Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/909,081

ADJUSTMENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 02, 2022
Examiner
RUSHING, JR, BOBBY
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mci (Mirror Controls International) Netherlands B V
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
368 granted / 487 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
512
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 487 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-8, 11-14, 19, 21 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Motomiya et al. (US 2019/0118716). Motomiya discloses and shows an adjustment device for adjusting the position of an adjustable element, the adjustable device comprising: a base frame (Figs. 1,3, item 36) for attachment to the adjustable element; an output shaft (24) rotatably coupled to the base frame; an electric motor (76) held by the base frame; and a worm gear assembly for transmitting rotation of the electric motor to the output shaft, wherein the worm gear assembly includes a first worm gear (54) and a corresponding first worm (52), wherein the output shaft (24) is provided with the first worm gear (54), wherein the first worm gear is coaxially disposed about a central axis of the output shaft, wherein the first worm gear is substantially rotationally coupled or fixed to the output shaft, wherein the first worm (52) is held in the base frame and is in engagement with the first worm gear, and wherein the adjustment device is arranged such that the base frame and the output shaft are rotatable with respect to each other over an angle of 120o (paras. 0019-0020). Claim 2 – the base frame and the output shaft are rotatable with respect to each other over an unlimited angle, i.e. over more than 360. Claim 3 – the output shaft (24) is provided with an output gear mount (cylindrical portion) which is arranged for mounting an output gear (58) to the output shaft. Claim 4 – the output shaft (24) is provided with an output gear (58). Claim 6 – the base frame (36) comprises a first base frame part (also 36), wherein the first base frame part comprises a first receiving opening (40) into which the output shaft has been inserted from a first side of the first base frame part, and wherein the first worm gear (54) has been mounted to the output shaft at a second, opposite side of the first base frame part. Claim 7 – the first worm gear (54) is mounted to the output shaft (24) has been locked to the output shaft such that the output shaft cannot be pulled out of the first worm gear (54). Claim 8 – the first worm gear (54) extends radially with respect to the output shaft (24), but not to an extent that the first worm gear cannot be pulled through the first receiving opening (40) from the second side towards the first side of the first base frame part. Claim 11 – said adjustment device further is arranged for suppressing play between the first worm gear and the first worm. Claim 12 – the first worm is biased in its axial direction. Claim 13 – the output shaft (24) is formed as a hollow shaft thereby providing a passage for cabling (para. 0019). Claim 14 – the base frame (36) is provided with one or multiple mounting holes (46) having an axial direction extending substantially transverse to the axial direction of the output shaft. Claim 19 – Motomiya discloses and shows a method for assembling an adjustment device comprising: providing at least a first base frame part (36) of the base frame, wherein said first base frame part is provided with a first receiving opening (40); providing the output shaft (24); inserting said output shaft from a first side (bottom) of the first base frame part through the first receiving opening; providing the first worm gear and mounting it onto the output shaft at a second side of the first base frame part opposite to the first side; and locking the first worm gear to the output shaft to such extent that the output shaft cannot be pulled out of the first worm gear in a direction opposite to the direction into which the output shaft has been inserted into the first receiving opening and into the first worm gear. Claim 21 – an intermediate part (47), which is provided between the first worm gear and the first base frame part, extend radially with respect to the output shaft to such extent that the first worm gear cannot be pulled through the first receiving opening from the second side towards the first side of the first base frame part. Claim 24 – adjustment device comprises a resilient element (64) biasing the first worm in its axial direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Motomiya et al., as applied to claim 1, in view of Mori et al. (US 4,982,926). Motomiya discloses and shows the invention of claim 1 as described elsewhere above. Motomiya does not include the first worm gear being rotationally coupled to the output shaft by a breakaway coupling which uncouples when a torque exceeds a predetermined torque. Mori teaches an adjustment device having a first gear (16) rotationally coupled to an output shaft by a breakaway coupling which uncouples when a torque exceeds a predetermined torque (col. 4:25-27). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Motomiya device to where the first worm gear is rotationally coupled to the output shaft by a breakaway coupling which also uncouples when a torque exceeds a predetermined torque as taught by Mori. Claim 22 – Motomiya does not disclose the predetermined torque (threshold value), however, the threshold value may be determined through the use of routine experimentation during the engineering design process to optimize the functionality of the device, suited to the intended use and desired parameters. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify Motomiya to include a threshold value to optimized the desired operational parameters through the use of routine experimentation. A person of ordinary skill in the art undertaking such experimentation would have had a reasonable expectation of success and the results would have been predictable. See also MPEP 2144.05(II)(A), which states, “[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation” in citing In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the rejected claims have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOBBY RUSHING, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-0501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at (571) 270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOBBY RUSHING, JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 02, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 07, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595840
Transmission for a Coaxial Two-Machine Electric Drive of a Motor Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588966
Robotic Surgical System With Illumination Device To Indicate Mounting Assembly Installation Condition
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590621
BELT TERMINATION AND TENSIONING IN A PULLEY ARRANGEMENT FOR A ROBOTIC ARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584543
CABLE ACTUATOR WITH IMPROVED COMPACTNESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584551
GEAR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 487 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month