Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/888,789

AD HOC GROUP BASED SERVICES TO SUPPORT 5G SYSTEM (5GS) SCENARIOS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 16, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, PABLO N
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
548 granted / 656 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 656 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1- 3-7, 18, 20, 23-27, and 29-34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liao (US 20210075631) and in view of Manion et al. (hereinafter, “Manion”, US 20230103760). As per claims 1 and 20, Liao disclosed a method, comprising the steps of dynamically configurations an ad hoc group of user equipment (see at least abstract), the ad hoc group of user equipment comprising one or more user equipment (see 0043. 0055, 0081-0083, 0088-0089). Liao disclosed such variations of configurations of ad hoc group but not explicitly such teaching of determining and creating an ad hoc group by a node. However, Manion disclosed such claimed limitation of determining and creating an ad hoc group by a node (see col. 2/ ln. 62-col. 3/ln. 6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention for Liao to form such groups, as taught by Manion, to easily track group members. The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose wherein the node comprises an application function configured to interact with a 5th generation core network 5GC of a 5ᵗʰ generation system 5GS via a network exposure function of the 5GC (see Liao, at least abstract) or a session management function of the 5GC (see Liao, at least abstract & 0029, fig. 2-9); and creating, by the node, the ad hoc group of user equipment, wherein the creating comprises generating group information for the ad hoc group of user equipment (see Manion, see col. 2/ ln. 62-col. 3/ln. 6), and wherein the group information for the ad hoc of user equipment comprises an external ad hoc group identifier that identifies the ad hoc group of user equipment (see at least 0057-0060); and information indicative of a lifetime of the ad hoc group of user equipment (see Manion, col. 10/ln. 16-20 and col. 11/ln. 60-col. 12/ln. 16); and sending, to a user data storage entity, a request to store the group information for the ad hoc group of user equipment, the request comprising the group information for the ad hoc group of user equipment for storage at the user data storage entity (see Liao, fig. 11, 0078, 086, 0146 and throughout the reference). As per claims 3 and 23, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose at least one of a group type indicating a type of the ad hoc group of user equipment (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18); identities of the one or more user equipment comprised in the ad hoc group (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18); information indicative of a property or an application or use case related to the one or more user equipment (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18); or an indication of which of the one or more user equipment of the dynamic group members of the ad hoc group are members of a pre-defined or subscribed group (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18). As per claims 4 and 24, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose at least one of a tracking area identifier, a cell identifier, location coordinates the one or more user equipment comprised in the ad hoc group of user equipment (see Liao, 0021-0022, 0043, 0059-0060, and throughout the reference; see Manion, 0013, 0078, 0107 TABLE 0003); an indication of which user equipment of the one or more user equipment have the joined a certain multicast content; an indication of time synchronization service area for a given time domain serving area; an indication of which user equipment of the one or more user equipment are served by an entity comprising an application running thereon; or an indication of a user plane node serving the one or more user equipment comprised in the ad hoc group of user equipment (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18). As per claims 5 and 25, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the determining comprises identifying the one or more user equipment to be included in the ad hoc group for a specific use case or application (see Liao, at least 0056-0062; see Manion, at least col. 2/ln. 17-col. 3/ln. 18). As per claims 6 and 26, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose updating or deleting the group information when a change to the ad hoc group occurs (see Liao, 0149). As per claims 7 and 27, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose receiving a request to subscribe to notifications specific to the ad hoc group, wherein the request includes the ad hoc group identifier (see Liao, abstract, 0058 and throughout the reference). As per claim 18, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose at least one processor (see at least Liao, fig. 11); and at least one memory (see at least Liao, fig. 11). As per claims 29 and 30, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the information indicative of a lifetime of the ad hoc group comprises information indicative of a time duration of the ad hoc group (see Manion, col. 10/ln. 16-20 and col. 11/ln. 60-col. 12/ln. 16). As per claim 31, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the one or more user equipment comprised in the ad-hoc group are user equipment that are participating in a multi-user game (see Manion, col. 1/ln. 15-18). As per claim 32, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the ad hoc group of user equipment is for time synchronization (see Manion, col. 10/ln. 16-20 and col. 11/ln. 60-col. 12/ln. 16). As per claim 33, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the one or more user equipment comprised in the ad-hoc group are user equipment that are part of a vehicle platoon (see Liao, 0017, 0019, 0113). As per claim 34, The improve communication method of tracking ad hoc group of Liao and Manion further disclose the determining is based on a criteria, wherein the criteria comprise the one or more user equipment are anchored at a same protocol data unit session anchor user plane function (PSA-UPF) of the 5GC network or the one or more user equipment are running applications on a same edge application server (EAS) of the 5G system (see Liao, 0062, 0114, 0144), 0207). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1, 18, and 20 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Pablo Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-7898. The examiner normal hours are 9:30 -5:00 (Monday-Friday). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) System. Status information for Published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see httpr//pair-directauspto.gov. Should You have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (in USA or CANADA) or 571-272-1000. February 12, 2026 PABLO N TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 20, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592724
RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581432
MAXIMUM POWER REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567875
Coupling Mitigation for Coextensive Signal Paths with Resonant Matching Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557041
CONTROLLING NETWORK PARTICIPANTS TO SELECT RADIO POWER LEVELS THAT BEST SERVE THE NETWORK AND INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543124
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING POWER HEADROOM REPORT FOR MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS IN NEXT GENERATION MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 656 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month