Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/896,331

CHANNEL STITCHING FOR CELLULAR BASED RADIO FREQUENCY SENSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 26, 2022
Examiner
PASCUAL PEGUERO, NATALI
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
332 granted / 387 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
404
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 387 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 17/896,331 filed on 08/26/2022 is presented for examination by the examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1, 7 and 14 are amended. Claims 1-31 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on October 16, 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see Remarks, filed on 10/16/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1-31 have been considered but are not persuasive because the arguments do not apply to the references as used in the current rejection. Examiner provides a new ground(s) of rejections to address Applicant’s arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Duan et al. (Pub. No. 2023/0370230 A1 hereinafter Duan) in view of NPL (“Characteristics template for NR RIT of “5G” (Release 15 and beyond”); 5D/980-E; 01/02/19), and further in view of Pakrooh et al. (Pub. No. 2025/0035770 A1 hereinafter Pakrooh). Regarding claim 1, Duan teaches “a method of determining range information using joint communication and sensing, comprising: receiving assistance data for joint communication and sensing operations,” as [(Para. 0131), At stage 1330, the network entity 600 sends a configuration message 1332 to the UE 500 with the determined signal configuration. For example, the network entity 600 may request a TRP to send the configuration message 1332, e.g., requesting a TRI5 of the network entity 600, or requesting a TRP external to the network entity 600, to send the configuration message 1332 to the UE 500. The network entity 600 may, for example, request the TRP to schedule PRS and the supplemental signal to be sent using the same antenna port.] “performing joint communication and sensing operations utilizing the first subcarrier spacing to receive communication symbols and the second subcarrier spacing to receive radio frequency sensing symbols;” [(Para. 0133 and 0138), Step 1352 of fig. 13 shows the joint communication of the PRS (interpreted as RF symbols) and the supplemental signal (interpreted as communication symbols) …. (Para. 0121), the PRS properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc… the supplemental signal properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc…. (Para. 0068), the sensor processor 234 may comprise, e.g., processors for RF (radio frequency) sensing (with one or more (cellular) wireless signals transmitted and reflection(s) used to identify, map, and/or track an object), and/or ultrasound, etc..]. However, Duan does not specifically disclose wherein the assistance data includes mixed numerology information indicating at least a first subcarrier spacing for a frequency range and one or more first symbols of a signal transmission slot and a second subcarrier spacing for the frequency range and a plurality of second symbols of the signal transmission slot, wherein the second subcarrier spacing is at least twice the first subcarrier spacing; performing one or more channel stitching operations based on the received radio frequency sensing symbols to produce a stitched sensing signal having a stitched bandwidth spanning a combination of bandwidths of the received radio frequency sensing symbols; and determining range information based at least in part on the one or more channel stitching operations. In an analogous art, NPL teaches “wherein the assistance data includes mixed numerology information indicating at least a first subcarrier spacing for a frequency range and one or more first symbols of a signal transmission slot and a second subcarrier spacing for the frequency range and a plurality of second symbols of the signal transmission slot, wherein the second subcarrier spacing is at least twice the first subcarrier spacing” as [(Page 10, Section 5.2.3.2.7.1), The frame structure related information is as follows: Frame length, sub-carrier spacing, and time slots: One radio frame of length 10 ms consisting of 10 subframes, each of length 1 ms. Each subframe consists of an OFDM sub-carrier spacing dependent number of slots. Each slot consists of 14 OFDM symbols (twelve OFDM symbols in case of extended cyclic prefix) 15 kHz SCS: 1 ms slot, 1 slot per sub-frame 30 kHz SCS: 0.5 ms slot, 2 slots per sub-frame 60 kHz SCS: 0.25 ms slot, 4 slots per sub-frame 120 kHz SCS: 0.125 ms slot, 8 slots per sub-frame 240 kHz SCS: 0.0625 ms slot (only used for synchronization, not for data)]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the technique of Duan with the modified system of NPL to provide time and frequency synchronization to the DL and UL frame structures in combination with the use of a cyclic prefix OFDM transmission in both UL(with or without transform precoding) and DL, provides robustness against intersymbol interference [NPL: Page 27]. However, the combination of Duan and NPL does not specifically disclose performing one or more channel stitching operations based on the received radio frequency sensing symbols to produce a stitched sensing signal having a stitched bandwidth spanning a combination of bandwidths of the received radio frequency sensing symbols; and determining range information based at least in part on the one or more channel stitching operations. In an analogous art, Pakrooh teaches “performing one or more channel stitching operations based on the received radio frequency sensing symbols to produce a stitched sensing signal having a stitched bandwidth spanning a combination of bandwidths of the received radio frequency sensing symbols” as [(Para. 0068), FIG. 6 is a frequency diagram 600, illustrating how frequency stitching may be performed in UWB for RF sensing and/or ranging in UWB sessions. In this diagram 600, different