Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/845,671

SUPPORT CLIP-BRUSH HOLDER AND BRUSH KEEPER ASSEMBLY FOR STORING PAINT BRUSHES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 21, 2022
Examiner
ALLEN, JEFFREY R
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
John Allen Richardson
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
512 granted / 1086 resolved
-22.9% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
72 currently pending
Career history
1158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1086 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Landis (US-3317087-A). Landis discloses: 1. A paint container adapter (12), comprising: a cylindrical outer rim (17) and a continuous inner ledge (19), the continuous inner ledge protruding inwardly towards a center of the paint container adapter from the cylindrical outer rim (Fig. 3) to define a lower section of the paint container adapter and an upper section of the paint container adapter (Fig. 4), wherein the lower section of the paint container adapter is configured to fit over a periphery of an open upper end of a lower paint container that faces upwardly, and the upper section of the paint container adapter is configured to fit under a periphery of an open end of an upper paint container that is inverted to face downwardly (col. 1, lines 55-71); wherein the upper section of the paint container adapter comprises a first continuous flat surface (upper surface of 20) for an entire length and an entire circumference of the upper section (Figs. 3, 4) that is configured to abut an outer surface of the upper paint container (the structure is capable of this use based on the container), and the lower section of the paint container adapter comprises a second continuous flat surface (lower surface of 21) for an entire length and an entire circumference of the lower section (Figs. 3, 4) that is configured to abut an outer surface of the lower paint container (the structure is capable of this use based on the container); and wherein the paint container adapter, the lower paint container, and the upper paint container define an interior space configured to store a paint applicator (the structure of 20, 21 and 18 allows for this), and the paint container adapter is configured to seal the periphery of the open upper end of the lower paint container and the periphery of the open end of the upper paint container to inhibit escape of any vapor within the interior space (col. 1, ll. 55 – col. 2, ll. 34). 2. The paint container adapter of claim 1, wherein the paint container adapter comprises a circular cylindrical ring (Fig. 3). 3. The paint container adapter of claim 1, wherein the paint container adapter comprises a circular cylindrical rim and an annular inner ledge (Fig 3). 9. The paint container adapter of claim 1, wherein the paint applicator comprises a paint roller (the applicator is drawn to the use of the adapter and the adaptor is still capable of this intended use). 10. The paint container adapter of claim 1, wherein the lower section of the paint container adapter is configured to fit over a bead that extends around the periphery of the open upper end of the lower paint container, and the upper section of the paint container adapter is configured to fit under a bead that extends around the periphery of the open end of the upper paint container (col. 1, ll. 55 – col. 2, ll. 34). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/20/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regrading applicant’s argument that Landis teaches angled surfaces and not flat surfaces, it is noted that an angled surface can also be flat, The surfaces of Landis are free from protrusions and therefore they are flat. Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). In response to applicant's argument that Landis does not teach the same claimed use, a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. The structure of Landis is capable of operating in the claimed manner and therefore is configured in the same way currently claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY R ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7426. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571)270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY R ALLEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 06, 2024
Interview Requested
Nov 20, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 20, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 16, 2024
Response Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
May 16, 2025
Interview Requested
May 29, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 07, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 15, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600533
STORAGE BOX WITH DOOR LOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595956
REFRIGERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12565359
SEALING LID
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12515855
DEVICE FOR ORGANIZING ACCESS TO AT LEAST ONE COMPARTMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12509240
MULTI-DIRECTIONAL BAFFLES FOR AIRCRAFT FUEL TANKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+26.2%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1086 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month