Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/860,710

GUIDEWIRE CORE HAVING NON-ROUND CROSS-SECTIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 08, 2022
Examiner
DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Abbott Laboratories
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
715 granted / 953 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1008
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/24/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, 9-12, and 23-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20240082550 A1 to Mawatari et al. (hereinafter, Mawatari). The dimensions of FIG. 3 of Mawatari, as set forth in paragraph [0038], are shown below in annotated FIG. 3. Regions 13A1 and 14A1 are described as being “flat plates” (e.g., “non-round cross-section”) with the remaining sections being round (e.g., “round cross-section”) as described in paragraphs [0019]-[0021]. PNG media_image1.png 378 519 media_image1.png Greyscale Paragraph [0058] discloses that FIG. 3 contemplates 2 sets of 13A/14A and 13B/14B are provided, and also contemplates that three or more sets may be provided, meaning, additional alternating flattened to round sections are contemplated and would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, since adding additional sets is explicitly contemplated and would have been a routine design choice. For purposes of this rejection, the Examiner is interpreting the guidewire to include four total sets (three “or more” sets may be provided, paragraph [0058]), a first two sets as part of a distal segment and a second two sets as part of a proximal segment (the proximal segment being interpreted to also include tapered portion 15), meaning each of the distal and proximal segments each have a plurality of flattened and round sections. Regarding Claims 1 and 9, Mawatari discloses a guidewire, comprising inter alia: an elongated core member having a proximal segment (second two proximal sets) and a distal segment (first two distal sets), the distal segment having a round cross-section segment (each of the first and second sets each have at least two flattened and round cross-section segments); the proximal segment having a plurality of round cross-section segments alternating with a plurality of non-round cross-section segments (each of the first and second sets each have at least two flattened and round cross-section segments that alternate with respect to each other) with recessed surfaces relative to the round cross-section segments (see FIG. 3, where the flattened regions have less of a thickness than respective round regions and are therefore “recessed surfaces”); (Claim 1) wherein each of the plurality of the non-round cross-section segments has a length in a range from 2.0 mm to 30.0 mm (13A and 14A are 5-10 mm); (Claim 9) where the at least one round cross-section segment in the proximal segment has a length in a range from 5.0 cm to 10 cm (tapered portion, which is part of the proximal segment, is disclosed as being 3-10 cm in paragraph [0026]) Regarding Claims 2 and 10, Mawatari discloses where the non-round cross-sectional segment is rectangle (the flattened sections have a generally rectangular shape, see Fig. 2). Regarding Claims 4, 11 and 12, Mawatari discloses the guidewire of claims 1 or 9, wherein each of the plurality of the non-round cross-section segments has a length in a range from 2.0 mm to 5.0 mm (13A and 14A are 5-10 mm). Regarding Claims 23 and 25, Mawatari discloses the guidewire of claims 1 or 9, where the elongated core member is metal core wire (paragraph [0026]). Regarding Claim 24 and 26, Mawatari discloses the guidewire of claims 1 or 9, wherein a smooth transition is provided between at least one round cross-section segment and the at least one non-round cross section segment (13A2, 14A2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 15 and respective dependent claims are allowable over the prior art of record. The closest prior art of record includes US 20240082550 A1 to Mawatari who discloses the claimed invention expect for where the non-round cross-section segments are square. Mawatari discloses flattened, generally rectangular non-round cross-sections, and the modify these to be square would have destroyed Mawatari, because Mawatari contemplates a device that bends in one plane, not multiple planes that a square configuration would provide. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN PATRICK DOUGHERTY whose telephone number is (571)270-5044. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm (Pacific Time). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacqueline Cheng can be reached at (571)272-5596. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN P DOUGHERTY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jul 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678145
CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY DEVICE FOR COLLECTING MULTIPLE SAMPLES IN A SINGLE INSERTION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678599
MEDICAL GUIDEWIRES FOR TORTUOUS VESSELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672932
ANATOMICAL MEASUREMENT IN A SURGICAL SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667703
FLEXIBLE SECURE CONNECTION OF MULTIPLE GUIDEWIRES
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661484
GUIDEWIRE WITH CONDUCTIVE ELEMENT
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month