Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 17/895,456

MOTOR ASSEMBLY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 25, 2022
Priority
Mar 25, 2022 — CN 202210300811.8
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 187 resolved
-17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 187 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/18/2025, page 10, line 18, to page 12, line 5 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., that the circuit board should not be “exposed to the exterior of the space” (page 11, 2d para)) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Applicant seems to be implying that, as their disclosed circuit board is shown to be completely bound on three sides by the base and respective ring walls, such that the ring portion walls extend below the bottom of the circuit board, so should the claims be interpreted, but these relationships are not claimed. Claim language such as this, more specifically defining the vertical/axial relationship between the walls and the accommodating space, would overcome the rejection of record. Applicant argues that Lee and Hollenbeck do not disclose the feature “the second accommodation space is located between the outer ring portion and the inner ring portion for receiving the circuit board”. However, the space in Lee is “located between” the ring portions as broadly claimed, i.e. at least radially, or as viewed from above and below. The depicted space in the annotated Figures herein, copied from the previous Office Action, is radially entirely between the innermost portion of the inner ring (either bend portion 241 or merely the entire cylindrical portion, exclusive of the screw bosses) and the outer ring. Even to the extent that the depicted space is contiguous with the wall 24, as depicted adjacent the screw hole boss in Fig. 3, it is still “located between” that wall and the outer ring, as broadly claimed, and the circuit board is completely received within the depicted space, as claimed. Applicant argues that “The right side of the first circuit board 3 of Lee extends beyond the fourth wall of Lee 24, asserted to be the inner ring portion of the presently claimed invention by the Office Action, as shown in the red arrow of Fig. 4 of Lee” (page 11, 2d para). Firstly, the Office Action refers to the inner ring portion as “(24, generally)” and the inner ring is treated as including not only wall 24 but second inner ring wall/bend portion 241 and bottom wall/airtight gasket 26, both of which are completely radially interior of the depicted space. This relationship establishes the desired effect of waterproofing the space in which the circuit board is kept (see para [0037]), i.e. the circuit board of Lee is accommodated in a space that is necessarily ‘located between’ the gaskets 26 and 25, which are parts of the ring portions as broadly claimed. Secondly, to the extent that this argument may be referring to the vertical/axial portion of the circuit board of Lee that extends below the bottom of the wall 24, this vertical/axial relationship is not claimed, as discussed above, and further there is at least some partial overlap to support the interpretation of “located between” as broadly claimed. Thirdly, to the extent that this argument may be referring to the horizontal portion of the circuit board of Lee that extends to the right of the wall 24, as seen in Fig. 4, this appears to be the circumferential surface of the central hole; the figure does not appear to show any radial overlap (see annotated Fig. 4 below). (While Fig. 3 of Lee appears to show some interference between the wall and the circuit board, this appears impossible and is unexplained by the description and unresolved by the other figures. However, even if the circuit board does somehow interfere with the wall 24, the claimed accommodation space can be contiguous with the wall 24, as discussed above.) PNG media_image1.png 316 266 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 553 504 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 553 576 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 6, and 10-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20150340923) in view of Hollenbeck (US 6232687). Regarding Claim 1, Lee discloses (see figs. 3 and 4 below) a motor assembly (paragraph [0024]), comprising: a frame (depicted in Fig. 5) comprising a casing (depicted in Fig. 6) and a fixing portion (11), wherein the casing comprises a bottom portion (1), the fixing portion (11) is disposed on the bottom portion (1) (See paragraph [0026]); a rotor (5) comprising a hub (51), a first hollow portion (interior of hub 51), wherein the hub (51) comprises a top surface and a bottom surface opposite to each other, the first hollow portion is concavely formed from the bottom surface of the hub (51) toward the top surface (See Fig. 2, paragraph [0048]); a winding component (4) comprising a first end and a second end, wherein the first end of the winding component (4) is disposed in the first hollow portion of the rotor (5) (See Fig. 2, paragraph [0048]); a circuit board (3)(paragraph [0024]); and PNG media_image4.png 751 721 