RF signals used for RF sensing/ranging have different carrier frequencies (7 fc, 7.75 fc, etc.), which may represent different UWB channels. The RF signals further have respective bandwidths represented by blocks 620. In this example, the value of fc and the bandwidth are 499.2 MHZ, although embodiments may vary. Frequency domain stitching of sensing/ranging measurements across multiple carrier frequencies can be used in order to perform UWB ranging/sensing at artificially higher bandwidth. This can provide resolution for RF sensing/ranging due to the higher bandwidth of the sensing waveform, and ultimately higher accuracy for sensing/ranging] “and determining range information based at least in part on the one or more channel stitching operations” [(Para. 0068), FIG. 6 is a frequency diagram 600, illustrating how frequency stitching may be performed in UWB for RF sensing and/or ranging in UWB sessions.]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the technique of Duan and NPL with the modified system of Pakrooh to provide frequency domain stitching of multiple RF signals to effectively increase the bandwidth of UWB signals for positioning/sensing [Pakrooh: Para. 0031]. Regarding claim 2, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information, and performing the joint communication and sensing operations includes receiving radio frequency sensing symbols from a plurality of stations based at least in part on the intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information” as [(Para. 0121), The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis. An indication that a frequency band combination is supported for stitching indicates that the UE 500 would allow cross-band stitching (e.g., of PRS and SSB). For an indication in the field 1110 that stitching is not supported for the corresponding frequency band/band combination, the remaining fields of the report 1100 may be filled with null values. The PRS properties field 1130 may indicate one or more properties for the PRS to have in order for the combined processing unit 550 to be capable of processing the PRS in combination with the supplemental signal. For example, the PRS properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc. The PRS properties may include a PRS type, e.g., DL-PRS, SL-PRS, UL-PRS, which may imply one or more other properties.]. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein an intra-symbol multiplexing configuration is a comb based configuration” as [(Para. 0121), For example, the stitching capability field 1110 may indicate whether the UE 500 is able to stitch PRS and a supplemental signal for the corresponding frequency band or frequency band combination indicated in the field 1120, at least while providing the indicated accuracy(ies) (discussed below). The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis.]. Regarding claim 4, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes tuning gap information, and performing the joint communication and sensing operations includes receiving radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the tuning gap information” as [(Para. 0121), The maximum frequency separation field 1 165 may indicate a maximum frequency gap (e.g., maximum number of sub-bands) between a bandwidth of the PRS and a bandwidth of the supplemental signal (e.g., an instance of the supplemental signal nearest in frequency to the PRS).]. Regarding claim 5, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the radio frequency sensing symbols are positioning reference signals” as [(Para. 0133), Step 1352 of Fig. 13 illustrates the join communication of the PRS signals]. Regarding claim 6, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “further comprising transmitting one or more reports including the range information” as [(Para. 0135), At stage 1370, the UE 500 may send position information to the network entity 600 in a position information message 1372.]. Regarding claim 7, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Regarding claim 8, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the mobile device is configured to receive signals based on a first bandwidth and transmitting the symbols for the joint communication and sensing operations utilizes a second bandwidth that is larger than the first bandwidth” as [(Para. 0134), By processing the PRS and the supplemental signal in combination, a larger bandwidth of signal is processed than processing the PRS alone]. Regarding claim 9, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information, and transmitting the symbols for the joint communication and sensing operations includes transmitting radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information” as [(Para. 0121), The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis. An indication that a frequency band combination is supported for stitching indicates that the UE 500 would allow cross-band stitching (e.g., of PRS and SSB). For an indication in the field 1110 that stitching is not supported for the corresponding frequency band/band combination, the remaining fields of the report 1100 may be filled with null values. The PRS properties field 1130 may indicate one or more properties for the PRS to have in order for the combined processing unit 550 to be capable of processing the PRS in combination with the supplemental signal. For example, the PRS properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc. The PRS properties may include a PRS type, e.g., DL-PRS, SL-PRS, UL-PRS, which may imply one or more other properties]. Regarding claim 10, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein an intra-symbol multiplexing configuration is a comb based configuration” as [(Para. 0121), For example, the stitching capability field 1110 may indicate whether the UE 500 is able to stitch PRS and a supplemental signal for the corresponding frequency band or frequency band combination indicated in the field 1120, at least while providing the indicated accuracy(ies) (discussed below). The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis.]