Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/848,224

THIN-FILM TRANSISTOR STRUCTURES WITH GAS SPACER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 23, 2022
Priority
Mar 30, 2018 — divisional of 11/404,536
Examiner
YEUNG LOPEZ, FEIFEI
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK Hynix Nand Product Solutions Corp. (Dba Solidigm)
OA Round
8 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
865 granted / 1067 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
85.0%
+45.0% vs TC avg
§102
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1067 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki et al (PG Pub 2001/0038099 A1), Chang et al (PG Pub 2019/0148215 A1), Paek et al (PG Pub 2013/0256781 A1), Kato et al (PG Pub 2011/0114941 A1), and Saito (PG Pub 2012/0231589 A1). Regarding claim 5, Yamazaki in view of Chang, Paek, Kato and Saito (see previous rejection of claim 1) teaches a method of fabricating an integrated circuit, the method comprising: forming a first transistor structure and a second transistor structure, the second transistor structure spaced from a first transistor structure by a gap no greater than 100 nm, wherein the first transistor structure and the second transistor structure each include a body of semiconductor material having a channel region therein, a layer of dielectric material, and a gate electrode beneath and vertically aligned with the layer of semiconductor material, and spaced from the layer of semiconductor material by the layer of dielectric material; and depositing a layer of isolation material (190, fig. 1C of Paek, paragraph [0043]) in the gap, thereby encapsulating a gas pocket laterally between the first transistor structure and the second transistor structure, wherein at least a portion of the gas pocket is laterally spaced apart from the gate electrodes of the first transistor and the second transistor, and wherein the gas pocket is laterally spaced apart from the channel regions of the bodies of semiconductor material of the first transistor and the second transistor; and wherein the layer of isolation material is in direct contact with each of the channel region, the source region, and the drain region of each of the first transistor and the second transistor; and forming a source electrode and a drain electrode, wherein the drain electrode and the source electrode are on a side of the body of semiconductor material opposite the gate electrode. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki et al (PG Pub 2001/0038099 A1), Chang et al (PG Pub 2019/0148215 A1), Paek et al (PG Pub 2013/0256781 A1), Kato et al (PG Pub 2011/0114941 A1), and Saito (PG Pub 2012/0231589 A1) as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Kautzsch et al (PG Pub 2015/0163915 A1). Regarding claim 6, the previous combination remains as applied in claim 5. The previous combination does not teach depositing the layer of insulator material is performed at least in part by atomic layer deposition or physical vapor deposition. In the same field of endeavor, Kautzsch teaches depositing the layer of insulator material is performed at least in part by atomic layer deposition for the benefit of depositing a conformal layer in a trench even high aspect ratio (paragraph [0033]). Thus, it would have been obvious to the skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to deposit the layer of insulator material at least in part by atomic layer deposition or physical vapor deposition, for the benefit of depositing a conformal layer in a trench even with the trench having high aspect ratio. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 7-11 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art does not teach “an isolation material at least partially encapsulating a gas pocket between adjacent transistor structures in the array… and wherein the isolation material is in direct contact with each of the channel region, the source region, the drain region, the gate electrode, and the gate dielectric of each of the adjacent transistors” (claims 1 and 7). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 5 and 6 have been considered but are not persuasive because the allowable features are not in claim 5. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1882. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached on 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 22 earlier events
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635292
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND PRODUCT INCLUDING SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635322
OPTOELECTRONIC SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENT AND PRODUCTION METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628378
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628536
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND NEAR-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628481
DIODE ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-2.9%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1067 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month