Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/891,393

Wearable Robot

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 19, 2022
Priority
Feb 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0022514
Examiner
LEBRON DE JESUS, GRACIELA NATALIA
Art Unit
3785
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
31%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 31% of cases
31%
Career Allowance Rate
5 granted / 16 resolved
-38.7% vs TC avg
Strong +71% interview lift
Without
With
+70.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
43
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
92.1%
+52.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 16 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments This office action is responsive to Request for Reconsideration filed on 03/19/2026. As directed by the amendment: claims 2 - 21 are pending, claim 1 was cancelled, claim 21 has been added & claims 2, 3,8, 9, 19 & 20 have been amended. Applicant's arguments filed 03/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues the reference of Jian does not disclose the limitations of claim 12 as it does not disclose that the second link od the left link and the second link od the right link intersect with each other in the left-right direction, however, claim 12 does not expressly disclose this limitation and based on the broadest reasonable interpretation the limitation is not interpreted as intersecting with each other. Based on this, the rejection for claim 12 still stands and is not allowable. Applicant's arguments filed 03/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues claim 19 is allowable based on the remarks for claim 12, however, claim 12 maintains its rejection making claim 19 maintain its rejection as well. Applicant's arguments filed 03/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues claim 21 is allowable based on the remarks for claim 12, however, claim 12 maintains its rejection making claim 21 maintain its rejection as well. Claim Objections Claims 2 – 11 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because the claims do not refer to a preceding claim. See MPEP § 608.01(n). Examiner suggest canceling claims 2 – 11 and adding them as new claims after claim 21 so they can refer to a preceding claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 2, 3, 8 & 12 – 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Jian et al. (CN 105662783 B). Regarding claim 2, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein the third link 2204 is located behind the second link 2202 (Figure 3 discloses the links to be parallel to each other and, based on the direction of the back of the user, the third link is behind the second link). Regarding claim 3, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein a direction in which the second link 2202 extends is parallel to a direction in which the third link 2204 extends (Page 8, first paragraph). Regarding claim 8, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein a first virtual line (see annotated Figure 3.3) extending from a first region in which the first link 2201 is coupled to the second link 2202 and a second region in which the first link 2201 is coupled to the third link 2204 is parallel to a second virtual line (see annotated Figure 3.3) extending from a third region in which the second link 2202 is coupled to the fourth link 2203 and a fourth region in which the third link 2204 is coupled to the fourth link 2203 (Annotated figure 3.3 discloses the virtual lines based on the couplings of each of the links). PNG media_image1.png 410 780 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure 3.3: Annotated Figure 3 Regarding claim 12, A wearable robot comprising: a rear body unit 1300 configured to be provided in close contact with a rear side of a user (Figure 2), the rear body unit 1300 comprising a first link (Note: the examiner considers this to be the combination of 2001, 2100 & 1000 as seen on both arms in Figure 1); and a link module 2200 & 3100 (Figure 3 & 4) having a first side coupled to the rear body unit 1300 and a second side configured to be positioned on a shoulder of the user 300 (Figure 1), the link module 2000 & 3000 comprising: a second link 2202 rotatably coupled to a first side of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3); a third link 2204 rotatably coupled to a second side of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3); and a fourth link 2203 & 3100 having a first side rotatably coupled to the second link 2202 (Figure 3) and a second side rotatably coupled to the third link 2204, the fourth link 2203 & 3100 being configured to extend to the shoulder of the user (Page 7, last paragraph – Page 8, first paragraph) a right link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the right shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a right shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); and a left link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the left shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a left shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); and wherein a first region in which the second link 2202 of the right link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 is located on the left of a second region in which the second link 2202 of the left link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 2 discloses the second links connected to the first link). Regarding claim 13, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein a third region (see annotated Figure 2.2) in which the third link 2004 of the right link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 is located on the left of a fourth region (see annotated Figure 2.2) in which the third link 2004 of the left link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 2 & 3). PNG media_image2.png 652 623 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure 