Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/882,746

LINKS FOR WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 08, 2022
Examiner
MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA
Art Unit
2174
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
7-8
OA Rounds
5y 7m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allow Rate
76 granted / 249 resolved
-24.5% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
284
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
65.8%
+25.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 249 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This communication is responsive to RCE/Amendment filed 01/12/2026. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. In the Amendment, claims 1, 14, 16 and 20 are amended. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/16/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued Sun is silent regarding the relational entry including a pointer. The Examiner respectfully disagrees in response to applicant's arguments against the references individually, one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Hshieh teaches the relational entry (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331). Sun teaches the last viewed content which inherently is a stored point to the location of the content for later access (Sun, para.79, 86, 96). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murphy et al. (“Murphy”, US 2015/0205489) in view of Mattox, JR et al. (“Mattox”, US 2021/0081486) in view of Hshieh et al. (“Hshieh”, US 2020/0379616) and further in view of Sun et al. (“Sun”, US 2015/0160788). As per claim 1, Murphy teaches a computer-implemented method, comprising: launching, by one or more processors of a computing device, a web-based application in a browser instance presented on a display device (Murphy, Figs.1-2, para.25, browser application 1102 displayed in web browser); receiving, by the one or more processors, information for presentation in the browser instance, the information including a plurality of content items, wherein a particular content item of the plurality of content items is indicated as being a selected content item (Murphy, Figs.1-2, plurality of content items 1108 with first content item selected; para.25, 28); generating, by the one or more processors, a system window for presentation in the browser instance along with the plurality of content items to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar); and when a response to the system window indicates that the user wants to create the graphical indicia, the one or more processors creating the graphical indicia for the selected content item (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar). However, Murphy does not explicitly teach generating a system notification including a query asking whether a user associated with the computing device wants to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item. Mattox teaches a method of icon creation that generates a system notification including a query asking whether a user associated with the computing device wants to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item (Mattox, para.34, 37-39, Fig.2, 5, recommendation notification 210/508). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Mattox’s teaching with Murphy’s method to recommend frequently used apps to reduce access time. Furthermore, the method of Murphy and Mattox does not explicitly teach creating a relational entry associating the graphical indicia with a direct link to the selected content item. Hshieh teaches a method of creating links by creating a relational entry associating the graphical indicia with a direct link to the content item (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331 create entries storing links). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Hshieh’s teaching with the method of Murphy and Mattox to provide details linking the indicia to the target location. Although, the method of Murphy, Mattox and Hsieh teaches amount of time spent on items stored in a relational entry (Hshieh, para.146, usage tables 331), the method does not teach to include a pointer to a last viewing spot of the selected content item. Sun teaches a method of displaying icons which includes a pointer to a last viewing spot of the selected content item (Sun, Fig.4c, para.79, 86, 96, icon 436, 442, 444 represent last content). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Sun’s teaching with the method of Murphy, Mattox and Hshieh to provide additional context information associated with the icon. As per claim 2, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising presenting the graphical indicia in a selected region of a graphical user interface for display on the display device (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar). As per claim 3, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 2, wherein the selected region of the graphical user interface is separate from the browser instance (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar). As per claim 4, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the relational entry includes a name of the selected content item, information identifying the graphical indicia, and a uniform resource locator that identifies the direct link to the selected content item in the web-based application (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331). As per claim 5, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the relational entry is part of a relational file that includes information about the web-based application (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331). As per claim 6, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, wherein creating the graphical indicia for the selected content item further includes creating a badge, the badge including a graphical identifier associated with the web-based application (Sun, para.69, Fig.4a, badge 422; Mattox, Fig.3, element 306, para.35-36, 47). As per claim 7, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 6, wherein the graphical identifier has a same appearance as the graphical indicia (Mattox, Fig.3, element 306, para.35-36, 47). As per claim 8, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 6, wherein the badge intersects or adjoins the graphical indicia (Sun, para.69, Fig.4a, badge 422). As per claim 9, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the web-based application is a progressive web application (Mattox, para.35-36, 62, 64, 69, shortcuts to progressive web applications). As per claim 10, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 9, wherein the progressive web application is a first progressive web application and the selected content item is a second progressive web application (Mattox, para.35-36, 62, 64, 69, Fig.4, apps 406). As per claim 11, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 9, wherein the selected content item is one of a plurality of enterprise applications hosted by the progressive web application (Mattox, para.35-36, 62, 64, 69). As per claim 12, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying that the graphical indicia for the selected content item has been selected (Murphy, Figs.1-2, plurality of content items 1108 with first content item selected; para.25, 28); obtaining the direct link to the selected content item from the relational entry (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331); and automatically launching a direct browser instance using the direct link to the selected content item (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331 include links to content). As per claim 13, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: identifying that the graphical indicia for the selected content item has been selected (Murphy, Figs.1-2, plurality of content items 1108 with first content item selected; para.25, 28); obtaining the direct link to the selected content item from the relational entry (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331); and accessing the direct link to install media content of the selected content item on the computing device (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331 include links to content). As per claim 14, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising identifying that the graphical indicia for the selected content item has been selected (Murphy, Figs.1-2, plurality of content items 1108 with first content item selected; para.25, 28); obtaining the direct link to the selected content item (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331 include links to content) and the pointer to the last viewing spot of the selected content item from the relational entry (Sun, para.79, 86, 96, stored point to the location of the content for later access); and automatically launching media content of the selected content item on the computing device starting at the last viewing spot (Sun, Fig.4c, para.79, 86, 96, icon 436, 442, 444 represent last content). As per claim 15, the method of Murphy, Mattox, Hshieh and Sun teach the method of claim 14, further comprising updating the pointer of the relational entry upon exiting the media content (Sun, Fig.4c, para.79, 86, 96). As per claim 16, Murphy teaches a computing system comprising: memory configured to store a relational file (Murphy, para.46, 56, Fig.9, memory 904); a display module having a display engine configured to generate a graphical user interface (Murphy, para.55, 70, Fig.9, display 916); and one or more processors operatively coupled to the memory the display module (Murphy, para.61, Fig.9, processor 952), the one or more processors being configured to: launch a web-based application in a browser instance presented by the display module on a display device (Murphy, Figs.1-2, para.25, browser application 1102 displayed in web browser); receive information for presentation in the browser instance, the information including a plurality of content items, wherein a particular content item of the plurality of content items is indicated as being a selected content item (Murphy, Figs.1-2, plurality of content items 1108 with first content item selected; para.25, 28); generate a system window for presentation in the browser instance along with the plurality of content items to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar); and when a response to system window indicates that the graphical indicia should be created (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar): create the graphical indicia for the selected content item (Murphy, Fig.2, system window 2204; para.28, 33-34, shortcut generated and displayed on desktop/start menu/launch bar). However, Murphy does not explicitly teach generating a system notification including a query asking whether a user associated with the computing device wants to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item and present an indicator on the selected content item, which indicates to the user that the selected content item has been updated or changed. Mattox teaches a system of icon creation that generates a system notification including a query asking whether a user associated with the computing device wants to create a graphical indicia for the selected content item (Mattox, para.34, 37-39, Fig.2, 5, recommendation notification 210/508). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Mattox’s teaching with Murphy’s system to recommend frequently used apps to reduce access time. Furthermore, the system of Murphy and Mattox does not explicitly teach to create a relational entry associating the graphical indicia with a direct link to the selected content item; and store the created relational entry in the relational file. Hshieh teaches a system of creating links by creating a relational entry associating the graphical indicia with a direct link to the content item and storing the created relational entry in a relational file (Hshieh, para.146-147, usage tables 331 create entries storing links). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Hshieh’s teaching with the system of Murphy and Mattox to provide details linking the indicia to the target location. Although, the system of Murphy, Mattox and Hsieh teaches amount of time spent on items stored in a relational entry (Hshieh, para.146, usage tables 331), the system does not teach to include a pointer to a last viewing spot of the selected content item. Sun teaches a system of displaying icons which includes a pointer to a last viewing spot of the selected content item (Sun, Fig.4c, para.79, 86, 96, icon 436, 442, 444 represent last content). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Sun’s teaching with the system of Murphy, Mattox and Hshieh to provide additional context information associated with the icon. Claim 17 is similar to claim 6, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claims 18-19 are similar to claims 12-13, and are therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 20 is similar to claim 14, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAJEDA MUHEBBULLAH whose telephone number is (571)272-4065. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tue/Thur-Fri 10am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William L Bashore can be reached on 571-272-4088. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.M./ Sajeda MuhebbullahExaminer, Art Unit 2174 /WILLIAM L BASHORE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2174
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 02, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 29, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 29, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 06, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
May 29, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 11, 2024
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 11, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 23, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 27, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 03, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 30, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 28, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 27, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 27, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 09, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12510876
MACHINE STATE VISUALIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12271745
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECONCILING USER INTERACTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 08, 2025
Patent 12260841
MULTIPLE PRIMARY USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 25, 2025
Patent 12248673
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATTRIBUTING A SCROLL EVENT IN AN INFINITE SCROLL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Patent 12001661
Bound Based Contextual Zoom
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 04, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+34.7%)
5y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 249 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month