Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/887,227

METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHANNEL RECEPTION OCCASION AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 12, 2022
Examiner
LIU, SIMING
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
462 granted / 563 resolved
+24.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
582
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 7 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 and 17 recite a mathematic expression. It doesn’t recite how the mathematic expression is utilized in a determining a channel reception occasion method. Further clarification is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 10-16, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huang et al (US 2021/0168762 A1). Regarding claim 1, 11, Huang teaches a method/aparatus for determining a channel reception occasion, wherein the method comprises: determining a first time domain resource offset value set, wherein the first time domain resource offset value set comprises a plurality of slot offset values between a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) and a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) ([0540], “the first UE transmits the sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook in a slot “nu”. In some examples, the slot “nu” comprises one or more uplink resources. In some examples, the first UE is configured with a set of time offsets (e.g., a set of one or more time offsets comprising one or more k1′ values). In some examples, each time offset (e.g., k1′) of the set of time offsets corresponds to a number of physical slots from a PSFCH slot “nf” to an uplink slot “nu”. In some examples, the first UE derives an association set based upon the set of time offsets. In some examples, the association set may be denoted as “nu -k1′”, wherein k1′ values comprise time offset values in the set of time offsets (e.g., the k1′ values comprise all time offset values configured in the set of time offsets). In an example where the set of time offsets comprise a k1′ value of 3 and a k1′ value of 4, the association set may comprise slots “nu -3” and “nu -4”. In some examples, the association set is associated with the uplink slot “nu”. For example, one or more sidelink HARQ-ACKs received in one or more slots in the association set may be transmitted (by the first UE) in the same uplink slot “n””, and [0538], “Each k1’ value of the set of K1’ value may denote a time offset corresponding to a number of physical slots from a PSFCH slot “nf” to an uplink slot “nu” (e.g., a PUCCH slot)”); and determining at least one PSFCH reception occasion based on the first time domain resource offset value set and a feedback period of the PSFCH ([0542], “The first number of occasions may be (and/or may be determined and/or derived based upon) a number of slots (e.g., a number of possible slots) comprising one or more PSCCH resources and/or one or more PSSCH resources associated with a slot “nf”, comprising one or more PSFCH resources, which is in an association set (e.g., the association set may correspond to a set of one or more slots “nu -k1′”, and also see [0545], “each set of N (e.g., the periodicity) occasions of the one or more first occasions may be a “PSFCH occasion” (e.g., every Nth occasion of the one or more first occasions may be an “PSFCH occasion”). For example, in a scenario in which the one or more first occasions comprise occasions 1, 2, 3 and 4, and in which N=2, PSFCH occasions of the one or more first occasions may comprise occasions 2 and 4, or PSFCH occasions of the one or more first occasions may comprise occasions 1 and 3”, it’s noted that N is the feedback period of the PSFCH). Regarding claim 2, 12, Huang further teaches that the determining at least one PSFCH reception occasion based on the first time domain resource offset value set and a feedback period of the PSFCH comprises: determining, at least one time domain resource as a time domain resource in the at least one PSFCH reception occasion, wherein the at least one time domain resource is in a time domain resource set corresponding to the first time domain resource offset value set ([0542]), and satisfies the feedback period of the PSFCH, and is for sidelink transmission ([0545]). Regarding claim 3, 13, Huang further teaches that the method further comprises: generating a hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) codebook based on the at least one PSFCH reception occasion, wherein a size of the HARQ-ACK codebook is related to a quantity of the at least one PSFCH reception occasion ([0539], “a first UE transmits a sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook to a network, wherein a size of the sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook is determined (and/or derived) based upon a first number of occasions. In some examples, the size of the sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook is equal to the first number of occasions”). Regarding claim 4, 14, Huang further teaches that the time domain resource set corresponding to the first time domain resource offset value set is a set obtained by subtracting each slot offset value in the first time domain resource offset value set from a PUCCH slot n ([0540], “the first UE transmits the sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook in a slot “nu”. In some examples, the slot “nu” comprises one or more uplink resources. In some examples, the first UE is configured with a set of time offsets (e.g., a set of one or more time offsets comprising one or more k1′ values). In some examples, each time offset (e.g., k1′) of the set of time offsets corresponds to a number of physical slots from a PSFCH slot “nf” to an uplink slot “nu”. In some examples, the first UE derives an association set based upon the set of time offsets. In some examples, the association set may be denoted as “nu -k1′”, wherein k1′ values comprise time offset values in the set of time offsets (e.g., the k1′ values comprise all time offset values configured in the set of time offsets”). Regarding claim 5, 15, Huang further teaches that the determining a first time domain resource offset value set comprises: determining the first time domain resource offset value set based on a configuration of a network device ([0540], “the first UE is configured with a set of time offsets (e.g., a set of one or more time offsets comprising one or more K1’ values”). Regarding claim 6, 16, Huang further teaches that a quantity of bits of HARQ-ACK information to be fed back in each PSFCH reception occasion is related to one or more of the following parameters: the feedback period of the PSFCH ([0581], “the sidelink HARQ-ACK codebook size is equal to a product of N (such as 1) and a quantity (such as 8) of slots that each comprise a PSFCH region for sidelink HARQ-ACK and that each belong to the sidelink resource pool)”, it’s noted that N correspond to the feedback period of the PSFCH). Regarding claims 10, 20, Huang further teaches that the HARQ-ACK codebook comprises hybrid automatic repeat request acknowledgement HARQ-ACK information of a first preconfigured physical sidelink shared channel (CG PSSCH); and wherein at least one of the following is true: the first CG PSSCH is a CG PSSCH with a highest priority that is in a plurality of CG PSSCHs and through which the HARQ-ACK information is fed back to a network device ([0415]-[[0417], “priority rule is based on at least priority indication in the associated PSCCH/PSSCH”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8-9, 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al (US 2021/0168762 A1), in view of Ericsson, “On Fixed HARQ Codebook Design”. Regarding claim 8, 18, Huang teaches all of the limitations except that a size of the HARQ-ACK codebook is related to one or more of the following parameters: a total quantity of HARQ processes supported by a terminal device and a quantity of bits of HARQ-ACK information generated in each HARQ process. Ericsson teaches the above limitation (page 2, paragraph 5, “the fixed HARQ codebook size would be determined by the product of configured/specified HARQ processed and number of HARQ feedback bits required in the component carrier dimension”). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the teaching of Ericsson in the system disclosed by Huang. The benefit for combining would guarantee unique, reliable, and scalable HARQ-ACK feedback for multiple parallel HAQ processes while keeping latency and receiver complexity low. Regarding claim 9 and 19, the aforementioned references further teach that G-total SLHARQ=P* g_process HARQ-ACK, G-total SLHARQ is the size of the HARQ-ACK codebook, P is the total quantity of HARQ processes supported by the terminaldevice, and g_process HARQ-ACK is the quantity of bits of the HARQ-ACK information generated in each HARQ process (Ericsson, page 2, paragraph 5, “the fixed HARQ codebook size would be determined by the product of configured/specified HARQ processed and number of HARQ feedback bits required in the component carrier dimension”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIMING LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-3859. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIMING LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604342
INTRA-BAND ENHANCED MULTILINK SINGLE-RADIO COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592317
CONNECTED DEVICE FOR MEDICAL DEVICE TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12562995
EGRESS PACKET SCHEDULING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562827
Determining Default Beam and QCL Collision Handling
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556308
PROTECTION FOR DOWNLINK SIGNALING RADIO BEARER (SRB) SEGMENTATION OF A PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (PDU)
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month