Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/894,245

AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 24, 2022
Priority
Feb 27, 2020 — JP 2020-032295 +1 more
Examiner
BARGERO, JOHN E
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
322 granted / 582 resolved
-14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
621
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
95.0%
+55.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/03/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant’s representative has provided a piecemeal argument as to why the teaching art, Khan et al. (US 2012/0292000), is not relevant; the Office respectfully disagrees. Khan shows in Figure 1, that air inlets or louvers (18) that are mounted on the perimeter of an air handling device which is what is claimed. Arguably this configuration could also be argued as a design choice which would allow the device to be installed next to a wall, while still allowing air flow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hancock (US 2004/0211553) and Khan et al. (US 2012/0292000). Regarding claim 1, Hancock (H) discloses an air conditioning system comprising: a burner unit (28, Figure 1) including a burner (48, [0027]) and a first casing (Lower portion below jog in Figure 1, directly below (54)) that houses the burner and has an air inlet (center of (12), [0027]); and a heat exchanger unit (16,[0026]) including a heat exchanger (40,42) through which a flammable refrigerant passes, a second casing that houses the heat exchanger (16, See figure 1, above furnace), and a connection portion connected to a refrigerant connection pipe extending from a heat source unit, wherein the first casing has a first surface, the second casing is disposed to overlap a part of the first surface (central portion of (16)), the first surface includes a first portion that overlaps the second casing and a second portion that does not overlap the second casing, the connection portion is disposed in the second casing to be projected onto the second portion of the first casing (transitional lip/flange between furnace and heat exchanger housing in Figure 1), but does not disclose that the air inlet is provided on a surface that is other than the second portion and is at least one of a plurality of surfaces adjacent to the first surface. However, Khan (K) disclose an HVAC system (Figure 1) with a heat exchanger wherein air inlet is provided on a surface that is other than the second portion and is at least one of a plurality of surfaces adjacent to the first surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to supply louvers through the sheet metal casing of a heat exchanger as an economical way of provided airflow to a heat exchanger. Regarding claim 2, Hancock (H), as modified, discloses the air conditioning system according to claim 1, wherein the air inlet is provided at a position closer to an end farther from the second casing than an end closer to the second casing on at least one of the plurality of surfaces adjacent to the first surface (Figure 1, arrows). Regarding claim 3, Hancock (H), as modified, discloses the air conditioning system according to claim 1, wherein the air inlet has a plurality of openings, and each of the plurality of openings has a slit shape extending in a direction away from the first surface (Figure 1, arrows). Regarding claim 4, Hancock (H), as modified, discloses the 4. The air conditioning system according to claim 1, wherein when a surface on which the connection portion is disposed is viewed as a front surface, the first casing further includes a second surface facing the first surface, a third surface located between the first surface and the second surface and defined as a front surface, and a fourth surface and a fifth surface adjacent to both the first surface and the third surface, and the air inlet is provided in at least one of the fourth surface or the fifth surface (Figure 1, arrows). Regarding claim 5, Hancock (H), as modified discloses the air conditioning system according to claim 1, wherein when a surface on which the connection portion is disposed is viewed as a front surface, the first casing further includes a second surface facing the first surface, a third surface located between the first surface and the second surface and defined as a front surface, and a fourth surface and a fifth surface adjacent to both the first surface and the third surface, and the air inlet is provided in the third surface and in the fourth surface or the fifth surface (Figure 1, arrows). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN E BARGERO whose telephone number is (571) 270-1770. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steve McAllister can be reached at (571) 272-6785. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN E BARGERO/Examiner, Art Unit 3762 /STEVEN B MCALLISTER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 24, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 03, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Interview Requested
May 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638191
CONSTANT-TEMPERATURE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM EMPLOYING CARBON DIOXIDE HEAT PUMP, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624771
STOP VALVE FOR INSTALLATION IN A PIPELINE, IN PARTICULAR IN A PIPELINE OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12595915
GAS VALVE AND OVEN
4y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594817
FLUID-HEATING DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR FOR A VEHICLE
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590710
LINKED HOT WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+30.8%)
3y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month