Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/828,115

VERTEBRAL JOINT IMPLANTS AND DELIVERY TOOLS

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
May 31, 2022
Examiner
RAMANA, ANURADHA
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Providence Medical Technology Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1022 granted / 1237 resolved
+12.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1274
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1237 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on September 22, 2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on September 22, 2025 has been entered. Upon further consideration, the Examiner is withdrawing the allowability of the subject matter indicated to be allowable in the previous office action in light of the rejections made in this office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claims 21 and 22, the recitation “the shaft” renders the claims vague and indefinite because it lacks antecedent basis. It appears that Applicant intended to recite “the implant shaft.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-9 and 11-22 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Winslow et al. (US 7763050) in view of Steffee (US 5443514). Regarding claims 1, 9, 21 and 22, Winslow et al. disclose a spinal facet implant system including: implant (600) configured for placement in a spinal facet joint space, the implant including: a leading distal portion and a trailing proximal portion (Fig. 8); and a facet screw 640 (col. 5, lines 26-67, cols. 6-7 and col. 8, lines 1-24). Regarding claims 6 and 14, Winslow et al. disclose the implant to have a wedge shape (Fig. 4). Regarding claims 7 and 15, Winslow et al. disclose the implant can be made of any suitable biocompatible material for e.g. metal or polymer (col. 5, lines 39-67, col. 6, lines 1-48). Regarding claims 8 and 16, Winslow et al. disclose the implant can be inserted utilizing a posterior access approach (abstract). Regarding claim 20, Winslow disclose the screw (240 or 640) to be inserted through the implant at an angle to engage an inferior vertebra (Figs. 4 and 9). Winslow et al. disclose all elements of the claimed invention except for an inserter or driver assembly for implant placement including: a hollow implant shaft having a proximal end, a distal end, a lumen having an inner diameter, and an outer diameter configured to allow the implant shaft to extend through a lumen of a delivery device; and a rod longitudinally displaceable within the implant shaft to release the implant from the driver assembly, and a handle coupled with the proximal end of the implant shaft. Steffee discloses an instrument with a hollow shaft 98 (Fig. 5); a rod 118 displaceable within the implant shaft 98 (Fig. 6); and a handle 84 (Fig. 6) coupled to the proximal end of the implant shaft 98 by means of rod 118 wherein the implant shaft has a distal end (Fig. 7) configured to clamp the implant by means of extensions 136 (Fig. 7) (col. 3, lines 24-68 and col. 4, lines 1-27). Regarding claims 3 and 11, rod 118 is displaceable about a longitudinal axis of the rod to further assist in releasing the implant from the driver assembly. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have utilized the Steffee instrument to firmly grip the Winslow et al. implant to permit placement of the implant and rotation into position. Response to Arguments The Terminal Disclaimer filed on September 22, 2025 has been approved, overcoming the double-patenting rejections made in the previous office action. New grounds of rejection have been made in this office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anu Ramana whose telephone number is (571)272-4718. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong can be reached at (571)272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. October 17, 2025 /Anu Ramana/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Feb 18, 2025
Response Filed
May 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Sep 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599414
RECEIVING PART FOR RECEIVING A ROD FOR COUPLING THE ROD TO A BONE ANCHORING ELEMENT AND A BONE ANCHORING DEVICE WITH SUCH A RECEIVING PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594102
SURGICAL SUTURE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594083
UNIVERSAL BROACH SYSTEM FOR HUMERAL IMPLANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594095
LAPAROSCOPIC WORKSPACE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589007
INTRADISCAL FIXATION SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.6%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1237 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month