2.2: Annotated Figure 2 Regarding claim 14, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein: the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 of the right link module are rotatably coupled to a top surface or a bottom surface of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000; (Page 7, Last paragraph – Page 8, first paragraph) and the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 of the left link module are rotatably coupled to the other of the top surface or the bottom surface of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000. (Page 7, last paragraph – Page 8, first paragraph). Regarding claim 15, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian discloses wherein the first link 2201, 2100 & 1000 comprises: a first-first link member 2102 (Figure 3); and a first-second link member 2201 rotatably coupled to a first side of the first-first link member 2102 (Page 7, last paragraph), wherein each of the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 is rotatably coupled to a first side of the first-second link member 2201 (Page 8, first paragraph). Regarding claim 16, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 15. Jian discloses wherein: the first-second link member 2201 is coupled to the first-first link member 2102 so as to be rotatable in an up-down direction (Page 7, first paragraph); and each of the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 is coupled to the first-second link member 2201 so as to be rotatable in a horizontal direction (Page 7, last paragraph / Page 8, first paragraph). Regarding claim 17, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 16. Jian discloses wherein: the first-second link member 2201 is coupled to a front-rear direction side surface of the first-first link member 2102 (see annotated Figure 3.4); and each of the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 is coupled to a top surface or a bottom surface of the first-second link member 2201 (Figure 3 discloses the links being connected to the bottom surface). PNG media_image3.png 393 649 media_image3.png Greyscale Figure 3.4: Annotated Figure 3 Regarding claim 18, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 17. Jian discloses wherein: two first-second link members 2201 are provided in the first link 2201, 2100 & 1000; a right end of the first-second link member 2201, which is coupled to the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 provided in the right link module (Figure 3), of the two first-second link members 2201 is rotatably coupled to a right end of a rear surface of the first-first link member 2201, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3); and a left end of the first-second link member 2201, which is coupled to the second link 2202 and the third link 2204 provided in the left link module (Figure 2 & 3), of the two first-second link members 2201 is rotatably coupled to a left end of a front surface of the first-first link member 2201, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3). Regarding claim 19, A wearable robot comprising: a rear body unit 1300 configured to be provided in close contact with a rear side of a user (Figure 2), the rear body unit 1300 comprising a first link (Note: the examiner considers this to be the combination of 2201, 2103, 2102, 2101 & 1000 as seen on both arms in Figure 1); and a link module 2200 & 3100 (Figure 3 & 4) having a first side coupled to the rear body unit 200 and a second side configured to be positioned on a shoulder of the user 300 (Figure 1), the link module 2200 & 3100 comprising: a second link 2202 rotatably coupled (Note: the examiner considers this as where they are coupled, they are able to rotate) to a first side of the first link 2201 (Figure 3 / Page 8, Paragraph 1); a third link 2204 rotatably coupled (Note: the examiner considers this as where they are coupled, they are able to rotate) to a second side of the first link 2201 (Figure 3 / Page 8, Paragraph 1); and a fourth link 2203 & 3100 having a first side rotatably coupled to the second link 2202 (Figure 3) and a second side rotatably coupled to the third link 2204, the fourth link 2203 & 3100 being configured to extend to the shoulder of the user (Page 7, last paragraph – Page 8, first paragraph); a right link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the right shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a right shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); a left link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the left shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a left shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); and a joint module 3200 & 3300 rotatably coupled to a first region (Note: the examiner considers this to be where 3100 is found) of the fourth link 2203 & 3100, the first region (Note: the examiner considers this to be where 3100 is found) being configured to wrap the shoulder of the user (Page 8, Paragraph 2) , and configured to be in contact with an arm of the user (Figure 1), the joint module comprising: a shoulder link rotatably 3000, 4000 & 5000 coupled to the fourth link 2203 & 3100 and configured to wrap the shoulder of the user (Figure 1); an upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 rotatably provided on the shoulder link 2203 & 3100 (Page 8, Paragraph 2) and configured to wrap an upper region of the arm of the user and extend to an elbow of the user (Figure 1); and a lower link rotatably 5000 provided on the upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 and configured to wrap a lower region of the arm of the user (Figure 1), wherein a second region in which the second link 2202 of the right link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 is located in the left of a third region in which the second link 2202 of the left link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 2 discloses