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 467 516 media_image5.png Greyscale a protection component (2) disposed between the winding component (4) and the bottom portion (1) of the casing (See Fig. 2) and comprising an inner ring portion (24, generally), an outer ring portion (22, generally) and a base (horizontal portion; See annotated Fig. 3 and 4, below; See also Fig. 5), wherein the inner ring portion (24) comprises a second hollow portion (see annotated fig. 3 below) and a first concave (See annotated Fig. 3 and 4, below), the second hollow portion is disposed in a center of the inner ring portion, the fixing portion (11) is penetrated through the second hollow portion and in the first hollow portion, the first concave is concavely formed on one side of the inner ring portion facing the hub (51), the outer ring portion comprises a second concave (see annotated fig. 3 below), the second concave (see annotated fig. 3 below) is concavely formed on one side of the outer ring portion back to the hub (51) (See annotated Fig. 3 and 4, below), the base (see annotated fig. 3 below) is connected with the inner ring portion and the outer ring portion, and the base is located between the circuit board (3) and the hub (51), the second end of the winding component (4) is disposed in the first concave, and the bottom portion (1) of the casing toward the hub (51) is at least partially received within the second concave (See Fig. 3,5, and 6, paragraph [0035]; at least the first wall (13) of the bottom portion (1) is received within the second concave), PNG media_image6.png 594 554 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 582 547 media_image7.png Greyscale wherein the base comprises a second accommodation space disposed on a lower surface thereof, and the circuit board is completely received within the second accommodation space (see annotated Fig. 3, below), the second accommodation space is located between the outer ring portion (22, generally) and the inner ring portion (24, generally) for receiving the circuit board. (See annotated Fig. 3, below; See also paragraph [0037]). PNG media_image8.png 594 554 media_image8.png Greyscale However, Lee does not specifically disclose a plurality of blades disposed around the hub. Lee does disclose a fan mounted to the hub (See paragraph [0024]). Hollenbeck teaches a similarly-arranged motor with a rotor hub 28 having fan blades 30 “formed integrally therewith and projecting radially from the hub. The hub 28 and fan blades 30 are formed as one piece of a polymeric material”. (See Col. 4, lines 21-24 and Fig. 3 of Hollenbeck) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the disclosed fan of Lee in the form of a plurality of blades disposed around a hub as in Hollenbeck. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to improve cooling efficiency and, as Hollenbeck teaches, in order to ensure that the blades are held securely on the hub (See Col. 8, lines 34-36). Regarding Claim 2, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 1. Lee further teaches (see figs. 3 and 4 above) the inner ring portion (24, generally) comprises a first inner ring wall (24), a second inner ring wall (241) and an inner ring bottom wall (26), wherein the first inner ring wall (24) is connected with the base and comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, the first end of the first inner ring wall (24) is protruded from an upper surface of the base, the second end of the first inner ring wall (24) is protruded from a lower surface of the base, and the first inner ring wall (24) is disposed between the second inner ring wall (241) and the base, wherein the second inner ring wall (241) comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, wherein the inner ring bottom wall (26) is connected between the second end of the first inner ring wall (24) and the second end of the second inner ring wall (241), wherein the first concave is collaboratively defined by the first inner ring wall (24), the second inner ring wall (241) and the inner ring bottom wall (26)(See Fig. 3, paragraph [0034]). Regarding Claim 3, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 2, and further wherein Lee further teaches (see figs. 3 and 4 above) a first length of the second inner ring wall (241) is less than a second length of the first inner ring wall (24), and a first distance formed between the first (upper) end of the first inner ring wall (24) and the inner ring bottom wall (26) is greater than a second distance formed between the first end of the second inner ring wall (241) and the inner ring bottom wall (26) (the second inner ring wall (241) and the inner ring bottom wall (26) are in contact, i.e. the second distance=0 See annotated Fig. 3 below, paragraph [0036]). PNG media_image9.png 588 733 media_image9.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 6, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 1, and further wherein Lee discloses the winding component (4) comprises a plurality of winding layers and a stator, the plurality of winding layers are disposed on the stator (See paragraph [0005]) , the stator comprises a first holder, a second holder and a core, the first holder and the second holder are disposed in two opposite sides of the stator, and the first holder is [closer] to the top surface of the hub (51) than the second holder. ((see annotated fig. 2, below)) PNG media_image10.png 517 533 media_image10.