Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/909,280

HARQ-ACK TRANSMISSION METHOD, USER EQUIPMENT AND STORAGE MEDIUM, AND HARQ-ACK RECEPTION METHOD AND BASE STATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 02, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, THINH D
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 5m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
330 granted / 532 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 532 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/16/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 12-15, 17-32 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 12-15, 18, 19, 21-24, 26-29, 32 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over R1-1912037 (“Other issues for URLLC and UE features”, VIVO) in view of R1-1912541 (“Discussion on DL SPS enhancements”, CMCC) and GAO et al. (US 20220399978 with foreign priority CN 201911089886.0 filed on 11/08/2019 and foreign priority CN 201911136319.6 filed on 11/19/2019). Regarding claim 12, R1-1912037 teaches a method performed by a user equipment (UE) (section 4.2, UE), the method comprising: receiving a time division duplex (TDD) uplink (UL)-downlink (DL) configuration and a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, reception of SPS and DL/UL TDD configuration); performing a SPS physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) reception based on the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS); determining a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource for multiplexing uplink control information (UCI) in a first slot, wherein the UCI includes hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) for the SPS PDSCH reception (fig. 7, section 4.2, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS…UE cancels the PUCCH transmission carrying the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH received in slot n (expect the PUCCH corresponding to the 1st PDSCH granted by the activation DCI, for which such conflict is considered as an error case)… If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n…UE needs to multiplex multiple HARQ-ACKs for the SPS PDSCHs in multiple PDSCH occasions. Therefore, a HARQ-ACK codebook is constructed in the available UL slot derived to contain the multiple HARQ-ACK where the available UL slot is indicated by semi-static TDD configuration); and transmitting the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception (fig. 7, section 4.2, determination of slot n for HARQ ACK), wherein, based on the first PUCCH resource satisfying conditions in the first slot, the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception is transmitted on a second PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If there is no available UL resource in slot n+K due to conflict TDD configuration…If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n), and wherein the conditions comprise: the first PUCCH resource overlaps with a symbol indicated as DL by the TDD UL-DL configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). However, R1-1912037 does not teach the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List. But, R1-1912541 in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List (section 2, The PUCCH resource for HARQ-ACK is configured via SPS-Config with n1PUCCH-AN). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1912541 in the system of R1-1912037 to signal PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to standardize to reduce the complexity of processing the SPS configuration. However, R1-1912037 does not teach there being no PUCCH transmission for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI). But, GAO et al. (US 20220399978) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches there being no PUCCH transmission for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI) (par. 164, supported by page 24 lines 1-6 of 201911136319.6), if DCI format 2-0 indicates that the flexible symbol is unavailable, the above-mentioned flexible symbol is included in the symbol set included in the PUCCH resource 1…then the HARQ-ACK feedback of the SPS PDSCH in the slot n is deferred). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by GAO in the system of R1-1912037 and R1-1912541 to indicate the available of PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to provide preempt collision. Regarding claim 13, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 14, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to SPS configurations for which corresponding HARQ-ACK information is transmitted on the first PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 15, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to a plurality of SPS configurations provided to the UE (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n; section 1, HARQ-ACK feedback for SPS PDSCHs without associated DL assignment shall be reported (i.e. no dynamic PDSCH HARQ-ACK), PUCCH resource i is selected if HARQ-ACK payload size (not including CRC) is in the range of {Ni,min, …, Ni,max} bits, where the number of PUCCH resources in the selection is from 0 up to 3). Regarding claim 18, R1-1912037 teaches a user equipment (UE) (section 4.2, UE) comprising: at least one transceiver (section 4.2, UE); at least one processor (section 4.2, UE); and at least one computer memory operably connectable to the at least one processor and storing instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to perform operations (section 4.2, UE) comprising: receiving a time division duplex (TDD) uplink (UL)-downlink (DL) configuration and a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, reception of SPS and DL/UL TDD configuration); performing SPS physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) reception based on the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS); determining, in a first slot, a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource for multiplexing uplink control