Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/904,869

ADDITIVE FOR ELECTROLYTE OF SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY, ELECTROLYTE FOR SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY, AND SECONDARY LITHIUM BATTERY COMPRISING SAME

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Aug 23, 2022
Examiner
KLINE, SYDNEY LYNN
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Electronics
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
20 granted / 26 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
68
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 26 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted April 23, 2025 has been considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment In response to the amendment received on 11/26/2025: Claims 1-12 are pending in the current application. Claims 1, 4-5, and 8 have been amended. The objections to Claims 1, 4-5, and 8 have been overcome in light of the amendments. The cores of the previous prior art-based rejections have been overcome in light of the amendment. Response to Arguments The examiner finds the applicant’s arguments persuasive and has withdrawn the previous prior art-based rejections. Double Patenting Claims 1, 3, and 7 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,074,287. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,074,287 recites: [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 456 428 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 242 426 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 1, 3, and 7 of the instant application recite: PNG media_image3.png 84 587 media_image3.png Greyscale [AltContent: rect] PNG media_image4.png 397 609 media_image4.png Greyscale [AltContent: rect] PNG media_image5.png 559 620 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 223 619 media_image6.png Greyscale Claim 7 of the instant application recites an additional additive of LiBF4 and Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,074,287 recites an additional additive of LiBF4. Additionally, the formula in the instant application and the formula in U.S. Patent No. 12,074,287 substantially overlap when, in U.S. Patent No. 12,074,287, X is an R4—SO2 group, R4 is a substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C20 alkyl group or isocyanate group, and L is a substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C20 alkylene group or a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C20 alkenylene group, and are not patentably distinct from each other. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 contain allowable subject matter. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: none of the prior art of record, alone or in combination, appears to teach, suggest, or render obvious the invention of Claims 1-12. Independent Claims 1 and 3 disclose an additive for an electrolyte of a lithium secondary battery comprising a compound represented by the claimed Chemical Formula 1. Shigematsu et al. US-20130330610-A1 (“Shigematsu”) discloses an additive for an electrolyte of a lithium secondary battery comprising a compound that contains two isocyanate groups (NCO groups) and further comprising an additional isocyanate compound (see paragraphs [0002], [0026], and [0083]). Dijkhuzien GB-1139033-A (“Dijkhuzien”) discloses a diisocyanate compound containing an SO2 group (see image below) (see Page 1 Column 2 Lines 71-82 and Claim 3). PNG media_image7.png 37 260 media_image7.png Greyscale Figure 1. Diisocyanate compound disclosed by Dihkhuzien However, as applicant correctly and convincingly points out in arguments filed 11/26/2025, a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time when the present application was effectively filed would not have modified the additive of Shigematsu in such a way as to arrive at an additive that does not include the general formula (1) of Shigematsu and therefore would not have modified the electrolyte with the compound of Dijkhuzien. Thus, none of the prior art of the record, alone or in combination, appears to teach, suggest, or render obvious the invention of Claims 1-12. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYDNEY L KLINE whose telephone number is (703)756-1729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at 571-272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.L.K./ Examiner, Art Unit 1729 /ULA C RUDDOCK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 23, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Nov 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597643
LAMINATED ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597612
NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580240
Battery Pack for Exchangeable Insertion into a Receiving Compartment
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580190
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12548810
BATTERY, ELECTRIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR PREPARING BATTERY, AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.4%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 26 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month