Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/875,158

SILICON CARBIDE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 27, 2022
Examiner
RAMPERSAUD, PRIYA M
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fast Sic Semiconductor Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
199 granted / 283 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
298
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 283 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/26/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sundaresan et al. [US 2020/0388695 A1], “Sundaresan”. Regarding claim 1, Sundaresan discloses a silicon carbide semiconductor device (Fig. 6-Fig.7ff – see annotated Fig. 7ff* for clarification and easier reference numbering) , comprising: a SiC substrate (Fig. 7ff*, 701) of a first conductivity type (N+); a drift layer (702) of the first conductivity type (N) disposed on (as shown) the SiC substrate (701); an active area (AA) and a termination area (TA) formed in the drift layer (702), the active area including a plurality of transistor cells (¶[0002] teaches power semiconductor devices), and the termination area (TA) surrounding a periphery of the active area (as shown), wherein the termination area comprises a main junction region (TA-MJ) and an edge region (TA-ER) adjacent to the main junction region (as shown); an insulating layer (714) disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a polysilicon layer (715) disposed on the insulating layer (as shown), comprising a first portion (715.1) disposed over the active area (AA) and a second portion (715.2) disposed over the termination area (TA), wherein the second portion (715.2) extends from the edge region through the main junction region to the active area (as shown); an interlayer dielectric layer (717) disposed on the polysilicon layer (715); and a metal layer (721) disposed on the interlayer dielectric layer (714), comprising a first portion (721.1) disposed over the active area (AA) and a second portion (721.2) disposed over the termination area (TA); wherein at least one of the second portion (715.2) of the polysilicon layer (715) and the second portion (721.2) of the metal layer (721) is configured configurated to electrically connect to at least one of a gate electrode and a source electrode (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]); and wherein each of the transistor cells comprises: a first well region (705) of a second conductivity type (p-type), disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a source region (710) of the first conductivity type (N), disposed on the first well region (705); and a doped region (713) of the second conductivity (P), extending through the source region (710) and the first well region (705), and contacting the drift layer (702). PNG media_image1.png 471 1060 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Sundaresan disclose claim 1, Sundaresan discloses the second portion of the metal layer (Fig. 7ff*, 721.2) and the second portion of the polysilicon layer (715.2) are electrically connected to the gate electrode (715.2) (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]). Regarding claim 4, Sundaresan disclose a silicon carbide semiconductor device (Fig. 6-Fig.7ff – see annotated Fig. 7ff* above for clarification and easier reference numbering), comprising: a SiC substrate (Fig. 7ff*, 701) of a first conductivity type (N+); a drift layer (702) of the first conductivity type (N) disposed on (as shown) the SiC substrate; an active area (AA) and a termination area (TA) formed in the drift layer (702), the active area including a plurality of transistor cells (¶[0002] teaches power semiconductor devices), and the termination area surrounding a periphery of the active area (as shown), wherein the termination area comprises a main junction region (TA-MJ) and an edge region (TA-ER) adjacent to the main junction region (as shown); an insulating layer (714) disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a polysilicon layer (715) disposed on the insulating layer (as shown), comprising a first portion (715.1) disposed over the active area (AA) and a second portion (715.2) disposed over the termination area (TA), the second portion (715.2) of the polysilicon layer being configured to connect to at least one of a gate electrode and a source electrode (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]), wherein the second portion extends from the edge region through the main junction region to the active area (as shown); an interlayer dielectric layer (717) disposed on the polysilicon layer (715); and a metal layer (721) disposed on the interlayer dielectric layers (as shown), wherein each of the transistor cells comprises: a first well region (705) of a second conductivity type (p-type), disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a source region (710) of the first conductivity type (n-type), disposed on the first well region (as shown); and a doped region (713) of the second conductivity (p-type), extending through the source region and the first well region, and contacting the drift layer (as shown). Regarding claim 5, Sundaresan disclose claim 4, Sundaresan discloses the metal layer (Fig. 7ff*, 721.2) and the second portion of the polysilicon layer (715.2) are electrically connected to the gate