Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 17/907,712

Multi-Well Plates for Creation of High-Density Arrays of Compartmentalized Cell Cultures for Usage in High Capacity Applications

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 29, 2022
Priority
Apr 08, 2020 — EU 20168778.7 +1 more
Examiner
GIERE, REBECCA M
Art Unit
1677
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Cellectricon AB
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
382 granted / 518 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
545
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 518 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/06/2026 has been entered. Status of Claims Claims 27-50 are pending. Claim 27, 39 and 43 have been amended. Claims 27-50 are examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 27-50 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 27 is confusing because line 4 states said plate are in direct fluid connection through at least one closed microchannel, however claim 7 then goes on to recite “the at least one fluidic connection”. The “direct fluid connection” recitation at line 4 appears to be a description of the function of the closed microchannel and not a structural entity and thus there in no antecedent basis for “the at least one fluidic connection”. Claim 27 is also unclear because the claim states “one fluidic connection” and “one microchannel” and it is unclear if the microchannel is the same entity as the fluidic connection or if they are two separate structural components. Claim 27 is further unclear because the claim recites “one fluidic connection”, “a fluidic connection”, “the fluidic connection” and as these connections are not differentiated by their name, it is unclear which connection is intending to connect the various wells of the plate. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 07/06/2026 have been considered and appear to be persuasive, however the claims remain unpatentable based on the indefiniteness rejection described above. Applicants provide arguments such as “closed microchannel that traverses through the bottom of the adjacent well without fluidically opening to it” and recites portions of the claims such as “wherein a fluidic connection is formed between at least two non-adjacent wells and where the fluidic connection is traversing through the bottom of a well adjacent to at least one of the fluidically connected wells” – however, given the confusion described above, further clarity is needed within the claims to distinguish the various fluid connections vs closed microchannels and their relation to non-adjacent versus adjacent wells. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REBECCA M GIERE whose telephone number is (571)272-5084. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bao-Thuy L Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-0824. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REBECCA M GIERE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748107
IMMUNOASSAY DEVICE AND IMMUNOASSAY METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746542
LEUKOCYTE CONCENTRATION SEPARATION DEVICE, BLOOD COLLECTION CONTAINER, AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING LEUKOCYTES
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12730105
METHOD FOR DROPLET LOADING INTO NANOWELLS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12710418
Resonant nanophotonic biosensors
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704510
SIGNAL AMPLIFICATION IN PLASMONIC SPECIFIC-BINDING PARTNER ASSAYS
4y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month