Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments filed November 06, 2025, regarding the claim objections (page 6) have been fully considered and – in light of the amendment - are persuasive, therefore the related objections have been withdrawn.
Applicant’s arguments regarding the 102/ 103 rejections of the claims (pages 6-7) have been fully considered but are not persuasive for the following reasons, therefore the related rejections have been maintained:
In response to applicant's argument that the examiner's conclusion of obviousness is based upon improper hindsight reasoning, it must be recognized that any judgment on obviousness is in a sense necessarily a reconstruction based upon hindsight reasoning. But so long as it takes into account only knowledge which was within the level of ordinary skill at the time the claimed invention was made, and does not include knowledge gleaned only from the applicant's disclosure, such a reconstruction is proper. See In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d 1392, 170 USPQ 209 (CCPA 1971); MPEP 2145(X)(A). In this case the examiner has presented motivations to combine the references that would have been within the level of ordinary skill at the time the claimed invention was made in the relevant rejections of this and the previous office action. None of these motivations have been specifically addressed by the applicant’s arguments.
Further, in response to the applicant’s specific example (page 7, lines 5-6) that nothing in the prior art would motivate the pin of UXCELL riding on the ramped surfaces, the examiner notes that BOLMES teaches a pin (Handle 18 forming a pin) which rides on a ramped surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20), as detailed in the 103 rejection of claim 1 below and the 103 rejection of claim 10 of the previous office action. As BOLMES is understood to anticipate at least that feature of the claimed invention, a motivation or lack thereof to combine that feature with BOLMES is moot.
Claim Objections
Claims 16-18 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 16, and by extension claims 17 and 18, are improperly dependent on canceled claim 15 due to the amendment. For the purpose of examination claim 16 will be interpreted as dependent on claim 14, as claim 15 was previously. Appropriate correction is required.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1-2, 4, 6, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BOLMES (US-2824754-A) in view of Chen (US-6196943-B1) and Uxcell’s 3/8" Drive Sliding Wrench Breaker Bar T-Handle Socket Hand Tool (https://www.amazon.com/uxcell-8-Inch-Sliding-T-Handle-Socket.../ Hereinafter “Uxcell”) (note: the underlined portions relate to the latest amendment, for the applicant’s convenience).
Regarding Claim 1, BOLMES teaches a coupler (the apparatus of Fig. 1 described in Col. 2: Line 7 as a trailer coupling) for use with a trailer (Title, Col. 2: Line 7, and Fig. 1), the coupler configured for attachment to the trailer (Para. starting Col. 2: Line 54 teaches that Holes 34 are provided for attaching to a trailer with bolts) and for receiving and selectively locking onto a hitch ball (Ball Member 6, Fig. 2) of a towing vehicle (Para. Col. 2: Line 24 describes the invention as: quick releasable- i.e. selectively locking, and the Socket 9 being cooperable with- i.e. receiving- Ball Member 6; Para. Col. 2: Line 54 describes Ball Member 6 being clamped to a towing vehicle), the coupler comprising:
a. a coupler body (Opposite End 10, Figs. 1 & 2) configured to be attached to the trailer (Para. Col. 2: Line 24 teaches that Opposite End 10 is formed for attachment to a trailer tongue), the coupler body (10) defining an upper surface (the upper surface of Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2, hereafter: “US”);
b. a socket (Socket 9, Fig. 2) attached to the coupler body (10) adjacent the upper surface (Socket 9 being formed together with near the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2), the socket (9) configured to receive the hitch ball (Socket 9 being receiving Ball Member 6 as discussed above);
c. a clamp (Retainer Clamp 12, Fig. 2) disposed adjacent to the socket (Retainer Clamp 12 being located near Socket 9, as illustrated in Fig. 2), the clamp (12) configured to cooperate with the socket (9) for selectively locking onto the hitch ball (Para. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches Retainer Clamp 12 being pressed against Ball Member 6, pressing it into Socket 9 as illustrated in Fig. 2); and
