Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 17/840,399

LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING A DATABASE OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MULTISPECTRAL CIRCADIAN RHYTHM LIGHTING SCENARIO AND PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS INDEX AND THE METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 14, 2022
Priority
Jun 15, 2021 — provisional 63/210,686
Examiner
SMITH, EMILIE ALINE
Art Unit
1686
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Lawrence Lin
OA Round
2 (Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
38 granted / 77 resolved
-10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
106
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§103
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 77 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s Response Applicant’s response, filed 05/15/2026, has been fully considered. Rejections and/or objections not reiterated from previous Office Actions are hereby withdrawn. The following rejections and/or objections are either reiterated or newly applied. They constitute the complete set presently being applied to the instant application. Claims Status Claims 2, 4, 10, and 14 have been canceled. Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-13, and 15-20 are pending. Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-13, and 15-20 are examined. Withdrawn Objections/Rejections The objection to the drawings is withdrawn in view of the replacement drawings filed 05/15/2026. The objection to claim 1 is withdrawn in view of the amendments submitted. The rejection of claim 1 under 35 USC 112(a) is withdrawn in view of the amendments submitted. The rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-13, and 15-20 under 35 USC 112(b) is withdrawn in view of the amendments submitted. The rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 USC 103 over Wingren et al. is withdrawn in view of the amendments submitted. The provisional rejection of claims 1-20 on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting over the claims of copending Application No. 17/840903 is withdrawn in view of the filing of the Terminal Disclaimer. Terminal Disclaimer The Terminal Disclaimer filed 05/15/2026 is accepted. Drawings The drawings filed 05/15/2026 are accepted. Claim Objections Claims 1, 5, and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, on page 2, “electing one of the multispectral lighting parameters” should read “selecting one of the multispectral lighting parameters” In claim 5, “the light-emitting device comprises a direct lighting lamp group and an indirect lighting group” should read “the light-emitting device comprises a direct lighting lamp group and an indirect lighting lamp group” In claim 11, “a lighting system composed of a light device” should read “a lighting system composed of a light-emitting device” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-13, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. This is a new rejection necessitated by claim amendments. With respect to claim 1, the claim recites the limitation of “wherein the database of correlations between multispectral circadian rhythm lighting scenarios and psychological stress indices is established through the following procedures comprising…”. The claim is indefinite because it is unclear if the establishing steps are performed within the metes and bounds of the claims or if the steps are performed before outside of the claim. With respect to claim 11, the claim recites the limitation of “the multispectral lighting parameters are corresponding to a plurality of specific color temperatures, and the specific color temperatures are acquired by a plurality of establishing steps conducted on a plurality of testers, wherein the establishing steps comprises…”. The claim is indefinite because it is unclear if the establishing steps are performed within the metes and bounds of the method or are instead performed outside of the steps of the claim. The remaining claims are rejected due to their dependency upon an indefinite claim without remedying the indefiniteness. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Emilie A Smith whose telephone number is (571)272-7543. The examiner can normally be reached 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Larry D Riggs can be reached at (571)270-3062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.A.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1686 /OLIVIA M. WISE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1685
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12725003
IDENTIFICATION OF CONVERGENT ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY SEQUENCE PATTERNS
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725676
DNA MATRIX PROCESSING METHOD BASED ON COMBINED RESTRICTION DIGESTION MECHANISM
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12681015
Methods for Predicting Patient Response to DMARDs
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682982
Systems and Methods for Correcting for Noise and Systemic Variations in Sequencing Data
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12644092
MULTI-LEVEL MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTIVE AND PRESCRIPTIVE APPLICATIONS
5y 3m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+35.4%)
4y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 77 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month