the second links connected to the first link). Regarding claim 20, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in of claim 19. Jian discloses wherein the joint module 3200 & 3300 further comprises: an upper power assistant part provided in a second region in which the shoulder link 3000, 4000 & 5000 is coupled to the upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 and configured to provide rotational force that assists rotation of the upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 with respect to the shoulder link 3200, 3300 & 4000 (Page 8, Paragraph 2); and a lower power assistant part provided in a third region in which the upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 is coupled to the lower link 5000 and configured to provide rotational force that assists rotation of the lower link 5000 with respect to the upper link 3200, 3300 & 4000 (Page 9, Paragraph 3). Regarding claim 21, A wearable robot comprising: a rear body unit 1300 configured to be provided in close contact with a rear side of a user (Figure 2), the rear body unit 1300 comprising a first link (Note: the examiner considers this to be the combination of 2001, 2100 & 1000 as seen on both arms in Figure 1); and a link module 2200 & 3100 (Figure 3 & 4) having a first side coupled to the rear body unit 1300 and a second side configured to be positioned on a shoulder of the user 300 (Figure 1), the link module 2000 & 3000 comprising: a second link 2202 rotatably coupled to a first side of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3); a third link 2204 rotatably coupled to a second side of the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 3), wherein the third link 2204 is located behind the second link 2202 (Figure 3 discloses the links to be parallel to each other and, based on the direction of the back of the user, the third link is behind the second link) and wherein a direction in which the second link 2202 extends is parallel to a direction in which the third link 2204 extends (Page 8, first paragraph); and a fourth link 2203 & 3100 having a first side rotatably coupled to the second link 2202 (Figure 3) and a second side rotatably coupled to the third link 2204, the fourth link 2203 & 3100 being configured to extend to the shoulder of the user (Page 7, last paragraph – Page 8, first paragraph) a right link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the right shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a right shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); and a left link module (Note: the examiner considers this to be the left shoulder of the user on Figure 2) having a first side coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 and a second side configured to be positioned on a left shoulder of the user (Figure 2 discloses both sides of the users shoulders have the same mechanisms on each side); and wherein a first region in which the second link 2202 of the right link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 is located on the left of a second region in which the second link 2202 of the left link module is coupled to the first link 2001, 2100 & 1000 (Figure 2 discloses the second links connected to the first link). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 – 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jian et al. (CN 105662783 B) Regarding claim 4, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 3. Jian discloses wherein the second link 2202 comprises: a second-first link region (see annotated Figure 3) having a first side rotatably coupled (Note: the examiner considers this as where they are coupled, they are able to rotate / Page 8, Paragraph 1) to the first link 2201 and extending to outside in a left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (see annotated Figure 3.2); and a second-second link region (see annotated Figure 3) extending from a left-right direction outer end of the second-first link region to the outside in the left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (see annotated Figure 3.2) Jian does not disclose wherein the second-second link region extends to be inclined upward. Regarding the shape of the second-second link region, the courts have held that a change in shape alone, without demonstration of the criticality of a specific limitation, may be considered obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. “In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966), [t]he court held that the configuration of the claimed disposable plastic nursing container was a matter of choice which a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found obvious absent persuasive evidence that the particular configuration of the claimed container was significant.” MPEP § 2144.04-IV-B. PNG media_image4.png 427 726 media_image4.png Greyscale Figure 3.2: Annotated Figure 3 Regarding claim 5, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 4. Jian discloses wherein: the second link 2202 further comprises a second-third link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) extending from a left-right direction outer end of the second-second link (see annotated Figure 3.2) region to the outside in the left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (Figure 3); and the fourth link 2203 is rotatably coupled (Note: the examiner considers this as where they are coupled, they are able to rotate / Page 8, Paragraph 1) to the second-third link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) (Figure 3). Regarding claim 6, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 3. Jian discloses wherein the third link comprises: a third-first link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) having a first side rotatably coupled to the first link and extending to the outside in a left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (Figure 3 / Page 8, first paragraph); and a third-second