. Regarding claim 11, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes tuning gap information, and transmitting the symbols for the joint communication and sensing operations includes transmitting radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the tuning gap information” as [(Para. 0121), The maximum frequency separation field 1 165 may indicate a maximum frequency gap (e.g., maximum number of sub-bands) between a bandwidth of the PRS and a bandwidth of the supplemental signal (e.g., an instance of the supplemental signal nearest in frequency to the PRS).]. Regarding claim 12, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the radio frequency sensing symbols are positioning reference signals” as [(Para. 0133), Step 1352 of Fig. 13 illustrates the join communication of the PRS signals]. Regarding claim 13, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “further comprising providing the range information to a server” as [(Para. 0134), The processor 510 may use one or more measurements to determine other position information]. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Regarding claim 15, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information, and the at least one processor is further configured to receive radio frequency sensing symbols from a plurality of stations based at least in part on the intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information” as [(Para. 0121), The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis. An indication that a frequency band combination is supported for stitching indicates that the UE 500 would allow cross-band stitching (e.g., of PRS and SSB). For an indication in the field 1110 that stitching is not supported for the corresponding frequency band/band combination, the remaining fields of the report 1100 may be filled with null values. The PRS properties field 1130 may indicate one or more properties for the PRS to have in order for the combined processing unit 550 to be capable of processing the PRS in combination with the supplemental signal. For example, the PRS properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc. The PRS properties may include a PRS type, e.g., DL-PRS, SL-PRS, UL-PRS, which may imply one or more other properties]. Regarding claim 16, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein an intra-symbol multiplexing configuration is a comb based configuration” as [(Para. 0121), For example, the stitching capability field 1110 may indicate whether the UE 500 is able to stitch PRS and a supplemental signal for the corresponding frequency band or frequency band combination indicated in the field 1120, at least while providing the indicated accuracy(ies) (discussed below). The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis.]. Regarding claim 17, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes tuning gap information, and the at least one processor is further configured to receive radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the tuning gap information” as [(Para. 0121), The maximum frequency separation field 1 165 may indicate a maximum frequency gap (e.g., maximum number of sub-bands) between a bandwidth of the PRS and a bandwidth of the supplemental signal (e.g., an instance of the supplemental signal nearest in frequency to the PRS).]. Regarding claim 18, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the mixed numerology information further includes a third subcarrier spacing, and the at least one processor is further configured to receive synchronization signal symbols based on the third subcarrier spacing” as [(Para. 0131), At stage 1330, the network entity 600 sends a configuration message 1332 to the UE 500 with the determined signal configuration. For example, the network entity 600 may request a TRP to send the configuration message 1332, e.g., requesting a TRI5 of the network entity 600, or requesting a TRP external to the network entity 600, to send the configuration message 1332 to the UE 500. The network entity 600 may, for example, request the TRP to schedule PRS and the supplemental signal to be sent using the same antenna port.]. Regarding claim 19, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the radio frequency sensing symbols are positioning reference signals” as [(Para. 0133), Step 1352 of Fig. 13 illustrates the join communication of the PRS signals]. Regarding claim 20, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine timing information for the radio frequency sensing symbols received via a line of sight path and at least one non-line of sight path” as [(Para. 0099), In some instances, additional information may be obtained in the form of an angle of arrival (AoA) or angle of departure (AoD) that, defines a straight-line direction (e.g., which may be in a horizontal plane or in three dimensions) or possibly a range of directions (e.g., for the LIE from the locations of base stations). The intersection of two directions can provide another estimate of the location for the UE.]. Regarding claim 21, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the at least one processor is further configured to transmit one or more reports including the range information” as [(Para. 0135), At stage 1370, the UE 500 may send position information to the network entity 600 in a position information message 1372.]