Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/894,166

Cosmetics container

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 24, 2022
Examiner
BETIT, JACOB F
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Xiamen Bonmart Machinery And Plastic Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 11m
To Grant
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allow Rate
53 granted / 151 resolved
-34.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 151 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I in the reply filed on 10/24/24 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 2,10-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/24/24. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. [AltContent: textbox (Second through hole)][AltContent: textbox (Through hole at bottom of trough)]Claims 1,3,5,6,9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goncalves 5018894. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 588 854 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 1, Goncalves discloses a cosmetics container, comprising a container body 2, a rotatable cap 8, a dispenser 6, and a cover 36; the container body 2 is configured to accommodate cosmetics; one end of the container body is formed as a connecting portion 17; an end surface of the connecting portion is provided with a first through hole 22 configured to dispense the cosmetics; the rotatable cap 8 is fitted on the connecting portion 17 by rotary connection to define a sealed cavity between the rotatable cap 8 and the connecting portion 17 and in communication with both the rotatable cap and the connecting portion; the rotatable cap 8 is provided with a second through hole 27a in communication with the cavity; the dispenser 6 is mounted on the rotatable cap 8; the first through hole 22, the cavity, and the second through hole 27a define a cosmetics dispensing channel from the container body 2 to the dispenser 6; the cover 36 covers said end of the container body 2, and also houses the rotatable cap 8 and the dispenser 6; wherein a projection 7 which is integrally formed with the connecting portion 17 is provided inside the cavity; the projection opens or closes the cosmetics dispensing channel subject to rotation of the rotatable cap 8. With regard to claim 3, note that the projection 7 is provided at a center of the end surface of the connecting portion 17 (see above figs. 1 and 2); correspondingly, the second through hole 27a is configured at a center of the rotatable cap 8; also, the rotatable cap 8 and the connecting portion 17 are connected by threaded connection (see col. 5, lines 62-68 and col. 6, lines 1-6) ; the projection 7 opens or closes the second through hole 27a depending on the rotation of the rotatable cap 8 with respect to the connecting portion 17. With regard to claim 5, note that the end surface of the connecting portion 17 is recessed to form a trough 23; the projection 7 is positioned at a center of the trough 23; the first through hole 22 is provided at a bottom surface of the trough 23 (see above annotated figures); an end surface of the rotatable cap 8 facing towards the connecting portion 17 is provided with an annular flange 28; the flange 28 is slidable in an axial direction thereof on a wall of the trough when the rotatable cap 8 is rotated with respect to the connecting portion 17, and the flange 28 maintains a sealing effect against the wall of the trough 23 during sliding. With regard to claim 9, note that an end of the rotatable cap 8 facing towards the cover 36 is provided with a mounting cavity 35; the dispenser 6 is mounted in the mounting cavity. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Goncalves 5018894 in view of Pederson 1042032. With regard to claim 4, Goncalves does not disclose wherein one end of the second through hole facing towards the projection is shaped as a tapered hole; the tapered hole has an increasing diameter along a direction towards the projection; an end surface of the projection is provided with a platform corresponding to the tapered hole; when the cosmetics container is in a closed condition, the platform is fitted into the tapered hole. Pederson discloses a cosmetics container (see annotated fig. 3 below) wherein a tapered through hole 4 has an increasing diameter towards a projection 10 (see top portion of hole 4) and an end surface of the projection that has a platform corresponding to the tapered hole, to close the container. PNG media_image2.png 322 325 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to utilize the tapered through hole/projection with platform as the closing mechanism of the cosmetics container of Goncalves, as taught by Pederson, if one wished for an axial closing of the dispenser of Goncalves. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6,7,8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS D LUCCHESI whose telephone number is (571)272-4977. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 800-430. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacqueline Johanas can be reached on 571-270-5085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS D LUCCHESI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 10, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 9339688
CORE EXERCISE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 17, 2016
Patent 9043275
DATA SYNCHRONIZATION USING STRING MATCHING
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2015
Patent 9026539
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2015
Patent 9020954
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2015
Patent 8819054
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2014
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+16.3%)
4y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 151 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month