Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/892,926

ILLUMINATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 22, 2022
Examiner
FEATHERLY, HANA SANEI
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Savant Technologies LLC
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
470 granted / 645 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
675
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 645 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/17/2026 has been entered. Claim(s) 1-12 are pending in the instant application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55, which papers have been placed of record in the file. Drawings The drawings were received on 8/22/2022. These drawings are considered acceptable by Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim(s) 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 1 recites the broad recitation “configured to drive at least one of the canless light or a night light” and the claim also recites “the first electric appliance has a first end directly electrically connected to and configured to drive a canless light” which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. In order to expedite prosecution, Examiner recommends modifying line 7, of claim 1 to recite “configured to drive a canless light or a night light”. Alternatively, the omission of the nightlight altogether would also resolve the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) issue presented otherwise. Claim(s) 2-12 are rejected at least for their dependency on Claim 1. America Invents Act In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Allowable Subject Matter As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). See claim objection/rejection above. A. Claim(s) 1-12 are allowed over the prior art of record (if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as set forth in this Office action above. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record (most comprehensive prior art of record to Jiang et al.,) suggests an illumination system, comprising: (i) a first electric appliance driver, (ii) a second electric appliance driver comprising: a control signal generation module, and (iii) a plurality of illumination units; and wherein the second electric appliance driver is configured to have an input end electrically connected to, and powered by, an output end of the first electric appliance driver, and is electrically connected to and configured to drive at least one of the canless light or a night light illumination unit of the plurality of illumination units to achieve lighting and other additional functions. However, the prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious to one ordinary skilled in the art the illumination system comprising the various elements as claimed above in combination with the specific limitation of the first electric appliance driver has a first end directly electrically connected to and configured to drive a canless light or a night light, and a second end configured to connect to an external power source as set forth in Claim 1. Claim(s) 2-12 are allowable because of their dependency status from Claim 1. Other Prior Art Cited The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Espacenet Patent Search Complete (Global Dossier) Examiner's Note The Examiner cites particular figures, paragraphs, columns and line numbers in the reference(s), as applied to the claims above. Although the particular citations are representative teachings and are applied to specific limitations within the claims, other passages, internally cited references, and figures may also apply. In preparing a response, it is respectfully requested that the Applicant fully consider the references, in their entirety, as potentially disclosing or teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as fully consider the context of the passage as taught by the reference(s) or as disclosed by the Examiner. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner H. Featherly whose telephone number is 571-272-8654. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9 AM-4 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached on 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-272-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /H. Featherly/ Examiner Featherly Art Unit 2875 Patent Examiner /JAMES R GREECE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 22, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 27, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 06, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 01, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595896
LUMINAIRE WITH A ROTATING PATTERN BEAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575274
ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING UNDER DISPLAY CAMERA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570209
TRANSPARENT LUMINESCENT SHEET AND A LAMP APPARATUS USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566289
BACKLIGHT DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563921
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 645 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month