Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/847,891

MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR WITH ADJUSTMENT AND COMPACTION SYSTEM AND ATTACHABLE OFF-ROAD KIT WITH ASSEMBLY SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 23, 2022
Examiner
SHABARA, HOSAM
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Green Innovation Indústria De Equipamentos Médicos Ltda
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
271 granted / 323 resolved
+31.9% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
343
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 323 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/09/2025 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 112a rejection of claim 5 is withdrawn. The Office Action dated 07/10/2025 clearly included the range of rejected claims, although there was a clerical error on the PTO-326 (field # 5). The current PTO-326 is correct. Specification and drawing objections are withdrawn, in light of the amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 4-5, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4-5 and 9 are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. Claim 4 recites the limitations “of which one end receives by axle a metal plate” in the eighth and nineth lines, “frontally the bearing incorporates a frontal support” in the eleventh and twelfth lines, “extends laterally a support sleeve” in line seventeen, and “a support that extends a joint piece with a recess above and projects a clamp-type terminal” in the third and forth to last lines. It is not clear what is meant by these limitations. Claim 4 recites the limitation “which coincides with” in the tenth and eleventh lines. It is not clear what “which” refers to. Claim 9 recites the limitations “being the power supply plug then connected to the wheelchair's battery plug” in lines 8-10, “at the same time as the recess of the joint piece receives the tubular profile of the support structure of the wheelchair” in lines 12-15. It is not clear what is meant by these limitations. Claims 5 is additionally rejected as a depending from independent claim 4, see above. Claims with No Prior Art No prior art rejection was found for claims 4-5 and 9. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOSAM SHABARA whose telephone number is (571)272-5495. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am-5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, VALENTIN NEACSU can be reached at (571) 272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOSAM SHABARA/Examiner, Art Unit 3611 /VALENTIN NEACSU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 09, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595054
ENGINE FOR A FLYING BODY, METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ENGINE FOR A FLYING BODY, AND FLYING BODY HAVING AT LEAST ONE ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595019
DEVICE FOR TOWING A TOWED BICYCLE WITH A TOWING BICYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589824
A TRIKE TILTING AXLE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583534
VEHICLE WITH A DIFFUSER MOUNTED THRUSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583552
ALPINE BICYCLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month