Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/870,221

COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 21, 2022
Examiner
ADHAMI, MOHAMMAD SAJID
Art Unit
2471
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
490 granted / 677 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
715
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s RCE filed 1/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 12 and 15 are amended. Claims 1-20 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/16/2026 has been entered. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “second communication to a third” in line 4 should be “second communication device to a third”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: “wherein the a first” in line 6 should be “wherein the first”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 10-14 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Di Girolamo (US 20230014303). Re claim 10: Di Girolamo discloses sending, by a second communication device to a first communication device, first assistance information, wherein the first assistance information is reference information or assistance information for determining a sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration, and the SL DRX configuration is used for an SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device (Fig.19 ref. 203 is a second communication device and ref. 201 is a first communication device and Fig. 19 ref. 283 and Para.[0259] At step 283, peer UE configures the SL DRX for UE 201 and); and wherein the a first communication device is configured to connect the second communication device to a communication service (Fig.5 ref. 201 UE1 is a first communication device, ref.203 UE3 is a second communication device, and ref. 205 gNB is a third communication device); and receiving, by the second communication device, the SL DRX configuration from the first communication device (Fig. 19 ref. 284 and Para.[0260] At step 284, UE 201 may accept to SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration. For the latter two options, UE 201 may provide a cause value to UE 203 as to the reason for the modification or rejection. In the case of modification, UE 201 may also provide the SL DRX configuration chosen by UE 201). Re claim 10 – SECOND GROUNDS OF REJECTION: Di Girolamo discloses sending, by a second communication device to a first communication device, first assistance information, wherein the first assistance information is reference information or assistance information for determining a sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration, and the SL DRX configuration is used for an SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device (Fig. 18 ref. 271 UE Assistance Information and Para.[0238] At step 271, UE 201 may send information to the controlling/scheduling entity 207 to help the controlling/scheduling entity in configuring the SL DRX); and wherein the a first communication device is configured to connect the second communication device to a communication service (Fig.5 ref. 201 UE1 is a first communication device, ref.203 UE3 is a second communication device, and ref. 205 gNB is a third communication device); and receiving, by the second communication device, the SL DRX configuration from the first communication device (Fig. 18 ref. 273 and Para.[0242] At step 273, Controlling/scheduling entity 207 configures the SL DRX for UE 201). Re claim 11: Di Girolamo does discloses wherein: the SL connection is a first SL connection and the first assistance information includes at least one of the following information: service information of one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or resource configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or Uu DRX configuration of the second communication device; or a reference SL DRX configuration of the first SL connection or a reference SL DRX configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection; or energy saving requirement information of the second communication device; or the reference SL DRX configuration (Para.[0259] At step 283, peer UE configures the SL DRX for UE 201. This may be through a new RRC message, or carried as a new IE in an existing RRC message, or carried in a SLRB (re)configuration). Re claim 12: Di Girolamo discloses receiving, by a first communication device, a sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration from a third communication device, wherein the SL DRX configuration is used for an SL connection between the first communication device and a second communication device (Fig. 17 ref. 253 and ref. 255 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201 and Para.[0228] Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration); and sending, by the first communication device, the SL DRX configuration to the second communication device (Fig.17 ref. 256 and Para.[0230] At step 256, UE 201 sends a message to UE 203 to inform UE 203 that UE 201 will be using DRX, and providing the SL DRX configuration); and receiving, where the SL connection is a first SL connection, from the second communication device information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration (Fig.17 ref. 258 SL Source DRX Configuration Response and Para.[0231] At step 258, UE 203 sends a confirmation message to UE 201, confirming that it has received the SL DRX configuration). Re claim 12: SECOND GROUNDS OF REJECTION Di Girolamo discloses receiving, by a first communication device, a sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration from a third communication device, wherein the SL DRX configuration is used for an SL connection between the first communication device and a second communication device (Fig.18 ref. 273 SL DRX Configuration Request ref.201 is a first communication device, ref. 207 is a third communication device); and sending, by the first communication device, the SL DRX configuration to the second communication device (Fig.18 ref. 276 SL Source DRX Configuration Request and ref. 203 is a second communication device); and receiving, where the SL connection is a first SL connection, from the second communication device information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration (Fig.18 ref. 278 SL Source DRX Configuration Response). Re claim 13: Di Girolamo discloses sending, by the first communication device, fifth information to the third communication device, wherein the fifth information is used by the third communication device to determine the SL DRX configuration (Fig. 17 ref. 251 and Para.