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 10, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the device of claim 1, Lee further teaches (see figs. 3 and 4 above) the base (see annotated fig. 3 below) comprises a first accommodation space (see annotated fig. 3 below) disposed on an upper surface thereof, wherein the first accommodation space is located between the outer ring portion (22, generally) and the inner ring portion (24, generally) and a second holder is partially received within the first accommodation space. (See annotated Fig. 3, below; See also paragraph [0037]) PNG media_image8.png 594 554 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 553 504 media_image11.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 11, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 1, and further wherein the motor assembly comprises Lee discloses a plurality of pins (43), the base comprises a plurality of first pin holes (291), the circuit board (3) comprises a plurality of second pin holes (unlabeled; See Fig. 3), the plurality of second pin holes are spatially corresponding in position to the plurality of first pin holes (291), and each one of the plurality of pins (43) is penetrated through corresponding one of the plurality of second pin holes and corresponding one of the plurality of first pin holes (291)(See Fig. 3, paragraph [0052]). Regarding Claim 12, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 1. Lee teaches the motor assembly comprises a plurality of connection wires (not shown; See paragraph [0046]). However, Lee does not disclose the protection component comprises a wire casing disposed on the outer ring portion for receiving the plurality of connection wires. Hollenbeck teaches a protection component (54) comprises a wire casing (78) disposed on the outer ring portion (See Fig. 14) for receiving the plurality of connection wires. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the plurality of connection wires of Lee with the wire casing disposed on the outer ring portion for receiving the plurality of connection wires similar to Hollenbeck. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to protect the connection wires and circuit boards from damage or disconnection due to environmental factors such as extreme temperature, as taught by Hollenbeck. (See Col. 6, lines 1-22) Regarding Claim 13, Lee discloses (see figs. 3 and 4 above) a motor assembly (paragraph [0024]), comprising: a frame (depicted in Fig. 5) comprising a casing (depicted in Fig. 6) and a fixing portion (11), wherein the casing comprises a bottom portion (1), the fixing portion (11) is disposed on the bottom portion (1)(See paragraph [0026]); a rotor (5) comprising a hub (51), a first hollow portion (interior of hub 51), wherein the hub (51) comprises a top surface and a bottom surface opposite to each other, the first hollow portion is concavely formed from the bottom surface of the hub (51) toward the top surface, (See Fig. 2, paragraph [0048]); a winding component (4) comprising a first end and a second end, wherein the first end of the winding component (4) is disposed in the first hollow portion of the rotor (5) (See Fig. 2, paragraph [0048]); a circuit board (3); and a protection component (2) disposed between the winding component (4) and the bottom portion (1) of the casing (See Fig. 2) and comprising an inner ring portion (24, generally), an outer ring portion (22, generally) and a base (horizontal portion; See annotated Fig. 3 and 4, above), wherein the inner ring portion (24) comprises a second hollow portion (see annotated fig. 3 above) and a first concave (see annotated fig. 3 above), the second hollow portion (see annotated fig. 3 above) is disposed in a center of the inner ring portion (24), the fixing portion (11) is penetrated through the second hollow portion and in the first hollow portion, the first concave is concavely formed on one side of the inner ring portion facing the hub (51), the base is connected with the inner ring portion and the outer ring portion, and the base is located between the circuit board (3) and the hub (51), and the second end of the winding component (4) is disposed in the first concave, wherein the base comprises an accommodation space disposed on a lower surface thereof, and the circuit board is completely received within the accommodation space (see annotated Fig. 3, below), the accommodation space is disposed between the outer ring portion and the inner ring portion for receiving the circuit board (3) (See Fig. 31). PNG media_image11.png 553 504 media_image11.png Greyscale However, Lee fails to specifically disclose a plurality of blades disposed around the hub. Lee does disclose a fan mounted to the hub (See paragraph [0024]). Hollenbeck teaches a similarly-arranged motor with a rotor hub 28 having fan blades 30 “formed integrally therewith and projecting radially from the hub. The hub 28 and fan blades 30 are formed as one piece of a polymeric material”. (See Col. 4, lines 21-24 and Fig. 3 of Hollenbeck) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the disclosed fan of Lee in the form of blades disposed around a hub as in Hollenbeck. