Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/901,431

PREPARATION METHOD, PRODUCT, AND APPLICATION OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA REFERENCE SAMPLES

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 01, 2022
Examiner
GOLDBERG, JEANINE ANNE
Art Unit
1682
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Seekin Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allow Rate
372 granted / 811 resolved
-14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
878
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§103
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 811 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the papers filed July 16, 2025. Currently, claims 1-9, 11-17, 19, 25, 27-28 are pending. Claims 11-17, 19, 25, 27-28 have been withdrawn as drawn to non-elected subject matter. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of Group I, Claims 1-9 in the paper filed July 16, 2025 is acknowledged. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority This application claims priority to CHINA 202111029341.8, filed September 1, 2021. It is noted that a translation of the foreign document has not been received. Drawings The drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Han et al. (BBA General Subjects, Vol. 1863, 1235-1242, 2019). Han teaches culturing tumor cells MCF7 (mammary adenocarcinoma), SW480 and SW620 (colorectal adenocarcinoma cells) with CPT (camptothecin), an apoptosis inducer. The apoptosis inducer CPT was cultured with the tumor cells at 10M for 24 or 48 hours (limitations of Claims 8-9). Han teaches extracellular DNA released by cells can be detected in vitro cell culture medium (page 1237, col. 2). Han teaches Han also teaches cells were collected at three different time points (page 1236, col. 1). Supplementary Figure 1C illustrates cellular DNA for the different cells with CPT at the 5, 24 and 48 time points (limitations of Claim 4-5). Camptothecin is an apoptosis inducer that binds to topoisomerase-DNA complex and causes DN double strand break (limitations of Claims 2-3, 7). PNG media_image1.png 222 526 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1-3, 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Marques et al. (European J. of Cancer, Vol. 127, pages 130-138, January 31, 2020). Marques teaches induction of apoptosis increased sensitivity to detect cancer mutations in plasma. Specifically, Marques teaches doxetaxel was cultured with lung cancer cells and xenografted mice (abstract). Marques teaches performing ctDNA analysis following the treatment. Increasing docetaxel concentrations were used, including 10uM (page 131, col. 2). Marques teaches ctDNA was assessed both in vitro and in vivo (page 132, col. 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (BBA General Subjects, Vol. 1863, 1235-1242, 2019) in view of Yang et al. (J. of Cellular and molecular Medicine, Vol. 25, pages 801-812, December 1, 2020). Han teaches culturing tumor cells MCF7 (mammary adenocarcinoma), SW480 and SW620 (colorectal adenocarcinoma cells) with CPT (camptothecin), an apoptosis inducer. The apoptosis inducer CPT was cultured with the tumor cells at 10M for 24 or 48 hours (limitations of Claims 8-9). Han teaches extracellular DNA released by cells can be detected in vitro cell culture medium (page 1237, col. 2). Han teaches Han also teaches cells were collected at three different time points (page 1236, col. 1). Supplementary Figure 1C illustrates cellular DNA for the different cells with CPT at the 5, 24 and 48 time points (limitations of Claim 4-5). Camptothecin is an apoptosis inducer that binds to topoisomerase-DNA complex and causes DN double strand break (limitations of Claims 2-3, 7). PNG media_image1.png 222 526 media_image1.png Greyscale Han does not teach the apoptosis inducer is gracillin. However, Yang teaches gracillian shows potent efficacy against colorectal cancer and stimulates apoptosis in human CRC cells. Gracillin significantly reduces viability and migration and stimulates apoptosis in human CRC cells (abstract). Yang teaches SW480 cells were used and apoptosis was induced by gracillian. Yang teaches 10uM of gracillian induces apoptosis of SW480 cells (Figure 1 c). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substituted the apoptosis inducer CPT in the method of Han with the apoptosis inducer gracillin. The ordinary artisan would have appreciated gracillian and CPT were both apoptosis inhibitors and could have been substituted one for another and the results of the substitution would have been predictable. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to replace the CPT apoptosis inducer with another apoptosis inducer, namely gracillian, because one of ordinary skill in the art would have been able to carry out such a substitution, and the results were reasonably predictable. Conclusion No claims allowable over the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEANINE ANNE GOLDBERG whose telephone number is (571)272-0743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wu-Cheng Winston Shen can be reached on (571)272-3157. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEANINE A GOLDBERG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1682 August 12, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 01, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601012
COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING PATHOGENS, AND KIT AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601011
DETECTING GASTRIC NEOPLASM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601015
ALLELE, MOLECULAR MARKER, AND PRIMER PAIR OF RICE HPS1 GENE, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584179
DNA Methylation and Mutational Analysis Methods for Bladder Cancer Surveillance
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582625
METHODS FOR TREATING NEUROBLASTOMA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+40.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 811 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month