Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 17/898,413

CRANE CONSTRUCTION GRIPPING DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 29, 2022
Examiner
MARSH, STEVEN M
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1238 granted / 1560 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1594
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1560 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This is the second office action for US Application 17/898,413 for a Crane Construction Gripping Device and Communication Method Thereof. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Invention I in the reply filed on 31 December 2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the gripping device includes a sensor, and a first transceiver in communication with a second transceiver, and does not use a manual process. This is not found persuasive because the test is not whether the product uses a different process, but rather whether the product can be used in a different process. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 13-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 31 December 2025. Claim Objections Claims 1-12 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, line 4, the word “having” should be deleted and replaced with - - has - -. Claim 3, line 3, the word “having” should be deleted and replaced with - - has - -. Claim 6, line 3, the word - - is - - should be inserted between “cab” and “coupled”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-4, 8-10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the width of the grasping" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the transmitter" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the plurality of communication utilities" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the group" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the material" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the group" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2011/0191025 to Maynard US 2013/0103271 to Best US 2021/0354960 to Faloney, Jr. US 2011/0146114 to Hren US 2011/0204666 to Kjol US 4216868 to Geppert US 11951894 to Maki The above prior art discloses various cranes with gripping devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN M MARSH whose telephone number is (571)272-6819. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 9 am-7:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN M. MARSH Primary Examiner Art Unit 3632 /STEVEN M MARSH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 11, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 17, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598957
SUBSTRATE TRANSFER APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TRANSFER METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590602
TRIM ATTACHMENT ASSEMBLY FOR MOUNTING SOLAR PANEL EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588789
System, Apparatus and Method for Toiletry Convenience
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582253
Self-Righting Hydration Cup Holder
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584513
SUCKER STRUCTURE AND A FENCE HEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month