Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/838,371

COMPACT REJECT BIN

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 13, 2022
Examiner
MORRISON, THOMAS A
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Ncr Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
627 granted / 854 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
896
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 854 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 2. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/7/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 1-7 and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0103065 (Kotani) (hereinafter “Kotani”). Regarding claim 1, Figs. 1-3B show a bin for storing media items, comprising: an input channel (unnumbered channel to the right of reference numeral R1) for receiving a sequential series of media items (P); opposing driven rollers (122) for receiving the sequential series of media items (P) via the input channel (unnumbered channel to the right of reference numeral R1) and for pushing out each of the sequential series of media items (P); and a storage receptacle (including 21 and 22) for receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P) pushed out by the opposing driven rollers (122), the storage receptacle (including 21 and 22) having an annular-shaped storage cavity formed by a single inner cylindrical wall (21) and a single fixed outer wall (including 22), the fixed outer wall (including 22) forming a cylinder with a slot (slot at bottom of element 21) therein for receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P) into the annular-shaped storage cavity, the annular-shaped storage cavity being configured such that media items (P) received therein are free to rotate within the annular-shaped storage cavity as additional media items (P) are received. Regarding claim 2, Figs. 1-3B show an output channel (channel below element 23), wherein the opposing driven rollers (122) push out each of the sequential series of media items (P) into the output channel (channel below element 23), and wherein the storage receptacle receives each of the sequential series of media items (P) pushed out by the opposing driven rollers (122) via the output channel (channel below element 23). Regarding claim 3, Figs. 1-3B show that the fixed outer wall (including 22) of the storage receptacle comprises a ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) on an inner surface thereof. Regarding claim 4, Figs. 1-3B show that the ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) is positioned on a lower portion of the inner surface of the fixed outer wall (22). Regarding claim 5, Figs. 1-3B show that the fixed outer wall (including 22) of the storage receptacle comprises a plurality of ramp-like inward-facing protrusions (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2 and element 253 or element 211) on an inner surface thereof. Regarding claim 6, Figs. 1-3B show that each of the plurality of ramp-like inward-facing protrusions (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2 and element 253) is positioned on a lower portion of the inner surface of the fixed outer wall (including 22). Regarding claim 7, Figs. 1-3B show that the fixed outer wall (including 22) includes a cut-out region (at 23) configured so that media items positioned within the annular-shaped storage cavity can be accessed. Regarding claim 14, Figs. 1-3B show a bin for storing media items, comprising: an input channel (unnumbered channel to the right of reference numeral R1) for receiving a sequential series of media items (P); and a storage (including 21 and 22) receptacle for receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P), the receptacle having an annular-shaped storage cavity formed by a single inner cylindrical wall (21) and a single fixed outer wall (including 22), the fixed outer wall (including 22) forming a cylinder with a slot (slot at bottom of element 21) therein for receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P) into the annular-shaped storage cavity and having a ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) on an inner surface thereof, the annular-shaped storage cavity being configured such that media items (P) received therein are free to rotate within the annular-shaped storage cavity as additional media items (P) are received. Regarding claim 15, Figs. 1-3B show that the ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) is positioned on a lower portion of the inner surface of the fixed outer wall (including 22). Regarding claim 16, Figs. 1-3B disclose a method for storing media items (P), comprising: receiving a sequential series of media items (P) via an input channel (unnumbered channel to the right of reference numeral R1); pushing out each of the sequential series of media items (P) via opposing driven rollers (122); and receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P) pushed out by the opposing driven rollers (122) at a storage receptacle, the storage receptacle having an annular-shaped storage cavity formed by a single inner cylindrical wall (21) and a single fixed outer wall (including 22), the fixed outer wall (including 22) forming a cylinder with a slot (slot at bottom of element 21) therein for receiving each