Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/904,994

Method for synthesizing a fluorine-containing chiral amine compound

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 25, 2022
Priority
Feb 26, 2020 — CN 202010118880.8 +2 more
Examiner
HUTSON, RICHARD G
Art Unit
1652
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Asymchem Laboratories (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
581 granted / 893 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +53% interview lift
Without
With
+52.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
945
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/9/2026 has been entered. Applicant’s amendment of claims 1, 2 and 4, in the paper of 3/9/2026, is acknowledged. Applicants filing of a new sequence listing, on 3/18/2026, to correct the error in the sequence listing submitted on 3/9/2026 is acknowledged. It is noted that the sequence listing submitted on 3/18/2026 has been added to the file and overcame the issues with the previous sequence listing submission. Applicants' arguments filed on 3/9/2026 have been fully considered and are deemed to be persuasive to overcome some of the rejections previously applied. Rejections and/or objections not reiterated from previous office actions are hereby withdrawn. Claims 1-13 are still at issue and are present for examination. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of the species of the transaminase of SEQ ID NO:1 and the fluorine-containing dihydroxy ketal PNG media_image1.png 64 133 media_image1.png Greyscale , in the paper of 6/24/2025, is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-13 are directed to all possible methods for synthesizing a fluorine-containing chiral amine compound, wherein the method comprises: reacting an amino donor with a fluorine-containing dihydroxy ketal compound under a catalysis of a transaminase to generate the fluorine-containing chiral amine compound; wherein the transaminase is derived from: the transaminase has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2,SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO: 14, SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18,SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20, SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO:26, or SEQ ID NO: 27; the fluorine-containing dihydroxy ketal compound is selected from any one of the group consisting of: PNG media_image2.png 283 596 media_image2.png Greyscale The specification, however, only provides the representative species of those methods for synthesizing a fluorine-containing chiral amine compound, wherein the method comprises: reacting an amino donor with a fluorine-containing dihydroxy ketal compound under a catalysis of a transaminase to generate the fluorine-containing chiral amine compound; wherein the transaminase has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, SEQ ID NO:2,SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO:13, SEQ ID NO: 14, SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16, SEQ ID NO: 17, SEQ ID NO: 18,SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20, SEQ ID NO: 21, SEQ ID NO: 22, SEQ ID NO: 23, SEQ ID NO: 24, SEQ ID NO: 25, SEQ ID NO:26, or SEQ ID NO: 27; the fluorine-containing dihydroxy ketal compound is selected from any one of the group consisting of: PNG media_image2.png 283 596 media_image2.png Greyscale encompassed by these claims. There is insufficient disclosure of a particular structure to function/activity relationship in the disclosed species of transaminases and methods of use as it relates to the broader genus of “derived transaminases” and claimed methods of use. The molecular mechanism of the catalytic reaction as it relates to the transaminases and fluorine-containing compounds remains somewhat elusive (Xie et al., Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, Vol 12 p 7836-7843, 2019; cited in the IDS of 8/26/2022). The specification also fails to describe additional representative species of these derived transaminases having the required catalytic properties by any identifying structural characteristics or properties, for which no predictability of structure is apparent. Regarding the level of skill and knowledge in the art of amino acid substitutions, mutations or derivations, the reference of Singh et al. (Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 18:1-11, 2014; cited in the IDS of 8/26/2022) reviews various protein engineering methods and discloses that despite the availability of an ever-growing database of protein structures and highly sophisticated computational algorithms, protein engineering is still limited by the incomplete understanding of protein functions, folding, flexibility, and conformational changes (see p. 7, column 1, top). Also, the unpredictability associated with amino acid substitutions, mutations or derivations is exemplified by the reference of Zhang et al. (Structure 26:1474-1485, 2018; cited on the attached Form PTO-892), which discloses that even a mutation of a surface residue that was predicted to be benign caused significant structural changes and unexpected effects on the function of a polypeptide (p. 1475, column 1). Given this lack of additional representative species as encompassed by the claims, Applicants have failed to sufficiently describe the claimed invention, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms that a skilled artisan would recognize Applicants were in possession of the claimed invention. Applicant is referred to the revised guidelines concerning compliance with the written description requirement of U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, published in the Official Gazette and also available at www.uspto.gov. Closest Prior Art: CN 110592042 discloses preparation of a fluorine-containing chiral amine compound (description, paragraphs 8-80): transaminase catalyzes transamination reaction of a ketone compound and an amino donor; the transaminase is derived from a Chromobacterium violaceum mutant and has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1. CN 110592042 differs from the claimed methods because it discloses a different fluorine containing dihydroxy ketal compound, and a different resulting product. Remarks No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD G HUTSON whose telephone number is (571)272-0930. The examiner can normally be reached on 6-3 EST Mon-Fri. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Mondesi can be reached on (571) 272-0956. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. rgh 3/19/2026 /RICHARD G HUTSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 25, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 17, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624346
VACUUM DRYING METHOD FOR BOTULINUM TOXIN
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618097
Method for Determining Long Non-Coding Ribonucleic Acid Interaction Proteins
5y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618057
METHOD OF PURIFYING BOTULINUM TOXIN
4y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612604
High Throughput Reaction Assembly
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12584154
Template-Free Enzymatic Synthesis of Polynucleotides Using Poly(A) and Poly(U) Polymerases
4y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month