Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/907,414

USE OF CONJUGATES COMPRISING TUMOUR-SELECTIVE LIGANDS AND GROUPS CAPABLE OF RELEASING CARBON MONOXIDE (CO), FOR EXERTING IMMUNOMODULATORY EFFECTS IN CANCER TREATMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 27, 2022
Examiner
WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A
Art Unit
1692
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Faculdade De Medicina Da Universidade De Lisboa
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1403 granted / 1630 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -21% lift
Without
With
+-21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1666
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1630 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The examiner has considered the amendment and response filed November 26, 2025. Applicants amended claim 1 such that the tumor-selective ligand is a protein, since such a limitation in dependent claim was not rejected under prior art in the previous Office Action. However, the examiner has realized that this limitation should have been rejected, and as such, the following new rejections are being made. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5-7, 9, 24, 25, 34, 56, and 57 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kawahara et al. (Chemical Science, 2020). Kawahara et al. disclose the antigen-specific delivery of carbon monoxide to ovarian cancer cells (a carcinoma) by photoactivatable antibody-photoCORM conjugates. A manganese carbonyl compound is used as the photoCORM and conjugated to mouse monoclonal immunoglobulin G antibodies. Ovarian cancer is known to create a tumor microenvironment that suppresses the body’s immune response, is characterized by immune checkpoint protein (CLTA-4 and PD-1) mediated inhibition of T cell function. The reference does not expressly mention a method for reducing tumor immunosuppression; however, such a characteristic would be an inherent function of the photoCORM conjugates disclosed by Kawahara et al. when being delivered to ovarian cancer cells which are known to be a type of cancer that suppresses immune response. Therefore, the instant claims are anticipated by the disclosure of Kawahara et al. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11, 12, and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawahara et al. The instant claims further limit the method of the claimed invention, such that the carbon monoxide releasing group comprises a metal atom selected from ruthenium, molybdenum, cobalt rhenium, and iron; and to administering the carbon monoxide releasing group intravenously. Kawahara et al. do not teach the metals recited in the instant claims. The reference teaches a manganese carbonyl compound as the compound that releases carbon monoxide. However, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art that other transition metals could have been substituted for manganese to form a metal carbonyl compound that may have been used as a carbon monoxide releasing molecule (CORM). Like manganese, the metals recited in the instant claims are transition metals. With regard to the mode of administration of the carbon monoxide releasing group, the reference is silent; however, it would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to utilize the most effective administration route for delivering a substance to a subject in need thereof, for a treatment of a particular disease or disorder. Such a person would recognize intravenous, oral, subcutaneous administration, etc., as methods for administering a treatment, and would choose accordingly based on the route deemed most effective. Claims 2, 26, 31, 32, and 42-48 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIKARL A WITHERSPOON whose telephone number is (571)272-0649. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-9pm IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIKARL A WITHERSPOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2022
Application Filed
May 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599897
DIRECT CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF ALCOHOLS TO OLEFINS OF HIGHER CARBON NUMBER WITH REDUCED ETHYLENE PRODUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600690
METHOD OF ETHANOL CONVERSION TO HIGHER CARBON COMPOUNDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595219
CONTINUOS FLOW SYNTHESIS OF CANNABIDIOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595222
CURCUMINOIDS, ANALOGS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595221
HYDROFORMYLATION PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-21.0%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month