Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/890,827

PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETERS HAVING FLOW DIVERTING FEATURES

Final Rejection §102§DP
Filed
Aug 18, 2022
Examiner
BOSWORTH, KAMI A
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
667 granted / 974 resolved
-1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
76 currently pending
Career history
1050
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 974 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: The amendment to claim 6 appears to be grammatically incorrect. It is suggested to amend claim 6 to recite “a center longitudinal axis of at least a portion of the side port extending from the sidewall of the catheter adapterextends at least substantially non-parallel to a center longitudinal axis of the catheter, and wherein a plane of the center longitudinal axis of the catheter is parallel to and non-coincident with a plane of the center longitudinal axis of the side port”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Due to the amendments made to claim 6, the terms “plane” and “center longitudinal axis” in the phrase “the plane of the center longitudinal axis of the catheter adapter” of claim 9 now lack proper antecedent basis (since claim 6 only introduces “planes” and “center longitudinal axes” of the catheter and the side port, not of the catheter adapter). This phrase should be amended to recite “[[the]] a plane of [[the]] a center longitudinal axis of the catheter adapter”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 6, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yagi et al. (PG PUB 2013/0028841). Re claim 6, Yagi discloses a peripheral intravenous catheter (as seen Fig 2) comprising: a catheter adapter 1 (Fig 2,4) having a proximal end (to the right in Fig 2) and a distal end (to the left in Fig 2) and a sidewall 2 (Fig 4) forming a lumen (as seen in Fig 6) that extends therebetween; a catheter 103+303 that extends from the distal end (as seen in Fig 2); a side port 5 (Fig 4) that extends outwardly from the sidewall of the catheter adapter (as seen in Fig 4), the side port being in fluid communication with the lumen of the catheter adapter (via opening 15, as seen in Fig 6,8; Para 58), wherein: a center longitudinal axis (extending vertically in Fig 8) of at least a portion of the side port extending from the sidewall of the catheter adapter (as seen in Fig 8), the center longitudinal axis extending at least substantially non-parallel to a center longitudinal axis D (extending into the page in Fig 8, Para 73) of the catheter (as seen in 8, Para 73), and wherein a plane (shown in dotted line in annotated Fig A below) of the center longitudinal axis of the catheter is parallel to and non-coincident with a plane (shown in dashed line in annotated Fig A below) of the center longitudinal axis of the side port (as seen in Fig 8 and annotated Fig A below). PNG media_image1.png 353 715 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 9, Yagi discloses that the longitudinal axis of the side port is substantially parallel to but offset from a plane of a longitudinal axis (coincident with longitudinal axis D of the catheter 103+303) of the catheter adapter (the plane of the longitudinal axis of the catheter adapter 1 is the same as plane of the center longitudinal axis of catheter 103+303; as seen in annotated Fig A above, the longitudinal axis of the side port 5 is parallel to but offset from the plane of the catheter adapter). Re claim 10, Yagi discloses a flow diverting feature (the reduction in diameter from portion 22 to opening 15, as seen in Fig 9) configured to divert fluid flowing through the side port and into the lumen in a proximal direction (Para 74,77; as seen in Fig 10). Double Patenting The amendments to claim 6 filed 11/12/2025 overcome the nonstatutory double patenting rejection set forth in the last Office Action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 11/12/2025 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAMI A BOSWORTH whose telephone number is (571)270-5414. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Sirmons can be reached at (571)272-4965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAMI A BOSWORTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP
Nov 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 03, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582807
VALVE BODY AND MEDICAL INSTRUMENT PROVIDED WITH VALVE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569653
BALLOON CATHETERS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12551677
PEEL AWAY HEMOSTASIS VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551612
PUMP ASSEMBLY WITH SWITCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551370
OCULAR PLATFORMS AND SURGICAL TOOLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+29.8%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 974 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month