electrode (715.2) (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]). Regarding claim 6, Sundaresan disclose a silicon carbide semiconductor device (Fig. 6-Fig.7ff – see annotated Fig. 7ff* above for clarification and easier reference numbering), comprising: a SiC substrate (Fig. 7ff*, 701) of a first conductivity type (N+); a drift layer (702) of the first conductivity type (N) disposed on (as shown) the SiC substrate (701); an active area (AA) and a termination area (TA) formed in the drift layer, the active area including a plurality of transistor cells (¶[0002] teaches power semiconductor devices), and the termination area (TA) surrounding a periphery (as shown) of the active area (AA), wherein the termination area (TA) comprises a main junction region (TA-MJ) and an edge region (TA-ER) adjacent to the main junction region (as shown); an insulating layer (714) disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a polysilicon layer (715) disposed on the insulating layer (as shown), comprising a first portion (715.1) disposed over the active area (AA) and a second portion (715.2) disposed over the termination area (TA), wherein the second portion extends from the edge region through the main junction region to the active area (as shown); an interlayer dielectric layer (717) disposed on the polysilicon layer (715); and a metal layer (721) disposed on the interlayer dielectric layer (714), comprising a first portion (721.1) disposed over the active area (AA) and a second portion (721.2) disposed over the termination area (TA), the second portion of the metal layer being configured to connect to at least one of a gate electrode and a source electrode (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]); wherein each of the transistor cells comprises: a first well region (705) of a second conductivity type (p-type), disposed on the drift layer (as shown); a source region (710) of the first conductivity type (N), disposed on the first well region (705); and a doped region (713) of the second conductivity (P), extending through the source region (710) and the first well region (705), and contacting the drift layer (702). Regarding claim 7, Sundaresan disclose claim 6, Sundaresan discloses the second portion of the metal layer (Fig. 7ff*, 721.2) and the second portion of the polysilicon layer (715.2) are electrically connected to the gate electrode (715.2) (as shown in Fig. 7ff, ¶[0022]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sundaresan et al. [US 2020/0388695 A1], “Sundaresan” as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Uchida et al. [US 2015/0349051 A1], “Uchida”. Regarding claim 2, Sundaresan disclose claim 1, Sundaresan does not explicitly disclose the second portion of the metal layer extends laterally beyond the second portion of the polysilicon layer. However, Uchida disclose a semiconductor device with a second portion of a polysilicon layer (Fig. 3A, 108g) in the termination region (100G-100S). Uchida further disclose the second portion of the metal layer (114L) extends laterally beyond the second portion of the polysilicon layer in direction towards the termination region. Uchida discloses the gate wiring can be adjusted to match the pitch of the cell (¶[0050]). Therefore it would obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to extend the metal layer beyond the polysilicon layer as taught in Uchida in the device of Sundaresan such that the second portion of the metal layer extends laterally beyond the second portion of the polysilicon layer because such a modification allows for the improve the effectively reduce the signal delay (¶[0078] of Uchida). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection required by Applicant’s amendment. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Gandhi et al. [US 2014/0167068 A1] Silicon carbide device e.g. silicon carbide MOSFET, junction-gate field-effect transistor (JFET) power device for power application. Kudou [US 2015/0108503 A1] teaches a cell region is provided with a gate insulating film disposed on the semiconductor layer and a gate electrode disposed on the gate insulating film, and a wiring region is provided with a field insulating film disposed on the semiconductor layer and a gate wire disposed on the field insulating film. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PRIYA M RAMPERSAUD whose telephone number is (571)272-3464. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Wed 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at (571)270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PRIYA M. RAMPERSAUD Examiner Art Unit 2897 /PRIYA M RAMPERSAUD/Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 09, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 23, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604735
DEVICE WITH AIRGAP STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575238
DISPLAY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550402
Nanostructure Field-Effect Transistor Device and Method of Forming
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12538712
MAGNETORESISTIVE EFFECT ELEMENT AND CRYSTALLIZATION METHOD OF FERROMAGNETIC LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12538618
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 283 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month