of the sequential series of media items (P) into the annular-shaped storage cavity, wherein media items (P) received within the annular-shaped storage cavity are free to rotate within the annular-shaped storage cavity as additional media items (P) are received. Regarding claim 17, Figs. 1-3B show that the fixed outer wall (including 22) of the storage receptacle comprises a ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) on an inner surface thereof. Regarding claim 18, Figs. 1-3B show that the ramp-like inward-facing protrusion (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2) is positioned on a lower portion of the inner surface of the fixed outer wall (including 22). Regarding claim 19, Figs. 1-3B show that the fixed outer wall (including 22) of the storage receptacle comprises a plurality of ramp-like inward-facing protrusions (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2 and element 253) on an inner surface thereof. Regarding claim 20, Figs. 1-6 show that each of the plurality of ramp-like inward-facing protrusions (unnumbered protrusion to the left of element 122 in Fig. 2 and element 253) is positioned on a lower portion of the inner surface of the fixed outer wall (including 22). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claims 9-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kotani as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of U.S. Patent No. 9,926,164 (Jeschke et al.) (hereinafter “Jeschke”) (a reference of record). With regard to claims 9 and 10, Kotani shows an upper roller and a lower roller both labeled 122, but does not show plural upper rollers and plural lower rollers on shafts, as claimed. With regard to claim 10, Kotani also does not show first and second gears, as claimed. Jeschke shows that it is well-known in the art to provide a bin with first and second central shafts (116 and 120) and opposing driven rollers (118 and 122) that include upper rollers (118) coupled to each other via the first central shaft (116) and lower rollers (122) coupled to each other via the second central shaft (122), a first gear (126) connected to the first central shaft (116) and a second gear (138) connected to the second central shaft (120), the first gear (126) coupled to the second gear (138) such that the upper rollers (118) roll in a first direction (counter-clockwise) and the lower rollers (122) roll in a second direction (clockwise) that is opposite the first direction (counter-clockwise) when one of the first gear (126) or the second gear (138) is driven, for feeding sheets into a storage receptacle (including 42 and 108). Because both Jeschke and Kotani teach roller arrangements for feeding sheets into storage receptacles, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to substitute the roller arrangement of Jeschke for the roller arrangement of Kotani to achieve the predictable result of feeding sheets into a storage receptacle, as set forth in claims 9 and 10. Regarding claim 11, Jeschke shows a motor (134) coupled to one of the first gear (126) or the second gear (138) to drive the upper rollers (118) and the lower rollers (122). Regarding claim 12, Jeschke shows that the motor (134) comprises a driven shaft coupled to one of the first gear (126) or the second gear (138) via a gear and belt assembly (including 136 and 130). See, e.g., Fig. 5 of Jeschke. Regarding claim 13, as best understood, Fig. 9 of Jeschke shows that the motor (134) is positioned within a cylindrical area formed by the inner wall (108) of the storage receptacle (including 42 and 108). Figure 9 of Jeschke shows that behind inner wall 108, a cylindrical area is formed and motor 134 is located in this cylindrical area, as claimed. Response to Arguments 5. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 6-10 of the response, filed 1/7/2026, with respect to the rejection of claims 1-7 and 14-20 under 35 U.S.C.102(a)(1) and the rejection of claims 10-13 under 35 U.S.C.103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, new grounds of rejection are made in view of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0103065 (Kotani) by itself and in combination with U.S. Patent No. 9,926,164 (Jeschke et al.). Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS A MORRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-7221. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mike McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THOMAS A MORRISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
May 23, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 04, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 07, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600593
DOCUMENT TRANSPORT DEVICE INCLUDING STOPPER FOR PREVENTION OF FALLING OF DOCUMENT AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589962
MEDIUM CONVEYANCE DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589961
MEDIUM TRANSPORT APPARATUS, MEDIUM PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND RECORDING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583698
SHEET CONVEYING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583696
DOCUMENT FEED DEVICE WITH ASCENDABLE DOCUMENT GUIDE MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 854 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month