[0223] At step 251, UE 201 may send information to the serving cell to help the serving cell in configuring the SL DRX. For example, as part of UE Assistance Information. This information may include one or more of the following: 1) number of active SL communications or; 2) indication of the requested DRX parameters). Re claim 14: Di Girolamo discloses wherein: the fifth information includes at least one of the following information: service information of the SL connection; or service information of one or more SL connections other than the SL connection of the second communication device; or a resource configuration of the SL connection, that includes a determined resource configuration sent by an SL service and/or an available SL resource configuration set; or an SL DRX configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the SL connection of the second communication device, wherein the SL DRX configuration of one or more SL connections includes a configured SL DRX configuration or a configurable SL DRX configuration; or a resource configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the SL connection of the second communication device; or a Uu DRX configuration of other one or more SL connections other than the SL connection of the second communication device; or energy saving requirement information of the second communication device; or a reference SL DRX configuration (Para.[0223] At step 251, UE 201 may send information to the serving cell to help the serving cell in configuring the SL DRX. For example, as part of UE Assistance Information. This information may include one or more of the following: 1) number of active SL communications or; 2) indication of the requested DRX parameters and Para.[0225] Indication of the requested DRX parameters. These parameters may be based on the SL DRX model. For example, UE 201 may provide an indication that it wants SL DRX for a certain resource pool, frequency, sidelink BWP, sidelink service or service type, cast type, or peer UE, etc. UE 201 may also provide an indication as to the amount of discontinuous reception it is requesting. UE 201 may provide specific DRX parameters (See Table 5)). Re claim 18: Di Girolamo discloses determining, by the first communication device based on first information, the SL DRX configuration, wherein the first communication device is a transmit end of the SL connection (Fig. 17 ref. 253 and ref. 255 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201 and Para.[0228] Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration). Re claim 19: Di Girolamo discloses accessing, from the first communication device, the SL DRX configuration (Fig.17 ref. Store SL DRX Configuration and ref. 255 and Para.[0228] At step 254, UE 201 confirms the SL DRX configuration to the Serving Cell. Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration. For example, this may be to coordinate this SL DRX configuration with other SL DRX configurations that are already enabled in the UE). Re claim 20: Di Girolamo discloses obtaining, by the first communication device, the SL DRX configuration from the third communication device or the second communication device (Fig. 17 ref. 253 and ref. 255 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201 and Para.[0228] Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6,8,9, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Di Girolamo (US 20230014303) in view of Wu (US 11,751,141). Re claim 1: Di Girolamo discloses receiving, by a first communication device, (Fig. 17 ref.253 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201. This may be through a new RRC message, or carried as a new IE in an existing RRC message. This message may be part of the SL radio bearer (SLRB) configuration and Fig. 19 ref. 281), wherein the first communication device is configured to connect the second communication to a third communication device configured to connect the first communication device and the second communication device to a communication service (Fig.5 ref. 201 UE1 is a first communication device, ref.203 UE3 is a second communication device, and ref. 205 gNB is a third communication device); determining, by the first communication device based on the first information or at least one candidate sidelink (SL) discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration, an SL DRX configuration, wherein the SL DRX configuration is used for an SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device, and the first communication device is a transmit end of the SL connection (Para.[0228] Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration and Fig. 19 ref. 282); and sending, by the first communication device, the SL DRX configuration to the second communication device (Fig. 17 ref. 256 and Para.[0230] At step 256, UE 201 sends a message to UE 203 to inform UE 203 that UE 201 will be using DRX, and providing the SL DRX configuration and Fig. 19 ref. 283). Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose receiving first information from a second communication device. Wu discloses receiving first information from a second communication device (Claim 1 A method of wireless communication performed by a user equipment (UE), comprising: receiving, from another UE, an indication of a first sidelink discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration and Fig.5). Di Girolamo and Wu are analogous because they both pertain to data communications. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Di Girolamo to include receiving first information from a second device as taught by Wu in order to improve multiple access technologies (Wu Col.2 lines 7-9). Re claim 2: Di Girolamo discloses receiving, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration; or accessing, from the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration (Fig. 17 ref.253 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201. This may be through a new RRC message, or carried as a new IE in an existing RRC message. This message may be part of the SL radio bearer (SLRB) configuration). Re claim 3: Di Girolamo discloses wherein the receiving, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration comprises: obtaining, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration from the third communication device or the second communication device (Fig. 17 ref.253 and Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201. This may be through a new RRC message, or carried as a new IE in an existing RRC message. This message may be part of the SL radio bearer (SLRB) configuration). Re claim 4: Di Girolamo discloses wherein the obtaining, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration from the third communication device comprises: obtaining, by the first communication device, a mapping relationship between the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration and service information (Para.[0178] The UEs may be (pre)provisioned, preconfigured, or configured through dedicated signaling, or through system information, with: [0179] mapping from the service or service type to a service index to be used in the determination of the SL DRX configuration). As shown above, Di Girolamo discloses a first communication device receiving mapping information via dedicated signaling or through system information. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose the mapping information is from the third communication device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that the mapping information is from the third communication device because the third communication device communicates using dedicated signaling or system information (Para.[0367] A UE may obtain a SL DRX configuration through one or more of the following mechanisms: the configuration may be (pre)provisioned; the configuration may be (pre)configured, the configuration may be provided through system information from a serving cell; the configuration may be provided through dedicated signaling from a serving cell). Re claim 5: Di Girolamo discloses wherein the obtaining, by the first communication device, the mapping relationship between the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration and the service information from the third communication device comprises: obtaining, by the first communication device, the mapping relationship between the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration and the service information via system information or dedicated signaling (Para.[0178] The UEs may be (pre)provisioned, preconfigured, or configured through dedicated signaling, or through system information, with: [0179] mapping from the service or service type to a service index to be used in the determination of the SL DRX configuration). As shown above, Di Girolamo discloses a first communication device receiving mapping information via dedicated signaling or through system information. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose the mapping information is from the third communication device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that the mapping information is from the third communication device because the third communication device communicates using dedicated signaling or system information (Para.[0367] A UE may obtain a SL DRX configuration through one or more of the following mechanisms: the configuration may be (pre)provisioned; the configuration may be (pre)configured, the configuration may be provided through system information from a serving cell; the configuration may be provided through dedicated signaling from a serving cell). Re claim 6: Di Girolamo discloses wherein the obtaining, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration from the third communication device comprises: obtaining, by the first communication device, the at least one candidate SL DRX configuration via system information or dedicated signaling from the third communication device (Para.[0367] A UE may obtain a SL DRX configuration through one or more of the following mechanisms: the configuration may be (pre)provisioned; the configuration may be (pre)configured, the configuration may be provided through system information from a serving cell; the configuration may be provided through dedicated signaling from a serving cell). Re claim 8: Di Girolamo discloses wherein the first communication device is in a non-connected mode (Para.[0083] On Uu interface, in RRC idle mode or RRC inactive mode the UE performs DRX operation with respect to only one peer cell (serving cell) and Para.[0121] SL_Inactive 211 or SL OFF is described as follows: Sidelink is deactivated and UE 201 does not have any activity, including discovery or communication and Para.[0126] SL_UnLinked 212 is described as follows: UE may transmit or receive only discovery related messages, and no other sidelink communication with peer UEs. In this state, UE 201 may announce or monitor for discovery messages and Para.[0134] Similarly, for the Uu interface, power savings for UE 201 in IDLE/INACTIVE mode is achieved by UE 201 not monitoring for paging messages outside of its paging occasions). Re claim 9: Di Girolamo discloses wherein: the SL connection is a first SL connection and the first information includes at least one of the following information: service information of the first SL connection; service information of a second SL connection of the second communication device, wherein the second SL connection includes at least one SL connection other than the first SL connection; or a resource configuration of the first SL connection, including a determined resource configuration sent by an SL service or an available SL resource configuration set; or a resource configuration of the second SL connection of the second communication device, wherein the second SL connection includes at least one SL connection other than the first SL connection; or an SL DRX configuration of the second SL connection of the second communication device, wherein the second SL connection includes at least one SL connection other than the first SL connection, and the SL DRX configuration of the second SL connection includes a configured SL DRX configuration or a configurable SL DRX configuration; or a reference SL DRX configuration; or a Uu DRX configuration of the second communication device, wherein the Uu DRX configuration is used for Uu interface transmission of the second communication device; or energy saving requirement information of the second communication device (Fig. 19 ref. 281 and Para.