d. a handle (Handle 18, Fig. 2) disposed above the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (as illustrated in Fig. 2), the handle (18) operatively coupled to the clamp (Handle 18 being connected to Retainer Clamp 12 through Latch Bolt 14 and Bolt Shank 15, as illustrated in Fig. 2) for selectively moving the clamp (12) between a locked position and an unlocked position (Para. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches Handle 18 raising Retainer Clamp 12 into a ball retaining-i.e. locked- position, and Para. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches Handle 18 lowering Retainer Clamp 12 into a releasing-i.e. unlocked- position), wherein the handle (18) is rotatable about an axis (an axis along the length of Bolt Shank 15 as illustrated in Fig. 2) that is substantially perpendicular to the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (Bolt Shank 15 defining the axis as discussed above and being substantially perpendicular to the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2), and wherein a rod (Bolt Shank 15, Fig. 2) connects the handle (18) to the clamp (Bolt Shank 15 connecting Handle 18 and Retaining Clamp 12 as illustrated in Fig. 12), the rod (15) defining a long axis (along the length of Bolt Shank 15 as illustrated in Fig. 2), and wherein the rod (15) rotates about its long axis during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Para. Col. 2: Line 71 teaches Bolt Shank 15 rotating in Openings 16 & 17, which are aligned with the axis of the Bolt Shank; and Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 & Col. 3: Line 17 teaches Handle 18 swinging to move between a ball retaining-i.e. locked- position, and a releasing-i.e. unlocked- position), and wherein the upper surface (US) includes an opening (Opening 17, Fig. 2) defined therethrough, and the rod extends through the opening (Opening 17 extending through the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10 and Bolt Shank 15 extending through it as illustrated in Fig. 2),
further including {a} curved ramped surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20, Fig. 2; curved as illustrated in Fig. 1) on the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (Inclined Cam Surface 20 being disposed on the Upper Surface US of Opposite Side 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2), the ramped {surface} (20) cooperating with the handle (18) to move the clamp (12) between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches that the Handle 18 rides upward along the Inclined Cam Surface 20 to raise the Retaining Clamp 12 into the ball retaining- i.e. locking- position and Paras. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches describes a similar action in the downward direction to move into a ball releasing- i.e. unlocking- position),
further wherein the handle (18) includes {a} curved {channel} (Flattened Portion 37, Fig. 2, considered a channel in that it is formed as a groove and considered curved in that it is illustrated with a curved shape in Fig. 1) and wherein the ramped {surface} (20) {is} received in the {channel} (37) when the handle (18) is rotated so as to move the clamp (12) to the locked position (Flattened Portion 37 being in contact with-i.e. receiving- Inclined Cam Surface 20 while Retaining Clamp 12 is in the locked position, as illustrated in Fig. 2) and wherein the rod (15) further includes a pin (Handle 18 forming a pin) wherein the pin (18) rides on the ramped {surface} (20) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches that the Handle 18 rides upward along the Inclined Cam Surface 20 to move into the ball retaining- i.e. locking- position and Paras. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches describes a similar action in the downward direction to move into a ball releasing- i.e. unlocking- position).
BOLMES does not teach that the curved ramped surface and the curved channel are each pairs.
Chen teaches, in another handle apparatus that converts an operator’s rotational input into linear movement (Para. Col. 3: Line 4 teaches that rotating Knob 5 causes Spur Cam-Disk 30 to drive Passive Cam-Disk 31 in an axial direction; see also Figs. 2- 3), a pair of curved ramped surfaces (formed by the surface of Cam-Disk Flanges 312 that engages with Cam-Disk Flanges 3011 as illustrated in Fig. 1; Para. Col. 2: Line 31 teaches the Cam-Disk Flanges 312 as a pair in that it teaches a plurality of Cam-Disk Flanges 3011 which are coordinately formed with them, curved in that the Cam-Disk Flanges 3011 are therein described as circular, and ramped in that they are angled with respect to their direction of motion as illustrated in Fig. 1) which cooperate with a handle (Knob 5, Fig. 1) to drive a linear movement (as discussed above), and a pair of curved channels (Cam-Disk Recesses 3012, Fig. 1; considered a pair and curved for similar reasons as the Cam-Disk Flanges 312) wherein the ramped surfaces (313) are received in the channels (3012) when the handle (5) is rotated (Para. Col. 3: Line 4 teaches that when Knob 5 is rotated Cam-Disk Flanges 312 engage with- i.e. are received by- Cam-Disk Recesses 3012).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art having the teachings of BOLMES and Chen in front of them before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify BOLMES’s coupler such that the curved ramped surface and the curved channel were each pairs as suggested by Chen. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have appreciated the advantage of providing a balancing axial force across the axis of rotation that would beneficially provide a smoother acting handle movement.
