Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/876,612

BUSBAR BYPASS FOR BATTERY MONITORS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 29, 2022
Priority
Sep 21, 2021 — provisional 63/246,398
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1272 granted / 1457 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1472
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1457 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 09/01/2026 has been entered. Claims 1, 11-14 are currently amended. By this amendment, claims 1-16 are still pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by An US 2020/0355747 A1 Regarding claim 11: An at least discloses and shows in Fig. 7: An apparatus (battery management apparatus; see Fig. 7)comprising: a monitor circuit(110) having a first battery terminal(11a), a second battery terminal(11b), a bus bar terminal(bus var 20 has terminals, see Figs. 6-7)(S1 is connected to positive terminal of bus bar 20 if switch 123 is closed and Switch 124” is opened and S1 is connected to negative terminal of bus bar 20 if switch 123 is opened and switch 124” is closed; see [0066]-[0067]), a first selection input, a second selection input(via measurement target changing unit 120/120”)(see Figs. 4-5 and 7 and [0055],[0062], [0093] and [0094]), a first measurement output(as output at S1), and a second measurement output(as output at S2), the monitor circuit(110) configurable(see [0057]-[0061]) to(depending of selection of measurement channels S1…Sn+1): provide a first signal at the first measurement output(first measurement line 121) responsive to a state of the first selection input based on a voltage difference between the first and second battery terminals(11a and 11b)(see Fig. 6 and [0075]-[0077])as a first battery voltage; and provide a second signal(second measurement line 122) at the second measurement output responsive to a state of the second selection input based on a voltage difference between the second battery terminal and the bus bar terminal as a second battery voltage(see [0063]-[0064],[0070],[0075]-[0079],[0083],[0087])(note-when the second switch 123 is closed, on the second measurement line 122 is provided a second voltage that includes voltage of the bus bar 20 + the voltage of the battery 11; see Fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record either taken alone or in combination thereof cannot be reasonably construed as adequately teaching or suggesting the combination of elements and features arranged, disposed, or provided in the manner as claimed by the applicants, most particularly, as in claim 1, a system, comprising: a first multiplexer having first and second inputs and an output; a second multiplexer having first and second inputs and an output; a first analog-to-digital converter (ADC) having first and second inputs, the first input of the first ADC coupled to the output of the first multiplexer; a second ADC having first and second inputs, the first input of the second ADC coupled to the output of the second multiplexer; a first terminal coupled to the first input of the first multiplexer and to the second input of the second ADC; and a second terminal coupled to the second input of the first multiplexer and to the first input of the second multiplexer. Claims 2-10 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 1 and thus are also allowed for the same reasons. Claims 12-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 12, patentability exists at least in part with the claimed limitations of, “…wherein the monitor circuit includes: a first analog-to-digital converter (ADC) having first and second inputs and the first measurement output, the first input of the first ADC coupled to the first battery terminal, and the first ADC configurable to provide the first signal at the first measurement output; a second ADC having first and second inputs and an the second measurement output, the first input of the second ADC coupled to the second battery terminal, and the second ADC configurable to provide the second signal at the second measurement output; a first multiplexer having first and second inputs and an output, the first input of the first multiplexer coupled to the second battery terminal, the second input of the first multiplexer coupled to the bus bar terminal, and the output of the first multiplexer coupled to the second input of the first ADC; and a second multiplexer having first and second inputs and an output, the first input of the second multiplexer coupled to the bus bar terminal, and the output of the second multiplexer coupled to the second input of the second ADC. Claims 13-16 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 12 and thus are also allowed for the same reasons. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/01/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s representative argues that: An's switching arrangement selectively applies individual point voltages to a measurement channel. It does not provide, at first and second measurement outputs, separate signals responsive to respective first and second selection inputs and based on the two claimed voltage differences. Examiner respectfully disagrees and submits that An’s switching arrangement does provide a first…to n measurements outputs, separate signals(since switch S1 is selected once at a time because after the operation state of the first switching element 123 is controlled into a turn-on state, the processor 130 calculates the cell voltage of each of battery cells C12, . . . , C1n other than the first battery cell C11 among the plurality of battery cells C11, . . . , C1n based on the voltage applied to measurement channels S2, . . . , Sn+1 other than the first measurement channel S1 and after that in a state where the operation state of the first switching element 123 is controlled into a turn-on state, the processor 130 calculates a first voltage difference between the voltage applied to the first measurement channel S1 and the voltage applied to the second measurement channel S2 electrically connected to the negative electrode terminal of the first battery cell C11 and afterwards the processor 130 calculates a bus bar voltage by using the calculated first voltage difference and the cell voltage(see [0075]-[0077] and [0083]-[0088]). Therefore, rejection has been maintained where arguments were found less persuasive. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 10:00AM-6:30PM and OFF most of the time Friday when working IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DREW A DUNN can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 September 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746845
A METHOD FOR PREDICTING STATE-OF-POWER OF A MULTI-BATTERY ELECTRIC ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749722
BATTERY PROTECTION METHODS AND SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746833
DC-DC BOOST SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR RECHARGING HIGHER VOLTAGE BATTERY PACKS WITH LESSER RATED CHARGING STATIONS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744256
MELT BONDING PREVENTION METHOD AND BATTERY SYSTEM APPLIED WITH THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738748
CHARGE AND DISCHARGE STATE DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.0%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1457 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month