information (UCI) in a first slot, wherein the UCI includes hybrid automatic repeat request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) for the SPS PDSCH reception (fig. 7, section 4.2, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS…UE cancels the PUCCH transmission carrying the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH received in slot n (expect the PUCCH corresponding to the 1st PDSCH granted by the activation DCI, for which such conflict is considered as an error case)… If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n…UE needs to multiplex multiple HARQ-ACKs for the SPS PDSCHs in multiple PDSCH occasions. Therefore, a HARQ-ACK codebook is constructed in the available UL slot derived to contain the multiple HARQ-ACK where the available UL slot is indicated by semi-static TDD configuration); and wherein, based on the first PUCCH resource satisfying conditions in the first slot, the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception is transmitted on a second PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If there is no available UL resource in slot n+K due to conflict TDD configuration…If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n), and wherein the conditions comprise: the first PUCCH resource overlaps with a symbol indicated as DL by the TDD UL-DL configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). However, R1-1912037 does not teach the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List. But, R1-1912541 in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List (section 2, The PUCCH resource for HARQ-ACK is configured via SPS-Config with n1PUCCH-AN). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1912541 in the system of R1-1912037 to signal PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to standardize to reduce the complexity of processing the SPS configuration. However, R1-1912037 does not teach there being no PUCCH transmission for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI). But, GAO et al. (US 20220399978) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches there being no PUCCH transmission for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI) (par. 164, supported by page 24 lines 1-6 of 201911136319.6), if DCI format 2-0 indicates that the flexible symbol is unavailable, the above-mentioned flexible symbol is included in the symbol set included in the PUCCH resource 1…then the HARQ-ACK feedback of the SPS PDSCH in the slot n is deferred). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by GAO in the system of R1-1912037 and R1-1912541 to indicate the available of PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to provide preempt collision. Regarding claim 19, R1-1912037 teaches performed by a base station (BS) (section 4.2, communication between cell and UE), the method comprising: transmitting a time division duplex (TDD) uplink (UL)-downlink (DL) configuration and a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration to a user equipment (UE) (fig. 7, section 4.2, reception of SPS and DL/UL TDD configuration); performing a SPS physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) transmission based on the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS); determining a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource for a reception of uplink control information (UCI) in a first slot, wherein the UCI includes hybrid automatic repeat _request-acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) for the SPS PDSCH transmission (fig. 7, section 4.2, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS…UE cancels the PUCCH transmission carrying the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH received in slot n (expect the PUCCH corresponding to the 1st PDSCH granted by the activation DCI, for which such conflict is considered as an error case)… If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n…UE needs to multiplex multiple HARQ-ACKs for the SPS PDSCHs in multiple PDSCH occasions. Therefore, a HARQ-ACK codebook is constructed in the available UL slot derived to contain the multiple HARQ-ACK where the available UL slot is indicated by semi-static TDD configuration); and receiving the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH transmission (fig. 7, section 4.2, determination of slot n for HARQ ACK), wherein, based on the first PUCCH resource satisfying conditions in the first slot, the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH transmission is received on a second PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If there is no available UL resource in slot n+K due to conflict TDD configuration…If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n), and wherein the conditions comprise: the first PUCCH resource overlaps with a symbol indicated as DL by the TDD UL-DL configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). However, R1-1912037 does not teach the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List. But, R1-1912541 in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches the first PUCCH resource is provided by a parameter n1PUCCH-AN or by a parameter SPS-PUCCH-AN-List (section 2, The PUCCH resource for HARQ-ACK is configured via SPS-Config with n1PUCCH-AN). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1912541 in the system of R1-1912037 to signal PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to standardize to reduce the complexity of processing the SPS configuration. However, R1-1912037 does not teach there being no PUCCH reception for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI). But, GAO et al. (US 20220399978) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches there being no PUCCH reception for HARQ-ACK scheduled to be performed in the first slot by downlink control information (DCI) (par. 164, supported by page 24 lines 1-6 of 201911136319.6), if DCI format 2-0 indicates that the flexible symbol is unavailable, the above-mentioned flexible symbol is included in the symbol set included in the PUCCH resource 1…then the HARQ-ACK feedback of the SPS PDSCH in the slot n is deferred). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by GAO in the system of R1-1912037 and R1-1912541 to indicate the available of PUCCH resource. The motivation would have been to provide preempt collision. Regarding claim 21, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 12, wherein the conditions comprise: HARQ-ACK information included in the UCI in the first slot is related only to one or more SPS PDSCH receptions (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS). Regarding claim 22, R1-1912037 teaches the UE of claim 18, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, When UE is configured with a DL SPS configuration with short periodicity, since a single timing value is indicated in the DL SPS activation DCI…If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 23, R1-1912037 teaches the UE of claim 18, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to SPS configurations for which corresponding HARQ-ACK information is transmitted on the first PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 24, R1-1912037 teaches the UE of claim 18, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to a plurality of SPS configurations provided to the UE (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n; section 1, HARQ-ACK feedback for SPS PDSCHs without associated DL assignment shall be reported (i.e. no dynamic PDSCH HARQ-ACK), PUCCH resource i is selected if HARQ-ACK payload size (not including CRC) is in the range of {Ni,min, …, Ni,max} bits, where the number of PUCCH resources in the selection is from 0 up to 3). Regarding claim 26, R1-1912037 teaches the UE of claim 18, wherein the conditions comprise: HARQ-ACK information included in the UCI in the first slot is related only to one or more SPS PDSCH receptions (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS). Regarding claim 27, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 19, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to the SPS configuration (fig. 7, section 4.2, When UE is configured with a DL SPS configuration with short periodicity, since a single timing value is indicated in the DL SPS activation DCI…If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 28, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 19, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to SPS configurations for which corresponding HARQ-ACK information is received on the first PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). Regarding claim 29, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 19, wherein the second PUCCH resource is an earliest next available PUCCH resource among PUCCH resources related to a plurality of SPS configurations provided to the UE (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n; section 1, HARQ-ACK feedback for SPS PDSCHs without associated DL assignment shall be reported (i.e. no dynamic PDSCH HARQ-ACK), PUCCH resource i is selected if HARQ-ACK payload size (not including CRC) is in the range of {Ni,min, …, Ni,max} bits, where the number of PUCCH resources in the selection is from 0 up to 3). Regarding claim 32, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 19, wherein the conditions comprise: HARQ-ACK information included in the UCI in the first slot is related only to one or more SPS PDSCH transmissions (fig. 7, section 4.2, when UE is configured with DL SPS, for a SPS PDSCH received in slot n, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in slot n+K where K is indicated by the activation DCI for SPS). Claim(s) 20, 25, 31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over R1-1912037 (“Other issues for URLLC and UE features”, VIVO), R1-1912541 (“Discussion on DL SPS enhancements”, CMCC), and GAO et al. (US 20220399978 with foreign priority CN 201911089886.0 filed on 11/08/2019 and foreign priority CN 201911136319.6 filed on 11/19/2019) as applied to claims 12, 18, 19 above, and further in view of R1-1910620 (“UCI enhancements for URLLC”, OPPO). Regarding claim 20, R1-1912037 does not teach the method of claim 12, wherein, based on the UE having multiple PUCCH transmissions that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH transmissions. But, R1-1910620 (“UCI enhancements for URLLC”, OPPO) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches wherein, based on the UE having multiple PUCCH transmissions that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH transmissions (fig. 2, section 2.3, 3) How to handle the collision between more than two PUCCH/PUSCHs). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1910620 in the system of R1-1912541, R1-1912037, and GAO to handle multiple PUCCHs in a slot. The motivation would have been to optimize the PUCCH transmission with multiple PUCCHs in a slot. Regarding claim 25, R1-1912037 does not teach the UE of claim 18, wherein, based on the UE having multiple PUCCH transmissions that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH transmissions. But, R1-1910620 (“UCI enhancements for URLLC”, OPPO) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches wherein, based on the UE having multiple PUCCH transmissions that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH transmissions (fig. 2, section 2.3, 3) How to handle the collision between more than two PUCCH/PUSCHs). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1910620 in the system of R1-1912541, R1-1912037, and GAO to handle multiple PUCCHs in a slot. The motivation would have been to optimize the PUCCH transmission with multiple PUCCHs in a slot. Regarding claim 31, R1-1912037 does not teach the method of claim 19, wherein, based on the BS having multiple PUCCH receptions from the UE that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH receptions. But, R1-1910620 (“UCI enhancements for URLLC”, OPPO) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches wherein, based on the UE having multiple PUCCH transmissions that overlap in time in the first slot, the UCI in the first slot is related to the multiple PUCCH transmissions (fig. 2, section 2.3, 3) How to handle the collision between more than two PUCCH/PUSCHs). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by R1-1910620 in the system of R1-1912541, R1-1912037, and GAO to handle multiple PUCCHs in a slot. The motivation would have been to optimize the PUCCH transmission with multiple PUCCHs in a slot. Claim(s) 17, 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over R1-1912037 (“Other issues for URLLC and UE features”, VIVO), R1-1912541 (“Discussion on DL SPS enhancements”, CMCC), and GAO et al. (US 20220399978 with foreign priority CN 201911089886.0 filed on 11/08/2019 and foreign priority CN 201911136319.6 filed on 11/19/2019) as applied to claims 12, 19 above, and further in view of LI et al. (US 20210111837). Regarding claim 17, R1-1912037 teaches the method of claim 12, wherein, based on i) the first PUCCH resource satisfying the conditions in the first slot (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n) and ii) the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception is transmitted on the second PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). However, R1-1912037 does not teach ii) the UCI in the first slot including scheduling request, the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception is transmitted without the scheduling request on the second PUCCH resource. But, LI et al. (US 20210111837) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches wherein, based on i) the first PUCCH resource satisfying the conditions in the first slot (par. 40, SR and HARQ-ACK overlapping) and ii) the UCI in the first slot including scheduling request (par. 40, SR and HARQ-ACK overlapping, dropping ACK PUCCH and transmitting the SR), the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH reception is transmitted without the scheduling request on the second PUCCH resource (par. 22, 40, although cancelling or removing the whole or part of the related transmission in the originally configured PUCCH resource, reconfiguring and/or transmitting the cancelled/removed part in other transmission; transmitting the HARQ-ACK in other transmission or second PUCCH without the transmitted SR). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by LI in the system of R1-1912037, R1-1912541, and GAO to handle overlapping between HARQ-ACK and SR. The motivation would have been to complement and improve technical solutions on the overlapping between the PUCCH resources carrying HARQ-ACK and SR. Regarding claim 30, R1-1912037 teaches the method of 19, wherein, based on i) the first PUCCH resource satisfying the conditions in the first slot (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n) and ii) the HARQ- ACK for the SPS PDSCH transmission is received on the second PUCCH resource (fig. 7, section 4.2, If a slot n indicated by the activation DCI for HARQ-ACK transmission for a SPS PDSCH in slot (n-k) is colliding with DL symbols given by semi-static TDD configuration, UE transmits the HARQ-ACK for the SPS PDSCH in the next available UL slot/symbol after slot n). However, R1-1912037 does not teach ii) the UCI in the first slot including scheduling request, the HARQ- ACK for the SPS PDSCH transmission is received on the second PUCCH resource without the scheduling request; But, LI et al. (US 20210111837) in a similar or same field of endeavor teaches wherein, based on i) the first PUCCH resource satisfying the conditions in the first slot (par. 40, SR and HARQ-ACK overlapping) and ii) the UCI in the first slot including scheduling request (par. 40, SR and HARQ-ACK overlapping, dropping ACK PUCCH and transmitting the SR), the HARQ- ACK for the SPS PDSCH transmission is received on the second PUCCH resource without the scheduling request (par. 22, 40, although cancelling or removing the whole or part of the related transmission in the originally configured PUCCH resource, reconfiguring and/or transmitting the cancelled/removed part in other transmission; transmitting the HARQ-ACK in other transmission or second PUCCH without the transmitted SR). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effectively filing date of the claimed invention to implement the system or method as taught by LI in the system of R1-1912037, R1-1912541, and GAO to handle overlapping between HARQ-ACK and SR. The motivation would have been to complement and improve technical solutions on the overlapping between the PUCCH resources carrying HARQ-ACK and SR. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. ERICSSON (“UCI Enhancements for NR URLLC”, R1-1910546) teaches Illustrations of Step1 and Step 2 collision handling procedures for mixed of traffic (fig. 2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THINH D TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3934. The examiner can normally be reached mon-fri 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FARUK HAMZA can be reached at 5712727969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THINH D TRAN/for /Thinh Tran/, Patent Examiner of Art Unit 2466 02/13/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 02, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 17, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603833
ALLOCATING A PACKET TO A MEDIA SESSION CONTROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12568531
MESSAGE SENDING METHOD AND DEVICE, MESSAGE CONFIGURATION METHOD AND DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557150
Radio Resource Control RRC Connection Method and Apparatus and RRC Reconnection Method and Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543201
Access Procedure Resource Configuration
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12543233
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+20.0%)
4y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 532 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month