Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/899,820

ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY FILTER OF A WIND POWER INSTALLATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 31, 2022
Priority
Aug 31, 2021 — EU 21194135.6
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wobben Properties GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1008 granted / 1234 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1294
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
82.5%
+42.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1234 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 3, Claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 1/5/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yasuda et al. [US 2013/0169048 A1] in view of Hendrik [EP 2290834 A1]. Regarding claims 1-2, Yasuda et al. discloses a filter arrangement for a converter module [figures 2-5B], comprising: - a magnetic core [50, figure 3], wherein the magnetic core is ring-shaped or tubular, has an opening, and wherein the magnetic core is configured to: receive, through the opening [figures 2A-2B, 5A-5B], at least a first phase of the converter module and a first conductor of a DC voltage for the converter module, and form a choke for the converter module and a choke for the DC voltage [figures 5A-5B]. Yasuda et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific of the magnetic core. Hendrik discloses a toroid/ring core for a filter [112], wherein the toroid core formed of ferromagnetic material such as Mn-Zn or Ni-Zn [para 0030] for a power converter. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use ferromagnetic material for the magnetic core of Yasuda et al., as suggested by Hendrik, for the purpose of providing high permeability to boost inductance while reducing energy loss. The intended use of the power converter in a wind power installation would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of intended use. Regarding claim 3, Yasuda et al. discloses the use of the filter in a multi-phase power converter system [figures 2A-2B, 5A-5B] with multiple lines/conductors [22, 26] forming different devices for the system. Regarding claim 4, the specific “combination cores” for the ring core would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose facilitating different magnetic flux/field. Regarding claim 5, Hendrik uses ferromagnetic material having permeability of 1000 or more and inductance value between 1µH and 100µH. The combination of Yasuda et al. and Hendrik with exhibit the inductance and permeability, as claimed. Regarding claims 6-7, Yasuda et al. further discloses capacitors [34, 38, 40] connected to the filter. This structure would exhibit the functional, as claimed. Regarding claim 8, the specific use of the filter [EMC] or configure to filter in different applications [note Yasuda discloses in figure 1, the target frequency configuration] would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose facilitating filtering. Regarding claims 9-10, the specific using the filter in a highly rate power converter would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of intended use. Regarding claims 11-12, Yasuda et al. in combination of Hendrik structure could be installed in a cabinet of any device [dimensionally fit]. The specific arrangement would and/or connection/operation would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of facilitating manufacturing/assembling and operation. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Steffan et al. [DE 102019130838 A1] in view of Hendrik [EP 2290834 A1]. Regarding claims 1-2, Steffan et al. discloses a filter arrangement for a converter module [figures 1-4, abstract], comprising: - a magnetic core [figures 1-6], has an opening, and wherein the magnetic core is configured to: receive, through the opening [figures 5-6], at least a first phase of the converter module and a first conductor of a DC voltage for the converter module, and form a choke for the converter module and a choke for the DC voltage [figures 1-4] Steffan et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the specific of the magnetic core. Hendrik discloses a toroid/ring core for a filter [112], wherein the toroid core formed of ferromagnetic material such as Mn-Zn or Ni-Zn [para 0030] for a power converter. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to use ferromagnetic material for the magnetic core of Steffan et al., as suggested by Hendrik, for the purpose of providing high permeability to boost inductance while reducing energy loss. Steffan et al. further discloses the use of the filter in a wind turbine [wind power installation]. Regarding claim 3, Steffan et al. discloses the use of the filter in a multi-phase power converter system [abstract] with multiple lines/conductors [figures 2-4] forming different devices for the system. Regarding claim 4, Steffan et al. the magnetic core includes a combination of cores or multiple core elements [figures 5-6]. Regarding claim 5, Hendrik uses ferromagnetic material having permeability of 1000 or more and inductance value between 1µH and 100µH. The combination of Yasuda et al. and Hendrik with exhibit the inductance and permeability, as claimed. Regarding claims 6-7, Steffan et al. further discloses capacitors [C26-28, C36-38, C46-48 of figures 2-4]] connected to the filter. This structure would exhibit the functional, as claimed. Regarding claim 8, the specific use of the filter [as EMI filter] would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of improving electromagnetic filtering. Regarding claims 9-10, the specific using the filter in a highly rate power converter would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of intended use, note Steffan’s arranged is used in a wind turbine [high power system]. Regarding claims 11-12, Steffan et al. in combination of Hendrik structure could be installed in a cabinet of any device [dimensionally fit]. The specific arrangement would and/or connection/operation would have been an obvious design consideration for the purpose of facilitating manufacturing/assembling and operation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 31, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633447
COIL MODULE
4y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633448
COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COIL COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626857
A TRANSFORMER ARRANGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620519
MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620522
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1234 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month