Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 31, 2026
Application No. 17/848,046

Method and System for Remote Monitoring, Care and Maintenance of Animals

Non-Final OA §102§103§Other
Filed
Jun 23, 2022
Priority
Sep 19, 2012 — provisional 61/702,856 +8 more
Examiner
ABBOTT-LEWIS, YVONNE RENEE
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Botsitter LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
698 granted / 891 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
894
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 891 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8,20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Pantazes (9510566). Pantazes (col. 6, lines 18-33), discloses a smart collar 10 to be worn by an animal comprising: an imaging device 121, 122 configured to capture a plurality of images; and a microprocessor (col. 5, lines 65-67) or satellite communication chip 102 in communication with a network and in communication with the imaging device to receive the plurality of captured images in real-time, the microprocessor configured to at least analyze the plurality of captured images, and recognize at least one of a location of an animal or object depicted in at least one of the plurality of images; wherein the collar includes GPS satellite tracking 103 and thermal and infrared imaging sensors, a speaker 104 and a microphone 105 to allow for communication with the animal; wherein the GPS system inherently determines the distance between the real time location of the animal and at least a recognized location; further the collar allows the handler to communicate with the animal via two-way audio and video features (col. 7, lines 18-25). Claim(s) 1-8, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Bianchi et al. (2015/0053144). Bianchi et al. (hereinafter Bianchi), discloses a smart collar 24 to be worn by an animal comprising: an imaging device 62 configured to capture a plurality of images; and a microprocessor 52 in communication with a network and in communication with the imaging device to receive the plurality of captured images in real-time, the microprocessor configured to at least analyze the plurality of captured images, and recognize at least one of a location of an animal or object depicted in at least one of the plurality of images; recognize a location, identify a behavior, issue a corrective action through a speaker 64 or through a shock device 68; wherein the collar includes GPS receiver 56; wherein the GPS system inherently determines the distance between the real time location of the animal and at least a recognized location; wherein the imaging system 62 includes video imaging ([0048]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pantazes in view of Kates (2006/00111146). Although Pantazes discloses a smart collar in conjunction with a microprocessor, it is not disclosed wherein the microprocessor is configured to take action in response to detecting a RFID tag. Kates teaches a dog collar in communication with a RFID tag 310 to establish the identity of the animal and load proper reinforcement training parameters to make decisions regarding corrective actions ([0181]). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate a RFID tag as taught by Kates to work with the system of Pantazes in order to ensure the identity of the animal and monitor health conditions of said animal. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9,11-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited prior art shows examples of wearable animal monitoring and training systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YVONNE ABBOTT whose telephone number is 571-272-6896. The examiner can normally be reached 7am -5:30pmEST Monday- Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YVONNE R ABBOTT-LEWIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12468310
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE MONITORING OF VEGETATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12446570
BIRD OR BAT DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION FOR WIND TURBINE RISK MITIGATION
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12419268
ANIMAL BEDDING
3y 12m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Patent 12396451
Pest Repellant System With Compliant Architecture
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2025
Patent 12396433
ANIMAL LITTER BOX INCORPORATING A CLEANING DEVICE
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month