Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/860,839

Electrical Components Attached to Fabric

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 08, 2022
Examiner
TRINH, MINH N
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1286 granted / 1499 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1547
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1499 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment That the amendment to the claims filed on 8/18/25 has been fully considered and made of record. Claims 10-14, 21-35 are now pending in that claims 21-35 are nonelected and requested to be canceled or taken an appropriate action. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference characters "20, 22” and "80" have been used to designate same part for reason provided from the record. (See proper sample DWG. below). PNG media_image1.png 188 451 media_image1.png Greyscale The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the subject matter as presented in claims 11-14 (as amended) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. (Sample of method diagram Fig. below) rather than intermediate product entities of Figs, 29-33. PNG media_image2.png 449 348 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. This rejection is set forth from previous Action under 112 rejections dated 6/12/25. Newly amended claims 11-14 still raise issues of 112 The phrase:” wherein the electrical component has a protective structure,” (claim 11, line 2) is improper method claim formats, since it directed to structure of the component. Also, it is unclear as to how forming the trench can be practiced in the protective structure of the electrical component, since no forming of the component prior to this step. Similar to claim 11 applied to claim 12 it is not known as to how “applying heat to close the opening in the thermoplastic material and enclosing the conductive strand within the trench” (see claim 12, lines 2-4), since no process of forming an opening in the in the thermoplastic material prior to this step. Claim 13 does not further limit the base claim 10, since it is a redundant of line 7 of claim 1. Also, it is suggested claim 13 should be rewritten prior to line 7 of claim 10 for clarity of method claim formats. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/18/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. because the prior art discloses the invention of claims 10-14 of the instant application for same reason provided from record. The Drawings: Applicant(s) contents that “strands 80 refers to strands in general, whereas warp strands 20 and weft strands 22 are specific types of strands 80. This is explained in para. 0061 of applicant's specification” (see under “Remarks” ¶ [0002]). This has been carefully evaluated and not found to be persuasive, therefore the previous drawing objection is retained for reason of record. A new separate Fig. where 80 may include 20 and 22 is suggested. Further, Applicant(s) also contents that “FIGS. 29-33. In FIG. 30, thermoplastic material 148 is deposited in trenches 134. In FIG. 32, strands 80 are placed within openings 150, which are in turn located in trenches 134. In FIG. 33, heat is applied to melt reflow solder 142 and melt thermoplastic material 148” (see under the “Remarks”, page 2, ¶ [0007]) this has been carefully noted and found to be persuasive therefore the drawing objection to under 37 CFR 1.83(a) has been removed and in view of new drawing objection to (see above). The 112: Applicant(s) contents that “the structure elements in the preamble are not intended to be claimed as method steps in claim 10” (see under the “Remarks” page 3, ¶ [0003] this has been reconsidered and not found to be convinced, since the method clearly directed to “a method for attaching an electrical component to fabric . . . .”(see preamble lines 1-4). Therefore, for the” depositing solder, inserting thermoplastic material, “ into the trench of the electrical component, at first “the component and the fabric” configurations in the preamble must be provided prior to step of “depositing”. (see further 112 applied to amended claims 11-14 above). The Prior Art: Applicant(s) argument regarding the prior art (see under “Remarks” page 4, ¶ [0005] – page 5, ¶¶ [0001-0002] has been carefully considered and found to be persuasive thus, the previous rejection has been withdrawn. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MINH N TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-4569. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH ~5:00-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MINH N TRINH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729 mt
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 07, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 07, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 18, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604397
A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A FORMED FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603395
BATTERY MODULE ASSEMBLY APPARATUS USING VISION AND ASSEMBLY METHOD USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603337
ADJUSTING METHOD OF NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION AND PRODUCING METHOD OF LITHIUM-ION SECONDARY BATTERY WITH REUSED ELECTRODE PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603627
Method for Manufacturing Vibration Element
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597832
METHOD FOR LAMINATED CORE OF ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1499 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month