Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 17/859,254

Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Examiner
ANDERSON, SCOTT C
Art Unit
3694
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
E2INTERACTIVE, INC.
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
619 granted / 1056 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1109
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§103
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1056 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in reply to correspondence filed 28 October 2025 in regard to application no. 17/859,254. Claims 1-19 are pending, of which claims 1-15 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claims 16-19 are considered below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: in the phrase “determining any promotional offers or plan eligibility associated with the product or service and similar products or that are functionally equivalent”, the emphasized “or” appears to be superfluous and should be removed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because they are directed to software per se. Claim 16 is directed to a "software application" and its instructions, and nothing more. That the application resides "on a mobile device" is merely descriptive of the location of the software; the mobile device is not positively claimed. Software per se is a list of instructions which is neither a process, machine, composition of matter nor a manufacture. To remedy this the Examiner suggests redrafting the preamble of the claim in "Beauregard form", such as "a non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions which, when executed by a processor, perform a process comprising". Conclusion There is no rejection made herein under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or 103, and this has been discussed previously. In regard to the “judicial exception” rejection under § 101 made previously, the combination of the web-scraping and the other previously-claimed elements presents a particular, rather than general, link between the technology and the abstraction, referring to MPEP § 2106.05(e), and so that rejection is withdrawn. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT C ANDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7442. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 to 5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bennett Sigmond can be reached at (303) 297-4411. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT C ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3694
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 29, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Sep 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770002
NEGOTIATION METHOD INCLUDING SELECTION OF NEURAL NETWORK AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762376
Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Personal Task Generator to Complete Objectives
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749096
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZED MINTING, AUTHENTICATION, AND UTILIZATION OF ASSETS
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749128
TECHNIQUES FOR AN AUTOMATED FUNDING PARTICIPATION BLOCKCHAIN SERVER
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749119
METHOD OF PROVIDING INFORMATION AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE PERFORMING THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+31.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1056 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month