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to improve cooling efficiency and, as Hollenbeck teaches, in order to ensure that the blades are held securely on the hub (See Col. 8, lines 34-36). Regarding Claim 14, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 13, and further wherein Lee discloses the inner ring portion comprises a first inner ring wall (29), a second inner ring wall (24) and an inner ring bottom wall, wherein the first inner ring wall (29) is connected with the base and comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, the first end of the first inner ring wall (29) and an upper surface of the base are coplanar with each other, the second end of the first inner ring wall (29) is protruded from a lower surface of the base, and the first inner ring wall (29) is disposed between the second inner ring wall (24) and the base, wherein the second inner ring wall (24) comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, and the inner ring bottom wall is connected between the second end of the first inner ring wall (29) and the second end of the second inner ring wall (24), wherein the first concave is collaboratively defined by the first inner ring wall (29), the second inner ring wall (24) and the inner ring bottom wall (See annotated Fig. 3, below). PNG media_image12.png 594 554 media_image12.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 15, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 14. Lee discloses However, Lee does not specifically disclose a first length of the second inner ring wall (24) is greater than a second length of the first inner ring wall (29) or a first distance formed between the first end of the first inner ring wall (29) and the inner ring bottom wall is less than a second distance formed between the first end of the second inner ring wall (24) and the inner ring bottom wall. The second inner ring wall in Fig. 3 of Lee appears to be longer than the first inner ring wall. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the disclosed second inner ring wall of Lee longer than the first inner ring wall in accordance with the drawings of Lee, as a longer second inner ring wall would provide a larger space for connections within the first concave and a truncated first inner ring wall would allow space on the underside of the inner ring bottom wall for the adhesive retaining space 291. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Hollenbeck as applied to claim 6 above, and further in view of Yin (US 20150180290). Regarding Claim 7, Lee in view of Hollenbeck teaches the motor assembly according to claim 6. Lee further teaches the first holder comprises a first holder hollow portion (41), a plurality of first holder holes (See Fig. 11, at the ends of spaced compartments 42) and a first holder main body (flat portion), the first holder hollow portion (42) is disposed in a center of the first holder and runs through the first holder main body, the first holder hollow portion (42) is spatially corresponding in position to the fixing portion (11), the plurality of first holder holes are disposed around the first holder hollow portion (42) and run through the first holder main body However, Lee does not teach a plurality of first holder walls, wherein the plurality of first holder walls are extended from the first holder main body toward the second holder and spatially corresponding in position to the plurality of first holder holes, and each one of the plurality of first holder walls is disposed around corresponding one of the plurality of first holder holes. Yin teaches a stator with a first holder (13) and a second holder (12) wherein the first holder (13) comprises a first holder hollow portion (132), a plurality of first holder holes (See annotated Fig. 5, below), a plurality of first holder walls (See annotated Fig. 5, below) and a first holder main body (disc portion), and the first holder hollow portion (132) is disposed in a center of the first holder (13) and runs through the first holder main body, wherein the first holder hollow portion (132) is spatially corresponding in position to a fixing portion (22), the plurality of first holder holes are disposed around the first holder hollow portion (132) and run through the first holder main body, the plurality of first holder walls are extended from the first holder main body toward the second holder (12) and spatially corresponding in position to the plurality of first holder holes, and each one of the plurality of first holder walls is disposed around corresponding one of the plurality of first holder holes. PNG media_image13.png 710 472 media_image13.png Greyscale [Yin Fig. 5] It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the disclosed first and second holders of Lee with the structural holder walls, wherein the plurality of holder walls are extended from the holder main body toward the other holder and spatially corresponding in position to the plurality of holder holes, and each one of the plurality of holder walls is disposed around corresponding one of the plurality of holder holes as in Yin. