Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/896,764

CATALYTIC METAMATERIAL ABSORBER-EMITTER, DEVICES AND METHODS OF FABRICATION AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 26, 2022
Examiner
PARBADIA, BALRAM T
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
391 granted / 525 resolved
+6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
558
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 525 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/29/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrases “(thickness >0.5 mm, material)”, “element(s) has(have) a defined geometric construct(s)”, and “(impedance matching)” render the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations within the parentheticals are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim 9, the phrase “a specific wavelength(s)” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation within the parentheticals are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim 14, the phrase “(Z scheme)” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation within the parentheticals are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim 16, the phrases “(clusters per unit volume)”, and “(impedance matching)” render the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations within the parentheticals are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 2-15 are dependent on claim 1, and therefore inherit at least the same deficiencies as claim 1. Claims 12-14 are dependent on claim 9, and therefore inherit at least the same deficiencies as claim 9. Claims 17-26 are dependent on claim 16, and therefore inherit at least the same deficiencies as claim 16. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Soci (10,151,858), Juluri (2016/0160364), Araci (2012/0235067), and Norris (2012/0161600) disclose relevant catalytic metamaterial devices, but fail to provide teachings in a manner that would be appropriate under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BALRAM T PARBADIA whose telephone number is (571)270-0602. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571) 272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BALRAM T PARBADIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 25, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601866
POLARIZING PLATE AND OPTICAL DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596228
MEMS-DRIVEN OPTICAL PACKAGE WITH MICRO-LED ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596209
LIGHT CONTROL FILM INCLUDING OPTICAL CAVITIES CONTAINING LIQUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588172
DISPLAY DEVICE AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578508
OPTICAL ARTICLE HAVING A MULTILAYERED ANTIREFLECTIVE COATING INCLUDING AN ENCAPSULATED METAL FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 525 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month