[0256] At step 281, UE 201 may send UE Assistance Information to the peer UEs for which it would like to use SL DRX and Para.[0257] For example, UE 201 may provide an indication that UE 201 wants DRX for a certain resource pool, frequency, sidelink BWP, sidelink service or service type, cast type, peer UE, etc. UE 201 may also provide an indication as to the amount of DRX UE 201 is requesting. UE 201 may provide specific DRX parameters (See Table 5)). Re claim 15: As discussed above, Du Girolamo meets all the limitations of the parent claims. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose where in the information associated with the second communication device includes at least one of the following information: service information of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or resource configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or Uu DRX configuration of the second communication device; or a reference SL DRX configuration of the first SL connection or a reference SL DRX configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection; or energy saving requirement information of the second communication device; or the reference SL DRX configuration. Wu discloses where in the information associated with the second communication device includes at least one of the following information: service information of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or resource configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection of the second communication device; or Uu DRX configuration of the second communication device; or a reference SL DRX configuration of the first SL connection or a reference SL DRX configuration of the one or more SL connections other than the first SL connection; or energy saving requirement information of the second communication device; or the reference SL DRX configuration (Claim 1 A method of wireless communication performed by a user equipment (UE), comprising: receiving, from another UE, an indication of a first sidelink discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration and Fig.5). Di Girolamo and Wu are analogous because they both pertain to data communications. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Di Girolamo to include receiving first information from a second device as taught by Wu in order to improve multiple access technologies (Wu Col.2 lines 7-9). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Di Girolamo in view of Wu as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Purkayastha (US 20230146058). Re claim 7: As discussed above, Du Girolamo in view of Wu meets all the limitations of the parent claims. Di Girolamo discloses wherein the SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device is a first SL connection of more than one SL connection between the first communication device (Para.[0089] For the SL a UE may have multiple SL interfaces to one or more peer UEs). As shown above, Di Girolamo discloses the UE having multiple SL connections. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose more than one SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device. Purkayastha discloses more than one SL connection between the first communication device and the second communication device (Para.[0076] The first UE may established multiple unicast links with the second UE and/or may establish other unicast links with other UEs). Di Girolamo and Purkayastha are analogous because they both pertain to data communications. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Di Girolamo to include multiple SL connections between a first and second UE as taught by Purkayastha in order to improve power savings (Purkayastha Para.[0051]). Claim(s) 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Di Girolamo in view of Park (US 20220159679). Re claim 16: As discussed above, Du Girolamo meets all the limitations of the parent claims. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose receiving, by the first communication device, identification information of the SL connection from the third communication device; or the SL DRX configuration includes the identification information of the SL connection. Park discloses receiving, by the first communication device, identification information of the SL connection from the third communication device; or the SL DRX configuration includes the identification information of the SL connection (Para.[0151] the BS may transmit groupcast/broadcast destination L2 IDs and SL DRX configurations of neighboring UEs in the radio resource configuration to the UE). Di Girolamo and Park are analogous because they both pertain to data communications. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Di Girolamo to include identification information of the SL connection as taught by Park in order to generate DRX configuration in consideration of service requirements (Park Para.[0029]). Re claim 17: As discussed above, Du Girolamo meets all the limitations of the parent claims. Di Girolamo does not explicitly disclose the identification information of the SL connection includes at least one of an SL connection identifier of the SL connection; an SL link identifier; an identifier of the first communication device; or an identifier of the second communication device. Park discloses the identification information of the SL connection includes at least one of an SL connection identifier of the SL connection; an SL link identifier; an identifier of the first communication device; or an identifier of the second communication device (Para.[0151] the BS may transmit groupcast/broadcast destination L2 IDs and SL DRX configurations of neighboring UEs in the radio resource configuration to the UE). Di Girolamo and Park are analogous because they both pertain to data communications. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Di Girolamo to include identification information of the SL connection as taught by Park in order to generate DRX configuration in consideration of service requirements (Park Para.