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to clamp and position the stator core for a preferable performance in positioning of the core, as taught by Yin (See paragraph [0029]). Regarding Claim 8, Lee in view of Hollenbeck and further in view of Yin teaches the motor assembly according to claim 7. Yin teaches a first holder (13) and a second holder (12) (See Fig. 5) the second holder (12) comprises a second holder hollow portion (122), a plurality of second holder holes (similar construction to first holder), a plurality of second holder walls (similar construction to first holder) and a second holder main body (similar construction to first holder), the second holder hollow portion (122) is disposed in a center of the second holder (12) and runs through the second holder main body, wherein the second holder hollow portion (122) is spatially corresponding in position to a fixing portion (22), the plurality of second holder holes are disposed around the second holder hollow portion (122) and run through the second holder main body, the plurality of second holder walls are extended from the second holder main body toward the first holder (13) and spatially corresponding in position to the plurality of second holder holes, and each one of the plurality of second holder walls is disposed around the corresponding one of the plurality of second holder holes. (See annotated Fig. 5, above.) Regarding Claim 9, Lee in view of Hollenbeck and further in view of Yin teaches the device of claim 8. Yin teaches the core (11) is disposed between the first holder (13) and the second holder (12), the core (11) comprises a core hollow portion (111) and a plurality of core penetrating holes (See Fig. 5), and the core hollow portion (111) is disposed in a center of the core (11) and runs through the core (11), wherein the core hollow portion (111) is spatially corresponding in position to the fixing portion (22), the plurality of core penetrating holes, the plurality of first holder walls and the plurality of second holder walls are spatially corresponding in position to each other (See Fig. 5), and each one of the plurality of first holder walls and corresponding one of the plurality of second holder walls are received by corresponding one of the plurality of core penetrating holes, wherein the plurality of winding layers (912), the plurality of first holder holes and the plurality of second holder holes are spatially corresponding in position to each other (See Fig. 4), and each one of the plurality of winding layers (912) is penetrated through the corresponding one of the plurality of first holder holes and the corresponding one of the plurality of second holder holes and disposed in the corresponding one of the plurality of core penetrating holes (See Fig. 4), wherein the fixing portion (22), the second holder hollow portion (122), the core hollow portion (111) and the first holder hollow portion (132) are spatially corresponding in position to each other, and the fixing portion (22) is penetrated through the second holder hollow portion(122), the core hollow portion (111) and the first holder hollow portion (132).(See paragraph [0028], Fig. 4 and 5) PNG media_image14.png 550 533 media_image14.png Greyscale [Yin Fig. 4] Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 4, the prior art fails to teach, either alone or in combination, a motor assembly according to claim 1, wherein an outer ring portion comprises a first outer ring wall, a second outer ring wall and an outer ring bottom wall, wherein the first outer ring wall is connected with the base and comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, the first end of the first outer ring wall is protruded from a lower surface of the base, the second end of the first outer ring wall is protruded from an upper surface of the base (the second end of the first outer ring wall (23) of Lee does not protrude from an upper surface of the base(See Fig. 3), and the first outer ring wall is disposed between the second outer ring wall and the base, wherein the second outer ring wall comprises a first end and a second end opposite to each other, and the outer ring bottom wall is connected between the second end of the first outer ring wall and the second end of the second outer ring wall, wherein the second concave is collaboratively defined by the first outer ring wall, the second outer ring wall and the outer ring bottom wall. Regarding Claim 5, claim 5 depends from objected-to claim 4. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-6987336-B2 Streng discloses an outer rotor fan motor with a circuit board accommodating space; US-9676408-B2 Tominaga discloses a motor with a circuit board accommodating space bound on three sides by a base and inner and outer rings; DE-202011002408-U1 BEST discloses an outer rotor fan motor with a circuit board accommodating space. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
5y 6m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month