Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/831,923

INFRARED ABSORPTION COMPOSITION, AND INFRARED ABSORPTION FILM, PHOTOELECTRIC DEVICE, SENSOR, IMAGE SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 03, 2022
Examiner
WHITELEY, JESSICA
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1317 granted / 1489 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1536
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1489 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 23-39 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on January 6, 2026. Applicant argues that all of the claims depend, either directly or indirectly, on claim 1 and, therefore, should not be restricted. This application is not a 371 PCT application and, therefore, that is not the standard to meet for restriction. The criteria for restriction was laid out in the require for restriction/election issued December 4, 2025. However, when the elected claims are determined to be in condition for allowance, rejoinder will be considered where possible. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-13, and 15-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gaudiana et al (US 2011/0284080). With regards to claims 1-3 and 5-10, Gaudiana teaches a photovoltaic cell (abstract) that includes a polymer (0007) that has the following repeating units: PNG media_image1.png 81 230 media_image1.png Greyscale (0009) wherein PNG media_image2.png 67 265 media_image2.png Greyscale (0009) (reading on formula 2) and PNG media_image3.png 141 212 media_image3.png Greyscale (0015) (reading on claimed formula 1). With regards to claims 11-12 and 15-20, Gaudiana teaches the polymer that has the following repeating units: PNG media_image1.png 81 230 media_image1.png Greyscale (0009) wherein PNG media_image2.png 67 265 media_image2.png Greyscale (0009) (reading on formula 2) With regards to claim 13, Gaudiana teaches the amount of the electron acceptor (reading on claimed formula 2) to be 50 to 90 molar % (0043) With regards to claim 21, Gaudiana teaches the monomer ratio to be 1.025 (0065). Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al (US 11,820,859). The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. With regards to claim 1, Lee teaches an infrared absorbing polymer that includes a first structural unit (abstract) having the following structure: PNG media_image4.png 138 119 media_image4.png Greyscale (column 1 lines 55-67) wherein PNG media_image5.png 787 286 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 524 267 media_image6.png Greyscale (column 2 line 1 to column 3 line 45) and a structural unit of formula 2 (abstract) which has the following structure: PNG media_image7.png 69 160 media_image7.png Greyscale (column 2 lines 35-41). With regards to claims 2 and 3, Lee teaches the Ar1 in formula 1 to be one of the following: PNG media_image8.png 114 237 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 302 237 media_image9.png Greyscale (column 3 line 55 to column 4 line 25). With regards to claim 4, Lee teaches the Ar1 in formula 1 above to be one of the following: PNG media_image10.png 314 261 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 230 212 media_image11.png Greyscale (column 4 line 40 to column 5 line 20). With regards to claim 5, Lee teaches the arene group or heteroarene group to have one of the following structures: PNG media_image12.png 209 267 media_image12.png Greyscale (column 17 lines 27-47). With regards to claim 6, Lee teaches the structure of formula 1 to include the following structure: PNG media_image13.png 120 264 media_image13.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 232 265 media_image14.png Greyscale (column 17 line 60 to column 18 line 20). With regards to claim 7, Lee teaches R1 and R2 to be linked together and the arene or heteroarene group to be one of the following: PNG media_image15.png 140 265 media_image15.png Greyscale (column 18 lines 37-50). With regards to claim 8, Lee teaches the moiety represented by B-3-1 to be one of the following: PNG media_image16.png 357 148 media_image16.png Greyscale (column 18 line 66 to column 19 line 32). With regards to claim 9, Lee teaches the Chemical Formula B-3-2 to have the following structure: PNG media_image17.png 245 156 media_image17.png Greyscale PNG media_image18.png 69 140 media_image18.png Greyscale (column 19 line 45 to column 20 line 7). With regards to claim 10, Lee teaches formula 1 to have the following structure: PNG media_image19.png 158 219 media_image19.png Greyscale (column 22 lines 28-67). With regards to claims 11-12 and 15-20, Lee teaches the infrared absorbing polymer to include the following: a structural unit of formula 2 (abstract) which has the following structure: PNG media_image7.png 69 160 media_image7.png Greyscale (column 2 lines 35-41). With regards to claim 13, Lee teaches the infrared absorbing polymer to include about 20 to about 50 mol% of the first structural unit and about 50 to about 80 mol% of the second structural unit (column 8, lines 64-67). With regards to claims 14 and 22, Lee teaches the infrared absorbing polymer to have a peak absorption in the wavelength from 750 to about 3000 nm (column 9, lines 22-25). With regards to claim 21, Lee teaches the ratio of p-type semiconductor to n-type semiconductor to be 1:9 to about 9:1 (column 27 lines 36-31). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA WHITELEY whose telephone number is (571)272-5203. The examiner can normally be reached 8 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at 5712721130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA WHITELEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600808
CROSSLINKABLE PREPOLYMERS FOR CHEMICALLY STABLE POLYMER GELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600888
DUAL-CURABLE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590264
PROFRAGRANCE CONJUGATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590265
1-NORBORNAN-2-YLPROPAN-2-ONE AS A FRAGRANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583833
Enrichment of a Diastereomer in Magnolan
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1489 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month