[0029]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/19/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In the remarks, Applicant contends with regards to claim 10 that Di Girolamo does not disclose sending first assistance information as recited in claim 10 because Di Girolamo distinguishes between UE Assistance Information and SL DRX configuration information and thus it is beyond broadest reasonable interpretation to assert two types of data are the same. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. The claim defines “assistance information” as “reference information or assistance information for determining a SL DRX configuration. The “SL DRX Configuration Request” in figure 19 of Di Girolamo reads on assistance information because it is used as reference information for determining a SL DRX configuration. UEs ref.201 receives the “SL DRX Configuration Request” and uses that information as a reference for determining a SL DRX Configuration (Para.[0260] At step 284, UE 201 may accept to SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration. For the latter two options, UE 201 may provide a cause value to UE 203 as to the reason for the modification or rejection. In the case of modification, UE 201 may also provide the SL DRX configuration chosen by UE 201). The Examiner is not mapping the limitation “assistance information” to both “the UE Assistance Information” and the “SL DRX Configuration Request” and thus two types of data are not being interpreted as the same. Furthermore, the “assistance information” in the claim is not defined in the claim as any specific protocol version parameter that limits the interpretation to “UE Assistance Information”. As addressed above, the claim defines “assistance information” as “reference information or assistance information for determining a SL DRX configuration.” Therefore, given the broadest reasonable interpretation, Di Girolamo reads on the limitation as claimed. The Examiner recommends further defining the “assistance information” in the claim. In the remarks, Applicant contends with regards to claim 12 that Di Girolamo does not disclose sending information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration from and to the components as recited in claim 12 because the configuration response of Di Girolamo does not include information related to SL DRX configuration and is simply a confirmation a configuration request was received. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. The claim states “receiving…from the second communication device information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration.” The confirmation message sent at step 258 is “information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration” because the confirmation is “information associated” with the SL connection configuration. The claim does not define what the information is nor what the association is. Given the broadest reasonable interpretation, information confirming a SL DRX configuration has been received is “information associated with the second communication device for SL connection configuration.” The Examiner recommends further defining the information. In the remarks, Applicant contends with regards to claim 1 that the combination of Di Girolamo in view of Wu would change the principle of operation and exclude the serving cell from the SL DRX configuration. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. Di Girolamo does not limit the SL DRX configuration to being performed only by the serving cell nor does it exclude a UE receiving configuration information from a UE and having a serving cell. Di Girolamo allows the serving cell and the UE to both determine the SL DRX configuration (Para.[0227] At step 253, serving cell 205 configures the SL DRX for UE 201 and Para.[0228] Note that UE 201 may accept the SL DRX configuration, modify the SL DRX configuration, or reject the SL DRX configuration). Furthermore, Wu is not limited to communication being only between UEs (Col.4 lines 42-47 Wireless network 100 may also include relay stations. A relay station is an entity that can receive a transmission of data from an upstream station (e.g., a BS or a UE) and send a transmission of the data to a downstream station (e.g., a UE or a BS). A relay station may also be a UE that can relay transmissions for other UEs). Thus, Wu does not exclude the serving cell and Di Girolamo allows a serving cell and UE to configure SL DRX configuration. Therefore, the combination of Di Girolamo in view of Wu would result in a system where a UE is able to receive configuration information from other UEs and also include a serving cell. The Examiner further notes the claim does not define the “third communication device” as a base station. The Examiner recommends further defining what the first, second, and third communication devices are. Examiner Note regarding claim interpretation: Two rejections were provided for both claims 10 and 12 to show how the broader claim language allows for multiple reasonable interpretations. The Examiner recommends further defining what the first, second, and third communication devices are in claims 1, 10, and 12. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMAD SAJID ADHAMI whose telephone number is (571)272-8615. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy Kundu can be reached at (571) 272-8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMAD S ADHAMI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 24, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12549318
A-CSI TRANSMISSION WITH SLOT AGGREGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12549284
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPERATION OF USER EQUIPMENT AND BASE STATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12550165
ENHANCED TRANSMIT OPPORTUNITY SHARING IN MULTIPLE ACCESS POINT COORDINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12520221
SIGNALING FOR LINK AGGREGATION SETUP AND RECONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12513709
TRANSMISSION PROFILES FOR NR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.8%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month