Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/877,142

CSI TRANSMISSION METHOD, METHOD FOR TRIGGERING CSI TRANSMISSION, AND RELATED DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 29, 2022
Examiner
NGUYEN, STEVEN H D
Art Unit
2414
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
757 granted / 945 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
985
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 945 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/14/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment This action is in response to the amendment filed on 7/22/20025. Claims 2, 4 canceled, claims 7-20 have been withdraw and claims 1, 3, 5-6, 9 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5-6 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102[a2] as being anticipated by Huang [US 2021/0136742]. As claim 1, Huang [US 2021/0136742] discloses a CSI transmission method, performed by a first device and comprising: controlling transmission of channel state information (CSI) based on a data type of the CSI [Fig 8 discloses data type of CSI is set for HARQ Feedback disable, then sidelink data set for enabling HARQ Feedback disable or Fig 8 discloses data type of CSI is set for HARQ Feedback enable, then sidelink data set for enabling HARQ Feedback enable, Par. 0357-0358, 0364], wherein the data type comprises a type that requires a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback or a type that requires no HARQ feedback [Fig 8, a HARQ feedback when data type of CSI with sidelink data being setting with feedback and No-HARQ when data type of CSI with sidelink data set with no-feedback]; wherein the data type of the CSI is determined based on a data type of first data [Fig 8, data type of CSI is based the sidelink data type which required feedback or None Feedback HARQ], wherein the first data comprises data having a highest priority other than the CSI in the sidelink data to be transmitted [Par. 0383, sidelink data has a higher priority than MAC-CE “CSI” which multiplexes together and CSI is requires no feedback]. As claim 3, Huang [US 2021/0136742] discloses the data type of the CSI is determined based on at least one of the following: [CSI is transmitted based on the requirement of Fig 8]. As claim 5, Huang [US 2021/0136742] discloses in a case that the data type of the CSI is determined based on the resource type of the first transmission resource, the data type of the CSI is the same as the data type whose transmission is supported by the first transmission resource [it is not considered because at least one of statements from claim 1 or 3]. As claim 6, Huang [US 2021/0136742] discloses in a case that the data type of the CSI is determined based on the data type of the first data, the data type of the CSI is the same as the data type of the first data [Fig 8 discloses type of data of CSI is same a type of data of sidelink data which both require feedback or no feedback]. As claim 9, Huang [US 2021/0136742] discloses the transmission requirement of the CSI is configured or predefined by a protocol [Fig 8, transmission requirement of the CSI is configured or predefined by protocol of side-link for transmitting CSI based on sidelink data such as configured data type of CSI need no feedback HARQ or feedback based on type of sidelink data need no feedback HARQ or feedback, Par. 0355, 0359]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/16/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to 9, the applicant states that Huang fails to disclose wherein the first data comprises data having a highest priority other than the CSI in the sidelink data to be transmitted. In reply, Huang clearly discloses if the sidelink data has a higher priority. The sidelink data will multiplex into first portion of a TB. MAC-CE CSI without feedback will multiplex into a second portion of the TB. TB is transmitted to other device [See Par. 0355, 0383, 0359-0373]. So, it clearly discloses the sidelink data and CSI without feedback are transmitted with each other because the first data is higher priority. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN HIEU D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3159. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edan Orgad can be reached at 571-272-7884. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN HIEU D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 29, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603799
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR URSP-BASED TUNNELING THROUGH FIXED WIRELESS ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587933
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587882
RECEPTION USING TRANSMISSION SPUR FREQUENCY LOCATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587931
CONNECTION DESTINATION SWITCHING CONTROL METHOD, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588079
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SPATIAL SETTING DETERMINATION DURING A RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+11.8%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 945 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month