BOLMES, as modified above, does not teach an opening in the rod where the pin is inserted.
Uxcell teaches, in another handle apparatus for rotational movement (being described in the title as “T-Handle” and “Wrench”, where a wrench is understood to be for the purpose of driving a rotational movement), a rod (Rod “RD”, Fig. 1 Annotated) including an opening (Opening “OP”, Fig. 1 Annotated) perpendicular to the long axis (up and down along Rod RD- in Fig. 1 Annotated) of the rod (Opening OP being disposed perpendicular to the long axis- i.e. up and down- of Rod RD as illustrated in Fig. 1 Annotated) and further including a pin (Pin “PN”, Fig. 1 Annotated) inserted through the rod opening (Pin PN being inserted through Opening OP of Rod RD as illustrated in Fig. 1 Annotated).
PNG
media_image1.png
391
642
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Uxcell further teaches that sliding the straight bar all the way to one side of the T-Bar allows the application of more leverage and therefore more torque to a fastener (“About this item”).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art having the teachings of BOLMES, Chen, and Uxcell in front of them before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify BOLMES’s coupler, as modified above, to include an opening in the rod where a pin is inserted as suggested by Uxcell. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have appreciated the advantage of allowing the rod to slide all the way to one side that would beneficially allow the application of more torque to a fastener as taught by Uxcell and discussed above.
Regarding Claim 2, BOLMES further teaches that the socket further includes a side opening (the right side portion of Socket 9 being open as illustrated in Fig. 2) into which the clamp (12) moves for the selective locking of the hitch ball (Retainer Clamp 12 being illustrated as in the side opening and in a ball retaining position in Fig. 2) and a channel (a channel shape being formed by Opposite End 10, as illustrated in Figs. 1 & 2 and being described as u-shaped in Para. Col. 2: Line 53) adjacent the side opening (Opposite End 10 being next to the side opening as illustrated in Fig. 2), the channel (10) defining a lower opening (the opening disposed downwards in Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2), wherein the clamp (12) is movable within the channel (Para. Col. 2: Line 54 teaches Retainer Clamp 12 swinging on Pivot 11, and being disposed within Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2, is understood to be moveable within it) for the selective movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (the ball retaining and releasing positions discussed above), and further including a stop (Self Locking Nut 29, Fig. 2, considered a stop in that it prevents movement of the Retainer Clamp 12 in at least one direction) disposed in the channel adjacent the lower opening (as illustrated in Fig. 2), the stop (29) operative to prevent the clamp from moving beyond the lower opening (Self Locking Nut 29 securing Retaining Clamp 12 to Latch Bolt 14, as illustrated in Fig. 2, it prevents Retaining Clamp 12 from detaching from the Latch Bolt 14 which would cause it to move beyond the lower opening in Opposite End 10).
Regarding Claim 4, BOLMES further teaches that the rod (15) rotates relative to the clamp (12) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 & Col. 3: Line 17 teaches Handle 18 swinging to move between a ball retaining-i.e. locked- position, and a releasing-i.e. unlocked- position; Handle 18 being connected to Bolt Shank 15 such that they turn together and Retaining Clamp 12 being fixed rotationally in the axis along Bolt Shank 15 that Bolt Shank 15 is understood to rotate relative to Retaining Clamp 12 when moving between the locked and unlocked positions).
Regarding Claim 6, BOLMES further teaches that the rod (15) is coupled to the clamp (12) below the opening (17) and coupled to the handle (18) above the opening (Bolt Shank 15 passing through Opening 16 of the Retaining Clamp 12 below Opening 17 of the Opposite End 10 so as to be coupled there, and Bolt Shank 15 coupled to Handle 18 at a corner of Latch Bolt 14 which is disposed above Opening 17 of the Opposite End 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2).
Regarding Claim 11, BOLMES, as modified above such that the ramped surfaces are a pair (see the 103 rejection of claim 8 above), further teaches that at least one of the ramped surfaces includes a detent (the lower-right side of Inclined Cam Surface 20, Fig. 2) to receive and hold the pin (18) with the clamp (12) in {the unlocked position} (the lower-right side of Inclined Cam Surface 20 forming a low point in the path of Handle 18 such that, together with a downward force applied to the Handle 18 by Spring 26, it would prevent a vertical motion of Handle 18 when positioned there, it is considered a detent that would receive and hold Handle 18 while the Retaining Clamp 12 is in a unlocked position; see also the corresponding claim objection above).
Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BOLMES, Chen, and Uxcell in view of Kraai (US-7690673-B1).
Regarding Claim 12, BOLMES does not teach a pair of tabs for a padlock shaft.
Kraai teaches, in another coupler for a trailer (Coupler 10, Fig. 1 and Para. Col. 2: Line 39), a pair of tabs (Locking Surface 36 of Lever 26 and Bracket 42, Fig. 1), one (36) affixed to a handle (Lever 26, Fig. 1) and one (42) affixed to a coupler body (10), the tabs (36 & 42) each including an opening (Locking Opening 56 in Locking Surface 36 and Locking Hole 46 in Bracket 42, Fig. 1), wherein the openings (56 & 46) are aligned with one another when a clamp (Ball Clamp Member 22, Fig. 1) is in a locked position (Para. Col. 3: Line 46 teaches Locking Opening 56 and Locking Hole 46 being aligned when Lever 26 is in a locked position and Para. Col. 2: Line 63 teaches that Lever 26 acts to move Clamp 22 to a clamping- i.e. locking- position), the aligned openings (56 & 46) operative for insertion of a padlock shaft therethrough (Para. Col. 3: Line 46 teaches that a padlock may be positioned within the Locking Opening 56 and Locking Hole 46 to retain the Lever 26 in the locked position).
Kraai further teaches that a padlock may advantageously be used to secure against theft of the towed vehicle by an unauthorized decoupling (Para. Col. 3: Line 46).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art having the teachings of BOLMES and Kraai in front of them before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify BOLMES’s coupler to include a pair of tabs for a padlock shaft as suggested by Kraai. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have appreciated the advantage of providing a means for securement against theft as taught by Kraai and discussed above.
Claims 13-14 and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BOLMES in view of Chen (note: the underlined portions relate to the latest amendment, for the applicant’s convenience).
Regarding Claim 13, BOLMES, as modified above, teaches a coupler for use with a trailer that has many features which are substantially similar to the coupler of claim 1 (see the 103 rejection of claim 1 above, noting that at least the features taught by Uxcell of claim 1 are not recited in claim 13), and further teaches at least one ramped surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20, Fig. 2) extending upward from the upper surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20 being disposed on the Upper Surface US of Opposite Side 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2); and that the handle (18) includes a skid (Flattened Portion 37, Fig. 2, considered a skid in that it is formed to provide a bearing surface as described in Para. Col. 2: Line 72) that rides on the ramped surface (20) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches that the Flattened Portion 37 of Handle 18 rides upward along the Inclined Cam Surface 20 to raise the Retaining Clamp 12 into the ball retaining- i.e. locking- position and Paras. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches describes a similar action in the downward direction to move into a ball releasing- i.e. unlocking- position).
BOLMES, as modified above, does not teach that the skid is a pair of skids, but it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art having the teachings of BOLMES, Chen, and Uxcell in front of them before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify BOLMES’s coupler, as modified above, such that the skid was a pair of skids for the same reasons that the curved ramped surface and the curved channel were modified to be pairs as discussed in the 103 rejection of claim 1 above.
Regarding Claim 14, BOLMES further teaches the handle (18) is rotatable about an axis (an axis along the length of Bolt Shank 15 as illustrated in Fig. 2) that is substantially perpendicular to the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (Bolt Shank 15 defining the axis as discussed above and being substantially perpendicular to the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2).
Regarding Claim 16, BOLMES further teaches that a rod (Bolt Shank 15, Fig. 2) connects the handle (18) to the clamp (Bolt Shank 15 connecting Handle 18 and Retaining Clamp 12 as illustrated in Fig. 12), the rod (15) defining a long axis (along the length of Bolt Shank 15 as illustrated in Fig. 2), and wherein the rod (15) rotates about its long axis relative to the clamp (12) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 & Col. 3: Line 17 teaches Handle 18 swinging to move between a ball retaining-i.e. locked- position, and a releasing-i.e. unlocked- position; Handle 18 being connected to Bolt Shank 15 such that they turn together and Retaining Clamp 12 being fixed rotationally in the axis along Bolt Shank 15 that Bolt Shank 15 is understood to rotate relative to Retaining Clamp 12 when moving between the locked and unlocked positions).
