Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/888,480

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CORRECTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 16, 2022
Examiner
ALLEN, KYLA GUAN-PING TI
Art Unit
2661
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Pixxel Space Technologies Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
47 granted / 53 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
83
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 53 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 09/09/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendments The amendment to claim 14 has been accepted and entered. Claims 1-14 are pending regarding this application. Claim Objections Claims 3, 12, and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 3 recites “a library for radiative transfer” in line 2. Please change to recite “the library for radiative transfer”, since the library in this step is previously claimed in claim 1, upon which claim 3 is dependent. Claim 12 recites “a ground leaving reflectance image” in line 2. Please change to recite “the ground leaving reflectance image”, since the ground leaving reflectance image in this step was previously claimed in claim 1, upon which claim 12 is dependent. Claim 14 recites an em dash “--” in line 14. This should be a singular dash “-”. Claim 14 recites “Digital” in line 6. Please replace with “digital”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance in line 6-7 and “the TOA radiance image” in lines 8-9. Here, it is unclear whether the TOA radiance in line 6-7 is the same as the TOA radiance image in lines 8-9. Similarly, claim 14 recites “a bottom of atmosphere radiance” in lines 3-4 and “a bottom—of-atmosphere (BOA) radiance image” in line 14. It is unclear whether the bottom of atmosphere radiance in lines 3-4 is equivalent to the bottom—of-atmosphere (BOA) radiance image in line 14. Claim 14 recites a “reflectance value image” in line 4 and “a BOA reflectance” in line 15. Here, it is unclear whether the reflectance value image in line 4 is equivalent or distinct from the BOA reflectance in line 15. Claim 14 recites “performing conversion of at-sensor image Digital number (DN) values to top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance and then to a TOA reflectance image” in lines 6-7. Here, it is unclear whether the at-sensor image Digital number (DN) values are being converted to top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance and then the at-sensor image Digital number (DN) values are being converted to a TOA reflectance image OR whether the at-sensor image Digital number (DN) values are being converted to top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance and then to top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance is converted to a TOA reflectance image. Below is a suggested amended recitation of claim 14 which would address the above claim objections and 112(b) rejections: 14. (Currently Amended) A method of hyperspectral image correction comprising: generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer model for converting an at-sensor digital number image from a hyperspectral satellite to a bottom-of-atmosphere (BOA) radiance image and a BOA reflectance value image; wherein the converting comprises: performing conversion of at-sensor image digital number (DN) values to a top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance image and then, performing conversion of the top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance image to a TOA reflectance image; creating a pre-classification layer using the TOA reflectance image to mask the TOA radiance image; performing an aerosol correction on a masked at-sensor radiance image by: applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation, and using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate the BOA radiance image; and converting the BOA radiance image to [[a]] the BOA reflectance value image. Reasons for Allowance Claim 14 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 1-13 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance and allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claim 1, the primary reason for allowance is that the prior art fails to teach or reasonably suggest generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Similarly, regarding claim 14, the primary reason for allowable subject matter is that the prior art fails to teach or reasonably suggest performing conversion of at-sensor image Digital number (DN) values to top-of- atmosphere (TOA) radiance and then to a TOA reflectance image; creating a pre-classification layer using the TOA reflectance image to mask the TOA radiance image; performing an aerosol correction on a masked at-sensor radiance image by: applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation, and using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom-of-atmosphere (BOA) radiance image; and converting the BOA radiance image to a BOA reflectance. The closest prior art, listed below, discloses creating a set of masks in a masked at-sensors radiance image, masks, a TOA reflectance image, performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image, aerosol correction, water vapor correction, performing aerosol correction by applying an albedo, and lookup tables, but fails to specifically disclose generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Ardouin (CA 2836210 C) teaches masks, a TOA reflectance image, aerosol correction, water vapor correction and lookup tables, but fails to teach implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks in a masked at-sensors radiance image, performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image, performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image, and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance, but fails to disclose generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Jin (US Publication No. 20090274387 A1) teaches to create a set of masks in a masked at-sensors radiance image, but fails to disclose generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Adler-Golden (US Patent No. 7337065 B2) teaches performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image, but fails to disclose generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Mariko (WO 2021038621 A1, see machine translation) teaches performing aerosol correction by applying an albedo, but fails to disclose generating one or more lookup tables with a radiative transfer library for converting a digital number of an at-sensor radiance image from a satellite to a top of atmosphere radiance and reflectance value to generate a top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectance image; implementing a pre-classification operations on the TOA reflectance image to create a set of masks to generate a masked at-sensors radiance image; performing aerosol correction on the masked at-sensors radiance image by applying a pixel-wise albedo estimation using the one or more lookup tables to generate an aerosol corrected radiance image; performing a water vapor correction on the aerosol corrected radiance image to generate a bottom of atmosphere radiance image; and converting the bottom of atmosphere radiance image to a ground leaving reflectance. Claims 2-13 are allowable by virtue of their dependency upon allowable claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLA G ALLEN whose telephone number is (703)756-5315. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30am - 4:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Villecco can be reached on (571) 272-7319. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kyla Guan-Ping Tiao Allen/ Examiner, Art Unit 2661 /JOHN VILLECCO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 18, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 28, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 31, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Sep 09, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597119
OPERATING METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING PROCESSOR EXECUTING SEMICONDUCTOR LAYOUT SIMULATION MODULE BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588594
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING LENGTHS OF PARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591963
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENHANCING DEFECT DETECTION IN OPTICAL CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEMS USING A DIGITAL FILTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12548152
INTRACRANIAL ARTERY STENOSIS DETECTION METHOD AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12541833
ASSESSING IMAGE/VIDEO QUALITY USING AN ONLINE MODEL TO APPROXIMATE SUBJECTIVE QUALITY VALUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 53 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month