Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/862,690

METHOD AND APPARATUS TO DISPENSE FLUID ONTO A TARGET AREA OF A SURFACE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 12, 2022
Examiner
LIEUWEN, CODY J
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
UUSI, LLC
OA Round
4 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
313 granted / 526 resolved
-10.5% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+47.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
584
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 526 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 2-26 remain pending in the application. Claim 1 was previously canceled. Applicant's amendments have overcome the objection to the Specification and each and every rejection of the Claims previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action dated 10 October 2025; however, upon further consideration new rejections are set forth as explained below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-13, 15-18, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hahn (US 2020/0114880) in view of Schmidt et al. (US 2018/0272998) and Ostergren (US 2017/0349150). Regarding claim 2, Hahn discloses a mixing valve to dispense fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (1, see par. 2), comprising: the mixing valve (4/5/8/10/11/12, see par. 33) adapted to be fluidly connected to a pressurized fluidic supply system via a fluid distribution system (par. 30; fig. 1) and disposed proximal to the target area (par. 27; fig. 1), the mixing valve including a housing (the mixing valve is housed in a vehicle; see par. 12 – “the channels and nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”; par. 23 – “arrangement in a vehicle”) with a mixing portion (5/15) having a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (7, see fig. 1), a first valve conduit (10) having a first inlet (fig. 1), a first check valve (12) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”), a first control valve (14) disposed in the housing between the first check valve and the mixing portion (fig. 1), a second valve conduit (8) having a second inlet (fig. 1), and a second check valve (11) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”); wherein the mixing portion is fluidly connected by the single outlet conduit to the outlet orifice (fig. 1), the first valve conduit is fluidly connected to the single conduit (fig. 1), the second valve conduit is fluidly connected to the single conduit (fig. 1), the first control valve is fluidly connected to the first valve conduit (fig. 1), the first check valve is disposed upstream of the first control valve (fig. 1), and the second check valve is disposed in the second valve conduit (fig. 1). Hahn does not disclose firstly, that the first inlet and the second inlet are both disposed in the housing, secondly, that the mixing valve includes a second control valve in the second conduit fluidly connected to the second valve conduit and disposed within the housing between the second check valve and the mixing portion and downstream of the second check valve, and, thirdly, a heat source disposed within the housing of the mixing portion proximal to the single conduit and the outlet orifice and downstream of the first control valve and the second control valve and in thermal communication with the fluid. Regarding the first and second deficiencies, Schmidt teaches a device (205) for dispensing fluid onto a target area of a vehicle surface (par. 7; fig. 3), comprising: a mixing valve (235) in communication with a pressurized fluidic supply system via a fluidic distribution system (fig. 3); the mixing valve including a housing (220) with a mixing portion (285/275/245) having a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (250, see fig. 2), the mixing valve including first valve conduit (270) having a first inlet (290) disposed in the housing (fig. 3) and a second valve conduit (265) having a second inlet (255) disposed in the housing (fig. 3), wherein the first valve conduit (270) includes a first control valve (par. 47 - “an adjustable flow control valve”) disposed in the housing (par. 46; figs. 2, 3 – inherent since the venturi valve 235, conduit 270, and air source 295 are all disposed in the housing), and wherein the second valve conduit (265) includes a second control valve (280) disposed in the housing (fig. 3); and the fluidic distribution system including a first fluidic conduit disposed to convey air (par. 47) and a second fluidic conduit disposed to convey a liquid (par. 48). Schmidt further teaches providing a check valve in the second valve conduit and disposed in the housing to prevent a flow of air into the second fluidic conduit (par. 48; as described this check valve would be arranged between the valve 280 and the mixing valve 235 which would place it in the housing). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the device of Hahn to arrange each of the first inlet and the second inlet in the housing, and to include a second control valve in the second conduit fluidly connected to the second valve conduit and also disposed in the housing, as all taught by Schmidt. The former modification would simply rearrange the first and second inlets nearer to the outlet orifice, which would maintain the air and cleaning fluid separate until their point of use and reduce waste. The latter modification was known to allow adjustment of the amount of flow through the second valve conduit (Schmidt, par. 48). Further, it would have been obvious to arrange the second control valve so that it is disposed within the housing between the second check valve and the mixing portion and the second check valve is upstream since this arrangement is consistent with the arrangement of the first control valve and first check valve of Hahn. Regarding the third deficiency, Ostergren teaches a windshield washing nozzle assembly (400, see par. 28) adapted to be fluidly connected to a pressurized fluidic supply system (300) via a fluid distribution system (306) and disposed proximal to the windshield (fig. 10), the nozzle assembly including a housing (402) having a conduit (406) extending to an outlet orifice (404, see par. 68), a valve conduit (422) having an inlet disposed in the housing (fig. 12), and a check valve (408/412) disposed in the housing (fig. 11), and a heat source (414) disposed within the housing proximal to the conduit and the outlet orifice (fig. 11) and in thermal communication with the fluid (par. 70). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to further comprise a heat source disposed proximal to the mixing portion and disposed in thermal communication with the fluid, as taught by Ostergren, since this was known to prevent the fluid from freezing (Ostergren, par. 67). Further, the modification of Hahn in view of Ostergren to include a heat source would further dispose the heat source downstream of the first control valve and the second control valve since Ostergren teaches arranging the heat source proximal to the single conduit leading to the outlet orifice, which would result in the heat source being disposed downstream of the first control valve and the second control valve of the mixing valve of Hahn. Regarding claim 3, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 2, and Schmidt further teaches wherein the mixing portion is configured as a T arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (par. 44; fig. 2 – axes “P1” and “P2” are arranged in the form of a T). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to configure it as a T arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit, as taught by Schmidt, since this was known to form a Venturi effect to pull in the fluid from the second valve conduit (par. 43). Regarding claim 4, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 2, and further wherein the mixing portion is configured as a Y arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (par. 33; fig. 1). Regarding claim 5, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 2, and Schmidt further teaches wherein the mixing portion is configured as a venturi arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (fig. 2). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to configure it as a venturi arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit, as taught by Schmidt, since this was known to pull in the fluid from the second valve conduit (par. 43). Regarding claim 6, Hahn discloses a mixing valve (4/5/8/10/11/12, see par. 33) for dispensing fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (1, see par. 2) comprising: a housing (the mixing valve is housed in a vehicle; see par. 12 – “the channels and nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”; par. 23 – “arrangement in a vehicle”) with a mixing portion (5/15) with a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (7, see fig. 1) disposed proximal to the target area (par. 27; fig. 1); first (10) and second valve conduits (8) having inlets (both valve conduits will be disposed in the vehicle, see par. 12 - “the channels and nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”; par. 23 – “arrangement in a vehicle”) and fluidly connected by the single conduit to the outlet orifice (5/15, see fig. 1); a first control valve (14) and a first check valve (12) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”) and in fluid communication with the first valve conduit (fig. 1), wherein the first control valve is disposed downstream of the first check valve (fig. 1); a second check valve (11) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”) in fluid communication with the second valve conduit (fig. 1); and wherein the first valve conduit receives pressurized air (par. 31), and wherein the second valve conduit receives pressurized fluid (par. 30). Hahn does not explicitly disclose that the first and second valve conduits have inlets disposed within the housing, or that the mixing valve includes a second control valve in fluid communication with the second valve conduit and disposed downstream of the second check valve, or a heat source disposed in the housing of the mixing portion proximal to the single conduit and the outlet orifice and in thermal communication with the fluid. Regarding the first and second deficiencies, Schmidt teaches a device (205) for dispensing fluid onto a target area of a vehicle surface (par. 7; fig. 3), comprising: a mixing valve (235) in communication with a pressurized fluidic supply system via a fluidic distribution system (fig. 2); the mixing valve including a housing (240) with a mixing portion (285/275/245) having a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (250, see fig. 2), the mixing valve including first valve conduit (270) having a first inlet (290) disposed in the housing (fig. 2, 3) and a second valve conduit (265) having a second inlet (255) disposed in the housing (fig. 3), wherein the first valve conduit (270) includes a first control valve (par. 47 - “an adjustable flow control valve”), and wherein the second valve conduit (265) includes a second control valve (280, see fig. 2); and the fluidic distribution system including a first fluidic conduit disposed to convey air (par. 47) and a second fluidic conduit disposed to convey a liquid (par. 48). Schmidt further teaches providing a check valve in the second valve conduit to prevent a flow of air into the second fluidic conduit (par. 48). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the device of Hahn to arrange both the first inlet and the second inlet in the housing and to include a second control valve in the second conduit fluidly connected to the second valve conduit, as all taught by Schmidt. The former modification would simply rearrange the first and second inlets nearer to the outlet orifice, which would maintain the air and cleaning fluid separate until their point of use and reduce waste. The latter modification was known to allow adjustment of the amount of flow through the second valve conduit (Schmidt, par. 48). Further, it would have been obvious to arrange the second control valve so that it is disposed within the housing between the second check valve and the mixing portion and the second check valve is upstream since this arrangement is consistent with the arrangement of the first control valve and first check valve of Hahn. Regarding the third deficiency, Ostergren teaches a windshield washing nozzle assembly (400, see par. 28) adapted to be fluidly connected to a pressurized fluidic supply system (300) via a fluid distribution system (306) and disposed proximal to the windshield (fig. 10), the nozzle assembly including a housing (402) having a conduit (406) extending to an outlet orifice (404, see par. 68), a valve conduit (422) having an inlet disposed in the housing (fig. 12), and a check valve (408/412) disposed in the housing (fig. 11), and a heat source (414) disposed within the housing proximal to the conduit and the outlet orifice (fig. 11) and in thermal communication with the fluid (par. 70). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to further comprise a heat source disposed proximal to the single conduit and the outlet orifice and disposed in thermal communication with the fluid, as taught by Ostergren, since this was known to prevent the fluid from freezing (Ostergren, par. 67). Regarding claim 7, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 6, and Schmidt further teaches wherein the mixing portion is configured as a T arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (par. 44; fig. 2 – axes “P1” and “P2” are arranged in the form of a T). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to configure it as a T arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit, as taught by Schmidt, since this was known to form a Venturi effect to pull in the fluid from the second valve conduit (par. 43). Regarding claim 8, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 6, and further wherein the mixing portion is configured as a Y arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (par. 33; fig. 1). Regarding claim 9, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the mixing valve described regarding claim 6, and Schmidt further teaches wherein the mixing portion is configured as a venturi arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit (fig. 2). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to configure it as a venturi arrangement of the first valve conduit and the second valve conduit and the single conduit, as taught by Schmidt, since this was known to pull in the fluid from the second valve conduit (par. 43). Regarding claim 10, Hahn discloses an apparatus (1) to dispense fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (see par. 2, fig. 1) comprising: a fluidic reservoir (par. 30 – “storage tank”) including a fluidic pump (17) adapted to pump fluid therefrom (par. 30); a pressure vessel (5, which is duct/tube that conveys a pressurized fluid) fluidly connected to the fluidic reservoir and adapted to receive the pumped fluid (fig. 1); a compressed air source (18) fluidly connected to the pressure vessel and adapted to provide compressed air to the pressure vessel (fig. 1); a mixing valve (4/5/8/10/11/12, see par. 33) fluidly connected to the pressure vessel (fig. 1) and disposed proximal to the target area (par. 27; fig. 1), the mixing valve including a housing (the mixing valve is housed in a vehicle; see par. 12 – “the channels and nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”; par. 23 – “arrangement in a vehicle”) having a mixing portion (5/15) with a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (7, see fig. 1), a first valve conduit (10) having a first inlet (fig. 1 – inlet to valve 12), a first check valve (12) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”), a first control valve (14) disposed in the housing between the first check valve and the mixing portion (fig. 1), a second valve conduit (8) having a second inlet (fig. 1 – inlet to valve 11) and a second check valve (11) disposed in the housing (par. 12 – “nonreturn valves can be implemented as an integrated component”); wherein the mixing portion is fluidly connected by the single conduit to the outlet orifice (fig. 1), the first valve conduit is fluidly connected to the single conduit (fig. 1), the second valve conduit is fluidly connected to the single conduit (fig. 1), the first control valve is fluidly connected to the first valve conduit (fig. 1), the second control valve is fluidly connected to the second valve conduit (fig. 1), the first check valve is disposed upstream of the first control valve (fig. 1). Hahn does not disclose firstly, that the first inlet and the second inlet are both disposed in the housing, secondly, that the mixing valve includes a second control valve disposed in the housing between the second check valve and the mixing portion and fluidly connected to the second valve conduit and disposed downstream of the second check valve, or a heat source disposed in the housing of the mixing portion proximal to the single conduit and the outlet orifice and in thermal communication with the fluid. Regarding the first and second deficiencies, Schmidt teaches a device (205) for dispensing fluid onto a target area of a vehicle surface (par. 7; fig. 3), comprising: a mixing valve (235) in communication with a pressurized fluidic supply system via a fluidic distribution system (fig. 2); the mixing valve including a housing (220) with a mixing portion (285/275/245) having a single conduit extending to an outlet orifice (250, see fig. 2), the mixing valve including first valve conduit (270) having a first inlet (290) disposed in the housing (fig. 2) and a second valve conduit (265) having a second inlet (255) disposed in the housing (fig. 2), wherein the first valve conduit (270) includes a first control valve (par. 47 - “an adjustable flow control valve”) disposed in the housing (par. 46; figs. 2, 3 – inherent since the venturi valve 235, conduit 270, and air source 295 are all disposed in the housing), and wherein the second valve conduit (265) includes a second control valve (280) disposed in the housing (fig. 3); and the fluidic distribution system including a first fluidic conduit disposed to convey air (par. 47) and a second fluidic conduit disposed to convey a liquid (par. 48). Schmidt further teaches providing a check valve in the second valve conduit to prevent a flow of air into the second fluidic conduit (par. 48). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the device of Hahn to arrange both the first inlet and the second inlet in the housing and to include a second control valve in the second conduit fluidly connected to the second valve conduit and also disposed in the housing, as all taught by Schmidt. The former modification would simply rearrange the first and second inlets nearer to the outlet orifice, which would maintain the air and cleaning fluid separate until their point of use and reduce waste. The latter modification was known to allow adjustment of the amount of flow through the second valve conduit (Schmidt, par. 48). Further, it would have been obvious to arrange the second control valve so that it is between the second check valve and the mixing portion and the second check valve is upstream since this arrangement is consistent with the arrangement of the first control valve and first check valve of Hahn. Regarding the third deficiency, Ostergren teaches a windshield washing nozzle assembly (400, see par. 28) adapted to be fluidly connected to a pressurized fluidic supply system (300) via a fluid distribution system (306) and disposed proximal to the windshield (fig. 10), the nozzle assembly including a housing (402) having a conduit (406) extending to an outlet orifice (404, see par. 68), a valve conduit (422) having an inlet disposed in the housing (fig. 12), and a check valve (408/412) disposed in the housing (fig. 11), and a heat source (414) disposed within the housing proximal to the conduit and the outlet orifice (fig. 11) and in thermal communication with the fluid (par. 70). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mixing valve of Hahn to further comprise a heat source disposed in the housing proximal to the single conduit and the outlet orifice and disposed in thermal communication with the fluid, as taught by Ostergren, since this was known to prevent the fluid from freezing (Ostergren, par. 67). Regarding claim 11, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and Ostergren further teaches wherein the fluidic reservoir is adapted to be part of a windshield washer system for the vehicle (par. 2). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the apparatus of Hahn such that the fluidic reservoir is adapted to be part of a windshield washer system for the vehicle, as taught by Ostergren, since this would enable the fluid contained therein to be used for washing a vehicle windshield in addition to the sensor. Regarding claim 12, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and further wherein the fluidic reservoir is a stand-alone device that is refilled separately from a windshield washer system for the vehicle (par. 25 – the apparatus is a sensor lens washing system). Regarding claim 13, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 12 and further wherein the fluidic reservoir includes the fluid that is at least one of a different composition and different concentration from a windshield washer fluid for the vehicle (par. 30 – the fluid is a sensor “cleaning fluid”, not windshield washer fluid). Regarding claim 15, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and further wherein the compressed air source is a stand-alone air compressor (par. 31 – “a separately associated compressed air generator”). Regarding claim 16, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and further wherein the compressed air source is a pre-charged, replaceable, pressure cylinder (par. 31 – “compressed air tank”). Regarding claim 17, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 16 and further wherein the pressure cylinder is pre-charged with air (par. 31). Regarding claim 18, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and further wherein the fluidic reservoir is part of a vehicle (par. 11), but not explicitly that the fluidic reservoir is a replaceable cylinder that contains the fluid. Nevertheless, it would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the fluidic reservoir of Hahn to be replaceable since it is well-known to make components of vehicles replaceable so that in case a component fails the vehicle owner does not need to buy a new or different vehicle. Moreover, it would have been obvious to make the fluidic reservoir a cylinder since it has been held that a change in the shape of the element involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Regarding claim 23, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10 and Bissonnette further teaches wherein the heat source heats the fluid and air and maintains the temperature until the fluid and air exits a nozzle to be sprayed onto the surface (par. 60). Claims 14 and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hahn, in view of Schmidt and Ostergren, and further in view of Krause et al. (US 2003/0234031). Regarding claim 14, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 13, but not wherein the different composition is made of different types of alcohols and the different concentration is made of different concentrations of the alcohols. Krause teaches an apparatus (fig. 1) to dispense fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (par. 2) comprising a fluidic reservoir (14) that includes fluid that is a different composition from a windshield washer fluid and is made of alcohol (par. 4). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the different composition to be made of different types of alcohols, as taught by Krause, since these were known to prevent the fluid from freezing (par. 4). Regarding claim 19, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10, but not wherein the fluidic reservoir comprises multiple cylinders with different fluids that can be used separately. Krause teaches an apparatus (fig. 1) to dispense fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (par. 2) comprising multiple fluid reservoirs (12/14) with different fluids (par. 13) that can be used separately (par. 17 – when temperature is above freezing only water is used). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the fluidic reservoir to comprises multiple reservoirs with different fluids that can be used separately since this was known to provide a fluid that does not freeze and that is more environmentally friendly (par. 4). Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Krause still does not disclose that the reservoirs are cylinders. Nevertheless, it would have been obvious to make the fluidic reservoir a cylinder since it has been held that a change in the shape of the element involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Regarding claim 20, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10, but not wherein the fluidic reservoir comprises multiple cylinders with different fluids that can be used in combination. Krause teaches an apparatus (fig. 1) to dispense fluid onto a target area of a surface of a vehicle (par. 2) comprising multiple fluid reservoirs (12/14) with different fluids (par. 13) that can be used in combination (par. 13). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the fluidic reservoir to comprises multiple reservoirs with different fluids that can be used in combination since this was known to provide a fluid that does not freeze and that is more environmentally friendly (par. 4). Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Krause still does not disclose that the reservoirs are cylinders. Nevertheless, it would have been obvious to make the fluidic reservoir a cylinder since it has been held that a change in the shape of the element involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dailey, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Regarding claim 21, Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Krause discloses the apparatus of claim 19, but not further wherein the fluid can be selected manually by an operator of the vehicle. But, Krause does further teach wherein the fluid can be selected automatically by a control (16, see par. 13). Since Krause teaches that the fluid can be automatically selected, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Hahn, in view of Schmidt, Bissonnette, and Krause so that an operator can manually select the fluid. Such a modification would allow the user to control the type of fluid for cleaning the target surface according to his or her own preference instead of being subject to use the fluid that the controller considers to be best. Regarding claim 22, Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Krause discloses the apparatus of claim 19, and Krause further teaches wherein the fluid can be selected automatically by a control (16, see par. 13). Claims 24-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hahn, in view of Schmidt and Ostergren, and further in view of Wachob et al. (US 8,474,123). Regarding claim 24, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren discloses the apparatus of claim 10, but not further including heated hoses that the fluid and air travel in. Wachob teaches a heated fluid hose (1, see col. 4, ln. 18-21). It would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the apparatus of Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren to further include heated hoses that the fluid and air travel in of Wachob since this would further heat the fluid and air and prevent the temperature of the fluid and air from decreasing in the first and second valve conduits. Regarding claim 25, Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Wachob discloses the apparatus of claim 24, and further wherein at least a portion of the hoses has an electrically conductive element (2) wound therearound (col. 4, ln. 18-21). Regarding claim 26, Hahn in view of Schmidt, Ostergren, and Wachob discloses the apparatus of claim 25, and further wherein the electrically conductive element is energized and thermal energy is transferred to the heated hoses and in turn the heated hoses transfer thermal energy to the fluid and air contained therein. This claim is directed to the manner in which the heated hose is used and does not distinguish over the heated hose of Wachob since it is capable of operating in the same manner. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the interpretation of the prior art being used in the current rejection. Therefore, Hahn in view of Schmidt and Ostergren is interpreted to render obvious each and every limitation of amended claims 1, 6, and 10, as explained in the new rejections above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CODY J LIEUWEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4477. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8-5, Friday varies. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571) 270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CODY J LIEUWEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 26, 2025
Interview Requested
Apr 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 28, 2025
Response Filed
May 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 13, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 16, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 09, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583632
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE FLUID DISTRIBUTION USING A HOVERING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569865
ELECTROSTATIC SPRAY NOZZLE INCLUDING INDUCTION RING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551908
ELECTROSTATIC NOZZLE AND CONTROLLABLE JET MINIMAL QUANTITY LUBRICATION GRINDING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12508456
CONSTANT FLOW RATE REGULATING VALVE ASSEMBLY FOR AN AERIAL FIREFIGHTING BUCKET
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12508611
CONNECTOR SYSTEM FOR HAND-HELD SPRAY GUNS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 526 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month