link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) extending from a left-right direction outer end of the third-first link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) to the outside in the left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (Figure 3). Jian does not disclose wherein the third-second link region extends to be inclined upward. Regarding the shape of the second-second link region, the courts have held that a change in shape alone, without demonstration of the criticality of a specific limitation, may be considered obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art. “In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966), [t]he court held that the configuration of the claimed disposable plastic nursing container was a matter of choice which a person of ordinary skill in the art would have found obvious absent persuasive evidence that the particular configuration of the claimed container was significant.” MPEP § 2144.04-IV-B. Regarding claim 7, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 6. Jian discloses wherein: the third link 2204 further comprises a third-third link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) extending from a left-right direction outer end of the third-second link region (see annotated Figure 3.2) to the outside in the left-right direction (Note: the examiner considers “left-right direction” to be an alternative of left or right direction) (Figure 3); and the fourth link is rotatably coupled to the third-third link region. (see annotated Figure 3.2) Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jian et al. (CN 105662783 B) as claimed in claim 1, in view of Weidner et al. (WO 2020038850 A1). Regarding claim 9, Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 12. Jian does not disclose further comprising a shoulder wrapping unit having a first side coupled to the rear body unit and configured to extend from the first side via a back and the shoulder of the user to wrap a front surface of the user. Weidner discloses further comprising a shoulder wrapping unit 18 having a first side coupled to the rear body unit 20 and configured to extend from the first side via a back and the shoulder of the user to wrap a front surface of the user. (Page 4, Paragraph 8) It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to modify the rear body unit of Jian to include further comprising a shoulder wrapping unit having a first side coupled to the rear body unit and configured to extend from the first side via a back and the shoulder of the user to wrap a front surface of the user as it would ensure the transmission of power or integrated into a textile garment which encloses the shoulders of the user. (Page 4, Paragraph 8 / Figure 2) Claim 10 & 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jian et al. (CN 105662783 B) in view of Weidner et al. (WO 2020038850 A1) as claimed in claim 9, in view of Romo et al. (US 20180303699 A1). Regarding claim 10, Modified Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 9. Modified Jian does not disclose further comprising a waist wrapping unit having a first side coupled to the rear body unit and configured to wrap a waist of the user. Romo discloses further comprising a waist wrapping unit 104 having a first side coupled to the rear body unit 102 and configured to wrap a waist of the user 106 (Figure 3 / Paragraph 0014) It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to further modify Jian to include a waist wrapping unit having a first side coupled to the rear body unit and configured to wrap a waist of the user as it would form a counter force for the torque paced on the posterior device and it is able to create lumbar support by reducing the posteriorly-directed felt force on the anterior body in combination with the base support. (Paragraph 0014) Regarding claim 11, Modified Jian discloses the wearable robot as claimed in claim 10. Modified Jian does not disclose wherein a second side of the shoulder wrapping unit is coupled and fixed to the waist wrapping unit. Romo discloses wherein a second side of the shoulder wrapping unit 106 is coupled and fixed to the waist wrapping unit 104 (Paragraph 0062) It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to further modify Jian to include wherein a second side of the shoulder wrapping unit is coupled and fixed to the waist wrapping unit as it would allow the strap assembly permits downward pulling of the straps at a location, such as the waist or abdomen, which is easier for a geriatric individual to pull than at the shoulders. (Paragraph 0058) Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRACIELA NATALIA LEBRON DE JESUS whose telephone number is (571)270-3892. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-5:00 CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kendra Carter can be reached at 571-272-9034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRACIELA NATALIA LEBRON DE JESUS/Examiner, Art Unit 3785 /KENDRA D CARTER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 19, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629492
CONNECTION COMPONENT FOR A TRACHEAL CANNULA, IN PARTICULAR FOR PROTECTING AGAINST AN UNINTENTIONAL CLOSURE OF SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12496251
HAND-HELD LOW-NOISE SHOCK-ABSORBING ELECTRIC MASSAGER
3y 8m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12447091
Headache Treatment Assembly
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12376947
ORAL CAVITY CLEANER FOR AUTOMATICALLY SUCKING CONTAMINATED WATER FOR WASHING ORAL CAVITY
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 05, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 4 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
31%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+70.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 16 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month