Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/859,994

METHOD OF MANUFACTURING HEADERLESS PRODUCE BAGS WITH INCREASED ADHESION

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Priority
Oct 01, 2015 — divisional of 10/513,078 +1 more
Examiner
BUI, LUAN KIM
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
New York Packaging Ii
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1019 granted / 1477 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1499
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.0%
+29.0% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1477 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 22-23 and 25 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 of U.S. Patent No. 11,440,267. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because structural limitations in the claims of the instant patent application are fully disclosed and claimed by the patents. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 01/22/2025 have been fully considered and persuasive. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUAN K BUI whose telephone number is (571)272-4552. The examiner can normally be reached Generally M-F, 7-4. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gregory Pickett can be reached on 571-272-4560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUAN K BUI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Sep 18, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 19, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 22, 2024
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Jan 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Feb 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637279
System and method for preserving food during storage and transportation
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630352
Scented Pill Organizer System and Method
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629227
CARRIER ELEMENT FOR SUPPORTING AT LEAST ONE MEDICAL OR DENTAL INSTRUMENT IN A CLEANING OR CARE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630344
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ATTACHING AN EXCHANGEABLE SEALING CAPS TO CONTAINERS
1y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624801
HYDROGEN CARTRIDGE AND GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.3%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month