Regarding Claim 17, BOLMES further teaches that the upper surface (US) includes an opening (Opening 17, Fig. 2) defined therethrough, and the rod extends through the opening (Opening 17 extending through the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10 and Bolt Shank 15 extending through it as illustrated in Fig. 2).
Regarding Claim 18, BOLMES, as modified by Chen, teaches all limitations (see the 103 rejection of claim 15 above for the teachings of Chen and the motivation to combine them with the coupler of BOLMES).
Regarding Claim 19, BOLMES teaches a trailer (any of the “trailer vehicles” cited in Col. 1: Line 15) including a coupler (Col. 2: Line 7 describes the apparatus of Fig. 1 as a trailer coupling for trailing vehicles) for receiving and selectively locking onto a hitch ball (Ball Member 6, Fig. 2) of a towing vehicle (Para. Col. 2: Line 54 describes Ball Member 6 being clamped to a towing vehicle), wherein the coupler comprises:
a. a socket (Socket 9, Fig. 2) configured to receive the hitch ball (Socket 9 being cooperable with- i.e. receiving- Ball Member 6;);
b. an upper surface (the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2) adjacent the socket (Socket 9 being formed together with near the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10 as illustrated in Fig. 2) and at least one ramped surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20) extending upward from the upper surface (Inclined Cam Surface 20 extending upward from the Upper Surface US of Opposite Side 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2);
c. a clamp (Retainer Clamp 12, Fig. 2) disposed adjacent to the socket (Retainer Clamp 12 being located near Socket 9, as illustrated in Fig. 2), the clamp (12) configured to cooperate with the socket (9) for selectively locking onto the hitch ball (Para. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches Retainer Clamp 12 being pressed against Ball Member 6, pressing it into Socket 9 as illustrated in Fig. 2); and
d. a handle (Handle 18, Fig. 2) disposed above the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (as illustrated in Fig. 2), the handle (18) operatively coupled to the clamp (Handle 18 being connected to Retainer Clamp 12 through Latch Bolt 14 and Bolt Shank 15, as illustrated in Fig. 2) for selectively moving the clamp (12) between a locked position and an unlocked position (Para. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches Handle 18 raising Retainer Clamp 12 into a ball retaining-i.e. locked- position, and Para. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches Handle 18 lowering Retainer Clamp 12 into a releasing-i.e. unlocked- position), wherein the handle (18) is rotatable about an axis (an axis along the length of Bolt Shank 15 as illustrated in Fig. 2) that is substantially perpendicular to the upper surface (US) of the coupler body (Bolt Shank 15 defining the axis as discussed above and being substantially perpendicular to the Upper Surface US of Opposite End 10, as illustrated in Fig. 2), and wherein the handle (18) includes a skid (Flattened Portion 37, Fig. 2, considered a skid in that it is formed to provide a bearing surface as described in Para. Col. 2: Line 72) that rides on the ramped surface (20) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches that the Flattened Portion 37 of Handle 18 rides upward along the Inclined Cam Surface 20 to raise the Retaining Clamp 12 into the ball retaining- i.e. locking- position and Paras. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches describes a similar action in the downward direction to move into a ball releasing- i.e. unlocking- position) and further including a pin (Handle 18 forming a pin) that rides on the ramped surfaces (20) during movement between the locked position and the unlocked position (Paras. Col. 3: Line 49 teaches that the Handle 18 rides upward along the Inclined Cam Surface 20 to move into the ball retaining- i.e. locking- position and Paras. Col. 3: Line 17 teaches describes a similar action in the downward direction to move into a ball releasing- i.e. unlocking- position).
BOLMES does not teach that the curved ramped surface and the skid are each pairs, but it would have been obvious to make them pairs in view of the teachings of Chen (see the 103 rejections of claims 1 and 13 above for the teachings of Chen and motivation to combine them with the coupler / trailer of BOLMES).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER JAY STANLEY whose telephone number is (571)272-3329. The examiner can normally be reached Monday- Friday 8:30-5:30 ET.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu, Ph.D. can be reached at (571)272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/TYLER JAY STANLEY/Examiner, Art Unit 3611 /VALENTIN NEACSU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3611