction annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), wherein an extending electric wire (refer to “extending electric wire” annotated in fig.2) from the first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed through the first bracket (#12, fig.2) via the insertion hole (refer to #30’s hole in fig.2) formed at a position corresponding to an edge (refer to “edge of heater” annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), and wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), which has a non- through structure (refer to the none-through structure of “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2). PNG media_image5.png 291 586 media_image5.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Schilling’s electric range with wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion, which has a non- through structure, as taught by Eckman, in order to provide stove element that is efficient and reduce electric shock risk, such that be safer to operate and/or replacement the stove element (refer to Col 1, line 47 to 51 cited: “…there is a need for an electrical resistance stove element which can be easily replaced by homeowners, but which is efficient to use and does not pose a risk of serious electric shock…”). Regarding claim 2, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling further discloses wherein the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) includes a core frame (#20, fig. 1a, 4-5) mounted in a first region (refer to whole area of #26 in fig 1a, 4-5, a clearer drawing description in fig. 4) on the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5), and at least a portion (note: the annotated “recessed portion” connected to central #27 is also on #26) of the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5) is formed on an inner side (refer to fig.1b and 4, the side that #26 that is facing the #20 in fig.1a, 4-5) of the first region (refer to whole area of #26 in fig 1a, 4-5, a clearer drawing description in fig. 4) of the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 3, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 2, Schilling further discloses wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5) extends in a direction corresponding to a widthwise direction (refer to fig. 5, since #20 is circular, any direction is considered as widthwise) of the core frame (#20, fig. 1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 4, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 2, Schilling further discloses wherein a first side (refer to the annotated “recessed portion” opening that facing #20 in fig. 4-5) of the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5) is formed at a position (refer the annotated “recessed portion” connected to central #27’s position on #26 n fig. 4-5) of the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) corresponding to a central portion (refer to the center of #27 on #20 in fig.1a, 4-5) of the core frame (#20, fig. 1a, 4-5), and a second side (refer to the opposite side of #24’s side closer to #27 in fig. 1a, 4-5) of the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5) is formed at a position (refer the annotated “recessed portion” connected to central #27’s position in fig. 4-5) of the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) corresponding to an edge (refer to “#20 edge” annotated in fig.1b, 4-5) of the core frame (#20, fig. 1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 5, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 2, Schilling further discloses wherein a boundary (refer to the boundary of #27 on #26 in fig.4) of the first region (refer to boundary line of area of #26 in fig 1a, 4-5, a clearer drawing description in fig. 4) of the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) has a same shape as an edge (refer to annotated “#20 edge” in fig.5 and the edge of #20 in fig.1b, 4-5) of the core frame (#20, fig. 1a, 4-5) (refer to fig.4 for clearer looks of “same shape”). Regarding claim 6, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling further discloses a sensor (#18, fig.1a) mounted on the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5), wherein the first electric wire (#19, fig.1a) is a portion of an electric wire (#19, fig.1a) electrically connected to the sensor (#18, fig.1a). Regarding claim 8, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling further discloses wherein an insertion hole (refer as the central #27 on #26, fig.1a, 4) is formed in the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5), and an electric wire (refer as any portion of #19, fig.1a) extending from the first electric wire (#19 wire in fig.1a) toward a first side (referring the direction of #19 extending in fig.1a) passes through the insertion hole (refer as the central #27 on #26, fig.1a and 4) and is disposed below the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 9, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling does not disclose wherein the insertion hole is spaced apart from the recessed portion. In the similar field of stove element for electric range, Eckman further discloses wherein a first bracket (#12 fig.2) for supporting the heating unit (#10, fig.2), the first bracket (#12, fig.2) has a recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2) and the insert hole (#16, fig.1) that is spaced apart (refer to fig.1 and noted that #16 and #12 spaced apart). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Schilling’s recessed portion with the insertion hole is spaced apart from the recessed portion, as taught by Eckman, in order to provide more space and distance between the recessed portion and insertion hole, such that the wiring would not be bunched together at the same area. Regarding claim 10, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 9, Schilling further discloses wherein the insertion hole (refer as the central #27 on #26 in fig.4) partially overlaps an edge (refer to “#20 edge” annotated in fig.1b 4-5, especially in fig.1b arrow pointing the overlap edge) of the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 11, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 9, Schilling further discloses wherein the insertion hole (refer as the central #27 on #26, fig.1a, and 4) does not to overlap (refer to “outside edges” annotated in fig.5,) an edge (refer to “outside edge” annotated in fig.5) of the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 12, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 8, Schilling further discloses wherein the insertion hole (refer to the central #27 on #26 in fig.4-5) is connected to the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 13, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 8, Schilling further discloses wherein a second bracket (#32, fig.1a, 5) disposed below the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) and on which a circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) is mounted, wherein the electric wire (#19, fig.1a) extending toward the first side (refer to fig.1a, where #19 is connect to #31 ) is electrically connected to the circuit board (#32-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5). Regarding claim 14, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling does not disclose wherein an edge of the recessed portion is bent upward and connected to the first bracket. In the similar field of stove element for electric range, Eckman further discloses a first bracket (#12, fig.2) for supporting the heating unit (#10, fig.2), the first bracket (#12, fig.2) has a recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2) and an insert hole (refer to #30’s hole in fig.2), wherein an edge (referring the upward bent of “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2) of the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2) is bent upward and connected to the first bracket (#12, fig.2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substitute Schilling’s recessed portion with Eckman’s recessed portion, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have been able to carry out such a substitution, and such substitution would have yielded predictable result of support for heating unit and accommodation and prevent interfering. Regarding claim 16, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling further discloses wherein the at least one heater (#13-#15, and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) includes a working coil (#13-#15 and #16a & b, fig.1a, 4-5), and wherein the first electric wire (#16a & b, fig.1a) is a portion of the working coil (#13-#15 and #16a & b, fig.1a, 4-5). Regarding claim 18, Schilling discloses an electric range (#50, fig.7), comprising: a case (#54, fig.7); a cover plate (#51, fig.7) coupled to an upper end of the case (#54, fig.7); at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) disposed below the cover plate (#51, fig.7); a sensor (#18, fig.1a) mounted on the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5); a first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) configured to support the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) and in which a recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig. 4-5) and a passing-through portion (refer to the central #27 on #26, fig.1a, 4-5) are formed; and a second bracket (#32, fig.1a, 5) disposed below the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) and on which a circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) is mounted, wherein the sensor (#18, fig.1a) is electrically connected to the circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) by an electric wire (#19, fig.1a), wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5 ) has a closed shape of a closed shape (Examiner note: a recessed portion inherently has a closed shape and an opened shape further detailed explanation refer to respond to argument below), wherein a first electric wire (refer to any portion of #19 in fig.1a) of the electric wire (#19, fig.1a), which is disposed in a first space (refer as the space the wire #19 between #18 and #25 in fig.1), the first space (refer as the space the wire #19 between #18 and #25 in fig.1) being formed between the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) and the first bracket (#20, fig.1a, 4-5) and a second electric wire (refer to any other portion of #19 in fig. 1a) extending from the first electric wire (refer to any portion of #19 in fig.1a) of the electric wire (#19, fig.1a) is electrically connected to the circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) through the passing-through portion (#27, fig.1a, 4-5). PNG media_image1.png 480 521 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 742 719 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 498 539 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 632 587 media_image4.png Greyscale Schilling does not discloses wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion, which has a non- through structure. In the similar field of stove element for electric range, Eckman discloses wherein a first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed in a first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2), the first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2) being formed between the at least one heater (#10, fig.2) and the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), and first bracket (#12, fig.2) and extending in a widthwise direction (refer to “widthwise direction annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), wherein an extending electric wire (refer to “extending electric wire” annotated in fig.2) from the first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed through the first bracket (#12, fig.2) via the insertion hole (refer to #30’s hole in fig.2) formed at a position corresponding to an edge (refer to “edge of heater” annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), and wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), which has a non- through structure (refer to the none-through structure of “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2). PNG media_image5.png 291 586 media_image5.