. Regarding claim 22, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data is received via radio resource control messaging, downlink control information messaging, medium access control messaging, or any combination thereof” as [(Para. 0055), The UE 105 may communicate with the CU 113 via RRC]. Regarding claim 23, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Regarding claim 24, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the mobile device is configured to receive signals based on a first bandwidth and the symbols transmitted for the joint communication and sensing operations utilize a second bandwidth that is larger than the first bandwidth” as [(Para. 0134), By processing the PRS and the supplemental signal in combination, a larger bandwidth of signal is processed than processing the PRS alone]. Regarding claim 25, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information, and the at least one processor is further configured to transmit radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the intra-symbol multiplexing configuration information” as [(Para. 0121), The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis. An indication that a frequency band combination is supported for stitching indicates that the UE 500 would allow cross-band stitching (e.g., of PRS and SSB). For an indication in the field 1110 that stitching is not supported for the corresponding frequency band/band combination, the remaining fields of the report 1100 may be filled with null values. The PRS properties field 1130 may indicate one or more properties for the PRS to have in order for the combined processing unit 550 to be capable of processing the PRS in combination with the supplemental signal. For example, the PRS properties may include frequency layer, comb number, numerology (e.g., subcarrier spacing (SCS)), etc. The PRS properties may include a PRS type, e.g., DL-PRS, SL-PRS, UL-PRS, which may imply one or more other properties]. Regarding claim 26, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein an intra-symbol multiplexing configuration is a comb based configuration” as [(Para. 0121), For example, the stitching capability field 1110 may indicate whether the UE 500 is able to stitch PRS and a supplemental signal for the corresponding frequency band or frequency band combination indicated in the field 1120, at least while providing the indicated accuracy(ies) (discussed below). The combined processing unit 550 may thus indicate the capability of the UE 500 to process PRS and a supplemental signal in combination on a per frequency band and/or per frequency band combination basis.]. Regarding claim 27, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the assistance data includes tuning gap information, and the at least one processor is further configured to transmit radio frequency sensing symbols based at least in part on the tuning gap information” as [(Para. 0121), The maximum frequency separation field 1 165 may indicate a maximum frequency gap (e.g., maximum number of sub-bands) between a bandwidth of the PRS and a bandwidth of the supplemental signal (e.g., an instance of the supplemental signal nearest in frequency to the PRS).]. Regarding claim 28, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the at least one processor is further configured to receive timing information associated with the radio frequency sensing symbols received by the mobile device via a line of sight path and at least one non-line of sight path” as [(Para. 0099), In some instances, additional information may be obtained in the form of an angle of arrival (AoA) or angle of departure (AoD) that, defines a straight-line direction (e.g., which may be in a horizontal plane or in three dimensions) or possibly a range of directions (e.g., for the LIE from the locations of base stations). The intersection of two directions can provide another estimate of the location for the UE.]. Regarding claim 29, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the at least one processor is further configured to provide the range information to a server” as [(Para. 0134), The processor 510 may use one or more measurements to determine other position information]. Regarding claim 30, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein the at least one processor is further configured to provide the assistance data via radio resource control messaging, downlink control information messaging, medium access control messaging, or any combination thereof” as [(Para. 0055), The UE 105 may communicate with the CU 113 via RRC]. Regarding claim 31, the combination of Duan, NPL and Pakrooh, specifically Duan teaches “wherein to perform one or more channel stitching operations based on the received radio frequency sensing symbols the at least one processor is configured to perform the one or more channel stitching operations based only on the received radio frequency sensing symbols” as [(Para. 0134), At stage 1360, the UE 500 determines a positioning signal measurement. For example, the processor 510 may process the PRS and the supplemental signal in combination (interpreted as channel stitching) … (Para. 0121), The supplemental signal type field 1140 may be omitted, or the supplemental signal properties field 1145 may be omitted if the supplemental signal type field 1140 is included and a value of the supplemental signal type field 1140 implies the corresponding properties.]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATALI N PASCUAL PEGUERO whose telephone number is (571)272-4691. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11AM-9PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ASAD M NAWAZ can be reached at (571)272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATALI PASCUAL PEGUERO/Examiner, Art Unit 2463 /ASAD M NAWAZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 02, 2025
Interview Requested
May 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 13, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 10, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604325
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LOCATION AND TIMING FOR GROUP-COMMON DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12556448
OPTIMIZED RECONFIGURATION OF RLM AND BEAM MONITORING PARAMETERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12531777
OPTIMIZATION OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN NETWORK DEVICES USING WIRELESS REDUNDANCY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12526187
DETERMINING CELL UPGRADE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12512881
2X LTF SEQUENCE FOR 320 MHZ
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 387 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month