Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/903,592

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING MULTICAST GROUP PAGING FOR MBS MULTICAST SESSION ACTIVATION NOTIFICATION

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 06, 2022
Examiner
PANNELL, MARK G
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
298 granted / 405 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
430
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 405 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks The present Office Action is in response to Applicant’s amendment filed on 11/26/2025. Claims 1-3, 18, 21, and 25-27 remain pending in the present application. This Action is made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-3, 18, 21, and 25-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claims 1 and 18, the limitations, "in case that the first message includes second information on a UE paging list, transmitting a paging message for the multicast group paging of an MBS session corresponding to the MBS session ID in paging occasions identified based on the second information; and in case that the first message does not include the second information, transmitting the paging message in all paging occasions for the multicast group paging", introduce new matter because the specification of the present application fails to disclose, suggest, or otherwise support this limitation. The cited portions of Applicant’s specification specifically do not disclose or provide support for a choice between which paging occasions are used depending on a case that the first message includes second information on a UE paging list or a case that the first message does not include the second information. Furthermore, although paragraphs 0144 and 0145 discloses an approach where paging for the MBS multicast session activation notification uses in relevant POs for the UEs, the specification does not disclose the relevant UEs being determined from information received in a message. Therefore, Applicant’s specification also does not disclose or provide support for the paging occasions for the transmission of the paging message being based on the second information. Claims 2, 3, 21, and 25-27 are also rejected by virtue of their dependency on claims 1 and 18. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 18, 21, and 25-27 would be allowable if the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) are overcome. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Considering claims 1 and 18, the best prior art found during the prosecution of the present application, Gan et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0314523 A1) and Kim et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0104225 A1), fails to disclose, teach, or suggest the limitations of in case that the first message includes second information on a UE paging list, transmitting a paging message for the multicast group paging of an MBS session corresponding to the MBS session ID in paging occasions identified based on the second information; and in case that the first message does not include the second information, transmitting the paging message in all paging occasions for the multicast group paging in combination with and in the context of all of the other limitations in claims 1 and 18. Claims 2, 3, 21, and 25-27 are also allowed by virtue of their dependency on claims 1 and 18. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On pages 5-7 in the Remarks, Applicants maps wording of claim 1 to portions of Applicant’s specification. The cited portions of Applicant’s specification do not disclose or provide support for a choice between which paging occasions are used depending on a case that the first message includes second information on a UE paging list or a case that the first message does not include the second information. Furthermore, although paragraphs 0144 and 0145 discloses an approach where paging for the MBS multicast session activation notification uses in relevant POs for the UEs, the specification does not disclose the relevant UEs being determined from information received in a message. Therefore, Applicant’s specification also does not disclose or provide support for the paging occasions for the transmission of the paging message being based on the second information. Consequently, in view of the above reasons and having addressed each of Applicant’s arguments, the previous rejection is maintained and made FINAL by the Examiner. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office Action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to MARK G. PANNELL whose telephone number is (303) 297-4245. The Examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm (Mountain Time). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached on (571) 272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at (866) 217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call (800) 786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /Mark G. Pannell/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Aug 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598582
PAGING CONFIGURATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES, PAGING METHODS AND APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593309
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587999
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISTINGUISHING PAGING CAPABILITY OF BASE STATION, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580602
ACCESSORY SUPPORT DEVICES FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574732
PROVIDING LOCATION-BASED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES TO USERS SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 405 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month