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Schilling’s electric range with wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion prevents, which has a non- through structure, as taught by Eckman, in order to provide stove element that is efficient and reduce electric shock risk, such that be safer to operate and/or replacement the stove element (refer to Col 1, line 47 to 51 cited: “…there is a need for an electrical resistance stove element which can be easily replaced by homeowners, but which is efficient to use and does not pose a risk of serious electric shock…”). Regarding claim 19, Schilling discloses an electric range (#50, fig.7), comprising: a case (#54, fig.7); a cover plate (#51, fig.7) coupled to an upper end of the case (#54, fig.7); at least one heating unit (#13-#16a&b, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) including a working coil (#13-#15 and #16a & b, fig.1a, 4-5) disposed below the cover plate (#51, fig.7); a sensor (#18, fig.1a) mounted on the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5); a first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) configured to support the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5)and in which a recess (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig. 4-5), and at least one hole (#27, fig.1a, 4-5) adjacent to the recess (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig. 4-5) are formed; and a second bracket (#32, fig.1a, 5) disposed below the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) and on which a circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) is mounted, wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.4-5 connected to central #27 on #26 in fig. 4-5 ) has a closed shape (Examiner note: a recessed portion inherently has a closed shape and an opened shape further detailed explanation refer to respond to argument below), wherein the sensor (#18, fig.1a) is electrically connected to the circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) by a first electric wire (#19, fig. 1a), which is disposed between the at least one heating unit (#13-#15, #18 and #25 in fig.1a, 4-5) and the first bracket (#26, fig.1a, 4-5) #19, fig.1a or #16a & b in fig. 1a also refer to Col 6 line 24-27 cited: “…The support device 20 also has holes 27, through which can be passed downwards the terminals 16 of induction coil 13 and the terminals 19 of temperature sensor 18 …” and Col 7 line 52-54 cited: “…Above the same is again placed the correspondingly shaped aluminium plate 26, which at the same locations has holes 27 and also the support device 20, particularly for the passage of connections …” ) from interfering (refer to the claim interpretation section above) with the at least one heater and wherein a second electric wire (refer to the second #19 in fig. 1a) extending from the first electric wire (#19, fig.1a, the two #19 are connected, therefore they are extending each other) is electrically connected to the circuit board (#31-#35, #37 fig.1a, 5) through the at least one hole (#27, fig.1a, 4-5). PNG media_image1.png 480 521 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 742 719 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 498 539 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 632 587 media_image4.png Greyscale Schilling does not disclose wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion, which has a non- through structure. In the similar field of stove element for electric range, Eckman discloses wherein a first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed in a first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2), the first space (refer to “first space” annotated in fig.2) being formed between the at least one heater (#10, fig.2) and the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), and first bracket (#12, fig.2) and extending in a widthwise direction (refer to “widthwise direction annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), wherein an extending electric wire (refer to “extending electric wire” annotated in fig.2) from the first electric wire (refer to “first electric wire” annotated in fig.2) is disposed through the first bracket (#12, fig.2) via the insertion hole (refer to #30’s hole in fig.2) formed at a position corresponding to an edge (refer to “edge of heater” annotated in fig.2) of the at least one heater (#10, fig.2), and wherein the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2), which has a non- through structure (refer to the none-through structure of “recessed portion” annotated in fig.2). PNG media_image5.png 291 586 media_image5.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Schilling’s electric range with wherein a first electric wire is disposed in a first space, the first space being formed between the at least one heater and the recessed portion, and first bracket and extending in a widthwise direction of the at least one heater, wherein an extending electric wire from the first electric wire is disposed through the first bracket via the insertion hole formed at a position corresponding to an edge of the at least one heater, and wherein the recessed portion prevents, which has a non- through structure, as taught by Eckman, in order to provide stove element that is efficient and reduce electric shock risk, such that be safer to operate and/or replacement the stove element (refer to Col 1, line 47 to 51 cited: “…there is a need for an electrical resistance stove element which can be easily replaced by homeowners, but which is efficient to use and does not pose a risk of serious electric shock…”). Regarding claim 20, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 19, Schilling further discloses wherein the sensor (#18, fig.1a) comprise a temperature sensor (#18, fig.1a, and refer as temperature sensor #18 in Col 6 line 16). Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schilling et al (US7786414B2 previously cited) herein set forth as Schilling, in view of Eckman et al (US5780817 newly cited) herein set forth as Eckman, and further in view of Logan (US5828038 previously cited) herein set forth as Logan. Regarding claim 17, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 1, Schilling or Eckman does not disclose wherein the first bracket includes a first plate forming a bottom surface of the first bracket and a second plate bent upward or downward from an edge of the first plate, wherein the recessed portion is formed in a first region of the first plate, and wherein the at least one heating unit is mounted above the first region of the first plate. In the similar field of electric range structure, Logan discloses a first bracket (#12, #14, #16 and #20, fig.1) for supporting the heating unit (#10, fig.1), the first bracket (#12, #14, #16 and #20, fig.1) has a recessed portion (#12, fig.1) and an insert hole (#16, fig.1); wherein the first bracket (#12, #14, #16 and #20, fig.1) includes a first plate (referring the plate that forming #12 and bottom surface in fi.g1) forming a bottom surface (referring to the bottom surface form by @12 in fig.1) of the first bracket (#12, #14, #16 and #20, fig.1) and a second plate bent upward or downward (refer to “upward or downward bent” annotated in fig.1 below) from an edge (referring the edge of #12 at #14 infig.1) of the first plate (referring the plate that forming #12 and bottom surface in fi.g1), wherein the recessed portion (#12, fig.1) is formed in a first region (referring the recessed bowl shape of #12 formed in fig.1) of the first plate (referring the plate that forming #12 and bottom surface in fi.g1), and wherein the at least one heating unit (#10, fig.1) is mounted above the first region referring the recessed bowl shape of #12 formed in fig.1) of the first plate (referring the plate that forming #12 and bottom surface in fi.g1). PNG media_image6.png 532 752 media_image6.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substitute Schilling’s recessed portion and insertion hole with Logan’s recessed portion and insertion hole, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have been able to carry out such a substitution, and such substitution would have yielded predictable result of support for heating unit and accommodation and prevent interfering. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schilling et al (US7786414B2 previously cited) herein set forth as Schilling, in view of Eckman et al (US5780817 newly cited) herein set forth as Eckman, and further in view of Matsui et al (US9295110B2 previously cited) herein set forth as Matsui. Regarding claim 7, the modification of Schilling and Eckman discloses substantially all features set forth in claim 6, Schilling further discloses the sensor (#18, fig.1a) position does not interfere with the recessed portion (refer to “recessed portion” annotated in fig.5 connected to the central #27 on #26 in fig.1a, 4-5). Schilling does not specifically disclose a sensor bracket configured to mount the sensor on the core frame, wherein the sensor bracket is detachably mounted on the core frame. In the field of inductive heating device, Matsui discloses a sensor bracket (#12a, fig.4) configured to mount the sensor (#14, fig.4) on the core frame (#5A, fig. 4), wherein the sensor bracket (#12a, fig.4) is detachably mounted on the core frame (#5A, fig. 4). PNG media_image7.png 503 724 media_image7.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Schilling’s invention with a sensor bracket configured to mount the sensor on the core frame, wherein the sensor bracket is detachably mounted on the core frame and a portion of the recessed portion formed at a position corresponding to the mounting position of the sensor bracket has a shape that does not interfere with the sensor bracket, as taught by Matsui, in order to monitoring the temperature of the heated object and provide output signal for better control for heating the object. Response to Argument Applicant's arguments filed March 10th 2026 have been fully considered but moot in view of the new grounds of rejection with the newly cited secondary Prior art Eckman et al (US5780817 newly cited). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YEONG JUEN THONG whose telephone number is (571)272-6930. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helena Kosanovic can be reached at (571) 272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YEONG JUEN THONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3761 July 1st 2026 /JUSTIN C DODSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761 1 Refer to Merriam-Webster dictionary mean for “interfere” in web address https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interfere, especially on “come into collision or be in opposition”. 2 Refer to Merriam-Webster dictionary mean for “accommodate” in web address https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accommodate, especially on “make room for”.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12653340
OUTDOOR COOKING STATION WITH A PELLET FEEDER FOR SMOKING FOOD
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654953
Apparatus and Method For Flipping and Positioning Articles
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12645030
OPTICAL FIBER FUSION SPLICER AND METHOD FOR FUSION SPLICING OPTICAL FIBER
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641681
FAULT DETECTION DEVICE, LOAD DRIVING DEVICE, FAULT DETECTION METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616210
FOOD FORMING METHOD AND FORMING MECHANISM
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.1%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 153 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month