Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/848,121

BICYCLE CONTROL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 23, 2022
Examiner
SEOL, DAVIN
Art Unit
3662
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sram LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
118 granted / 176 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 176 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-15 are pending, and claims dated 11/11/2025 are being examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/12/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/12/2026 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, claim 1 recites in lines 4-5 “at least one sensed element disposed about a bicycle wheel”. However, in lines 12-13, the second “determine…” limitation recites: “determine a second speed based on a subset of the received second data and the first speed when the sensed element is not within the proximal region of the first sensor” (Emphasis on bold). Applicant’s specification recites: Para. [0034] “More feedback magnets may be included equally spaced on the rear wheel to increase the sampling rate” Para. [0097] “the at least one sensed element includes two or more magnets attached to the bicycle” Applicant’s specification makes clear that more than one sensed element (magnet) may be used. Thus, when the claimed bicycle wheel includes multiple sensed elements as per embodiments disclosed in [0034] or [0097], it is unclear whether “the sensed element” refers to any one of the sensed elements, each of the sensed elements collectively, a particular sensed element, or some other sensed element. For examination, the Examiner is treating “the sensed element” as “the at least one sensed element”. Appropriate correction is requested. Claims 2, 4, and 6-15 are similarly rejected, because of their dependencies on rejected claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6-15 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), set forth in this Office Action and to include all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 1, the prior arts on record do not teach, describe, and/or suggest all the limitations as presented in the claim as a whole – specifically the negative limitation of “…but not between the first time point and the second time point” (in the last paragraph). The closest prior art Hasumi (US-20200207216-A1) discloses supplementation of acceleration sensor data in time periods in which the Hall sensor does not output a pulse signal ([0024], [0029], [0080]). While, Hasumi provides the acceleration data between the second time point and the third time point, Hasumi also provides the acceleration data between the first time point and the second time point. Specifically, Hasumi [0134] discloses: Until the rear wheel 26 performs at least more than one rotation (e.g., two rotations) after the electric assist bicycle 1 starts, the calculation circuit 71 does not detect a plurality of pulse signals. Therefore, the estimated speed 83 is matched to the acceleration sensor speed 81. Accordingly, during the time period in which the speed cannot be detected by the wheel rotation sensor 35, the calculation circuit 71 uses the acceleration sensor 38 to detect the speed. It would not be obvious to remove the supplementing of acceleration sensor data between the first time point and the second time point as taught in Hasumi since doing so would discard the solution of Hasumi to avoid situations in which the speed cannot be detected by the Hall sensor. In contrast, as claimed and supported by remarks filed 11/11/2025, the invention does not want to receive acceleration data until the processor identifies two wheel speed events. Claims 2, 4, and 6-15 are also potentially allowable as they are dependent on potentially allowable claim 1 and would contain all the limitations/features of claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20220219776-A1: Corbett discloses Automated Slip Detection on an Electronic Bicycle US-20200262511-A1: by the same Applicant Hahn is a related bicycle control system Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVIN SEOL whose telephone number is (571) 272-6488. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jelani Smith can be reached on (571) 270-3969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVIN SEOL/Examiner, Art Unit 3662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Mar 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 14, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743908
DRIVING DATA COLLECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741667
SPATIO-TEMPORAL POSE/OBJECT DATABASE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741564
ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING TEMPERATURE OF STORAGE BATTERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743102
AIRCRAFT FLIGHT PATH NOISE REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743093
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE REMOTE TELEOPERATIONS SYSTEM WITH VIRTUAL PATH SUGGESTION CONSTRAINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 176 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month