Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/844,331

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 20, 2022
Examiner
DEGUIRE, SEAN M
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORPORATION
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
159 granted / 267 resolved
-5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
327
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 267 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the materials shown below in the reply filed on 08/19/2025 is acknowledged with claim 16 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. A search of the prior art did not show the elected species. As no claims where specifically drawn to Applicants’ elected species in independent form, no claims have been indicated as allowable. Claims written in independent form which require all the limitations of the elected species along with any dependent claims which require all the limitations of the elected species would be allowable. Under MPEP 803.02, the search was expanded to find an examinable species. In the office action mailed 09/05/2025, an examinable species was identified. In the amendment of 01/14/2026, Applicant has canceled the examinable species. The compound below was identified as a new examinable species. PNG media_image1.png 194 249 media_image1.png Greyscale Consequently, claims 1-4, 7, 11-13, 17-18, and 20-22 are drawn to the examinable species and claims 8-10, 14-16, 23, and 25 are withdrawn from further consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 7, 11, 13, 17-18, and 20-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xia et al (US 2013/0341599) (Xia). In reference to claims 1-4, 7, 11, 13, 17-18, and 20-22, Xia teaches device example 15 comprising compound 9 as shown below that reads on the instant claims for use in consumer product (Xia table 4 [0021]). PNG media_image2.png 38 656 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image1.png 194 249 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 258 456 media_image3.png Greyscale For Claim 1: Compound 9 reads on a compound having a ligand of formula 1 wherein two RD are fused to form a ring, moiety A is a 6-membered carbocyclic ring system, moiety B is a 6 membered carbocyclic ring, RB is a 6-membered carbocyclic ring system, RA is hydrogen, and K3 is a direct bond and metal M is Ir and conditions i and ii true. For Claim 2: Reads on hydrogen, 6-membered carbocyclic ring system. For Claim 3: Reads on Formula IB X1 to X4 and W are each C. For Claim 4: Reads on formula IB’. For Claim 7: Reads on A33. For Claim 11: Reads on wherein p is 1, q is 2, and r is 0. For claim 13: Reads on where LB is PNG media_image4.png 196 90 media_image4.png Greyscale . For Claim 17: Reads on a device with an anode and cathode. For Claim 18: Reads on dibenzothiophene. For Claim 20: Reads on a consumer product. For Claim 21: Reads on wherein RD form a ring. For Claim 22: Reads on wherein RD form a 6 membered aromatic ring. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sean M DeGuire whose telephone number is (571)270-1027. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A. Boyd can be reached at (571) 272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean M DeGuire/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604658
A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598909
HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593562
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593378
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577268
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+30.7%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 267 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month