Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/890,611

COIL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 18, 2022
Examiner
BARNES, MALCOLM
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
364 granted / 454 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
468
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 454 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 08/18/2022 has been considered. Claim Objections Claim 19 is objected to for the typo “the cover surface having a first cover surface contacting the second surface and...”. Correction to “the cover portion having a first cover surface contacting the second surface and...” is suggested. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choi, Chinese Patent CN104916390A. Regarding Claim 1, Choi teaches (except where italicized), a coil component (Fig. 5) comprising: a body (10) having a first surface (bottom) and a second surface (top) opposing in a thickness direction, and a first side surface (front) and a second side surface (back) opposing in a width direction while each connecting the first surface and the second surface to each other; a coil unit (70) disposed in the body; first and second external electrodes (41, 42) disposed to be spaced apart from each other on the body, while respectively being connected to the coil unit; and a cover portion (not shown, “cover layer” [0067]) disposed on the second surface of the body and at least partially covering the first and second external electrodes (“multiple magnetic layers 50 can be stacked on the upper and lower parts of the inner coil section to form an upper cover layer and a lower cover layer (not shown)” [0067] comprises “a cover portion disposed on the second surface of the body and at least partially covering the first and second external electrodes”), wherein a cross-section (the body 10 comprises a cross-section above and below the inner conductor pattern 70 comprising the same size in the with and thickness direction) perpendicular to the first surface of the body and parallel to the width direction and traversing the body and the cover portion has substantially the same size in the width direction and in the thickness direction. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0067], [0070], [0105]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-6, 8-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi, in view of Adachi et al. (hereinafter Adachi), U.S. Patent Application Publication 2014/0362491. Regarding Claim 2 and similarly claim 3, Choi teaches a cover portion (not shown, “cover layer” [0067]). (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0067], [0070], [0105]). Choi does not explicitly teach, the cover portion has a first cover surface contacting the second surface of the body, a second cover surface opposing the first cover surface, and opposite cover side surfaces opposing each other while each connecting the first cover surface and the second cover surface to each other, and the opposite cover side surfaces are coplanar with the opposite side surfaces of the body, respectively. However, Adachi teaches (Fig. 3(A)), the cover portion has a first cover surface (bottom (24), Fig. 3(A) contacting the second surface of the body, a second cover surface (top) opposing the first cover surface, and opposite cover side surfaces (Fig. 3(A)) opposing each other while each connecting the first cover surface and the second cover surface to each other, and the opposite cover side surfaces are coplanar with the opposite side surfaces of the body, respectively. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019], [0044], [0048]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the body of Choi to include the surfaces of Adachi, the motivation being to provide “a composite substrate 22 structured to have a ceramic dielectric layer 23 and a ceramic magnetic layer 24 stacked” [0019]. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019]). Therefore, the limitation of Claim 2 would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 4, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, wherein the cover portion includes a magnetic material of a same ingredient as the body (“soft magnetic materials can be used to form the ceramic body 10” [0071]. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0071]). Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, wherein an interface (interface between, (22), (23), Fig. 3(A)) is formed between the cover portion and the body, the motivation being to provide “a composite substrate 22 structured to have a ceramic dielectric layer 23 and a ceramic magnetic layer 24 stacked” [0019]. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019]). Regarding Claim 6 and similarly claim 8, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, further comprising a substrate (60) disposed in the body, wherein the coil unit (70) includes first and second coil patterns (coil patterns of 70) disposed on opposite surfaces of the substrate, respectively, a first via (not shown, Fig. 5, “through electrodes” [0078]) penetrating through the substrate to connect the first and second coil patterns to each other, and first and second lead-out portions (71, 72) connected to the first and second external electrodes, respectively. (Choi: Fig. 5, machine translation, para. [0078], [0082]). Regarding Claim 9, Choi teaches (except where italicized), a coil component (Fig. 5) comprising: a body (10) having a first surface (bottom) and a second surface (top) opposing in a thickness direction, a first side surface (front) and a second side surface (back) opposing in a width direction while each connecting the first surface and the second surface to each other, and a first end surface (left) and a second end surface (right) opposing in a length direction while each connecting the first side surface and the second side surface to each other; a substrate (60) disposed in the body; a coil unit (70) disposed on the substrate; first and second external electrodes (41, 42) disposed to be spaced apart from each other on the first surface of the body, while respectively being connected to the coil unit; and a cover portion (not shown, “cover layer” [0067]) disposed on the second surface of the body, wherein a cross-section perpendicular to the length direction and traversing the body and the cover portion has substantially the same size in the width direction and in the thickness direction. Choi does not explicitly teach, wherein a cross-section perpendicular to the length direction and traversing the body and the cover portion has substantially the same size in the width direction and in the thickness direction. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0067], [0070], [0078], [0105]). However, Adachi teaches (Fig. 3(A)), wherein a cross-section perpendicular to the length direction and traversing the body (22, 23, 24) and the cover portion (24) has substantially the same size in the width direction and in the thickness direction (“0.5 mm” [0048]). (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019], [0044], [0048]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the body of Choi to include the cross-section having the same size in the width direction and in the thickness direction of Adachi, the motivation being to provide “a composite substrate 22 structured to have a ceramic dielectric layer 23 and a ceramic magnetic layer 24 stacked” [0019]. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019]). Therefore, the limitation of Claim 9 would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 10 and similarly claim 11, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches (Adachi: Fig. 3(a)), wherein the cover portion has a first cover surface (bottom (24), Fig. 3(A) contacting the second surface of the body, a second cover surface (top) opposing the first cover surface, and opposite cover side surfaces (Fig. 3(A)) opposing each other while each connecting the first cover surface and the second cover surface to each other, and the opposite cover side surfaces of the cover portion are coplanar with the opposite side surfaces of the body, respectively, the motivation being to provide “a composite substrate 22 structured to have a ceramic dielectric layer 23 and a ceramic magnetic layer 24 stacked” [0019]. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019], [0044], [0048]). Regarding Claim 12, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, wherein the cover portion includes a magnetic material of a same ingredient as the body (“soft magnetic materials can be used to form the ceramic body 10” [0071]. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0071]). Regarding Claim 13, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, wherein an interface (interface between, (22), (23), Fig. 3(A)) is formed between the cover portion and the body, the motivation being to provide “a composite substrate 22 structured to have a ceramic dielectric layer 23 and a ceramic magnetic layer 24 stacked” [0019]. (Adachi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0019]). Regarding Claim 15, the combination of Choi in view of Adachi further teaches, wherein the coil unit (70) includes first and second coil patterns (coil patterns of 70) disposed on opposite surfaces of the substrate, respectively, a first via (not shown, Fig. 5, “through electrodes” [0078]) penetrating through the substrate to connect the first and second coil patterns to each other, and first and second lead-out portions (71, 72) connected to the first and second external electrodes, respectively. (Choi: Fig. 5, machine translation, para. [0078], [0082]). Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi, in view of Adachi, as applied to claim 1, and further in view of Choi et al. (hereinafter Choi 2), U.S. Patent Application Publication 2016/0268038. Regarding Claim 18, Choi teaches a thin-film inductor. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0068]). Choi does not explicitly teach, wherein the coil unit is a wire-wound type coil. However, Choi 2 teaches (Fig. 2), wherein the coil unit is a wire-wound type coil (“the coil may be formed of a metal wire” [0101]). (Choi 2: Figs. 1-5, para. [0101]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the thin-film inductor of Choi in view of Adachi to include the wire wound inductor of Choi 2, the motivation being “coil 40 is not necessarily limited to the plating process as described above, and the coil may be formed of a metal wire” [0101]. (Choi 2: Figs. 1-5, para. [0101]). Therefore, the limitation of Claim 18 would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yoon et al. (US 20190259527), Yoo et al. (US 20140062615), Lim et al. (US 20200118729), and Suzuki et al. (US 20160012961). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 14, 16 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if any of claims 7, 14 and 16 are rewritten in independent form including all of the limitation of the base claims and any intervening claims. Claim 7 and similarly claim 14 recite, inter alia, “…further comprising an insulating film covering the coil unit and the substrate together, wherein a mean shortest distance T2 between the insulating film and the first surface of the body is equal to a sum of a mean shortest distance Ti between the insulating film and the second surface of the body and a mean shortest distance T3 between the first cover surface and the second cover surface”. (Emphasis added). Claim 16 recites, inter alia, “…wherein the first external electrode includes a first pad portion disposed on the first surface of the body, and a first connection portion connecting the first lead-out portion and the first pad portion to each other, the second external electrode includes a second pad portion disposed on the first surface of the body, and a second connection portion connecting the second lead-out portion and the second pad portion to each other, and each of the first and second connection portions penetrates through inside of the body”. (Emphasis added). Claim 17 recites, inter alia, “…wherein the coil unit further includes a second via penetrating through the substrate to connect the second lead-out portion and the second connection portion to each other”. (Emphasis added). Reason for Allowance Claims 19-23, are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 19 recites, inter alia, “…a coil component comprising: a body having a first surface and a second surface opposing the first surface in a thickness direction; a coil unit embedded in the body, the coil unit being disposed on a first substrate surface parallel to the first and second surfaces of the body; a cover portion disposed on the second surface, the cover surface having a first cover surface contacting the second surface and a second cover surface opposing the first cover surface in the thickness direction; an insulating film covering the coil unit, wherein a mean shortest distance T2 between the insulating film and the first surface of the body is equal to a sum of a mean shortest distance Ti between the insulating film and the second surface of the body and a mean shortest distance T3 between the first cover surface and the second cover surface. (Emphasis added). The references of record do not teach or suggest the aforementioned limitation, nor would it be obvious to modify those references to include such limitation. CN104916390A (Choi) discloses (except where italicized) inter alia, a coil component (Fig. 5) comprising: a body (10) having a first surface (bottom) and a second surface (top) opposing the first surface in a thickness direction; a coil unit (70) embedded in the body, the coil unit being disposed on a first substrate surface (substrate 60) parallel to the first and second surfaces of the body; a cover portion (not shown, “cover layer” [0067]) disposed on the second surface, the cover [portion] having a first cover surface contacting the second surface and a second cover surface opposing the first cover surface in the thickness direction (“multiple magnetic layers 50 can be stacked on the upper and lower parts of the inner coil section to form an upper cover layer and a lower cover layer (not shown)” [0067] comprises “a first cover surface contacting the second surface and a second cover surface opposing the first cover surface in the thickness direction”); an insulating film covering the coil unit, wherein a mean shortest distance T2 between the insulating film and the first surface of the body is equal to a sum of a mean shortest distance Ti between the insulating film and the second surface of the body and a mean shortest distance T3 between the first cover surface and the second cover surface. (Choi: Figs. 1-5, machine translation, para. [0067], [0070], [0078], [0105]). Choi doesn’t disclose, at least, an insulating film covering the coil unit, wherein a mean shortest distance T2 between the insulating film and the first surface of the body is equal to a sum of a mean shortest distance Ti between the insulating film and the second surface of the body and a mean shortest distance T3 between the first cover surface and the second cover surface. Claims 20-23, are allowed because each claim is directly or indirectly dependent of independent Claim 19. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALCOLM BARNES whose telephone number is (408)918-7512. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5:00 pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit http s://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MALCOLM BARNES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837 1/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603219
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603216
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597549
THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF TRANSFORMER WINDINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592334
STACKED MAGNETIC INDUCTOR AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586711
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+6.6%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 454 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month